An Improved Method of the Finite-Difference Sparse Phase Unwrapping

被引:2
|
作者
Liu, Lian [1 ]
Qu, Chunyan [1 ]
Shan, Xinjian [1 ]
机构
[1] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Geol, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
关键词
Finite difference methods; Coherence; Optimization; Earthquakes; Strain; Manganese; Radar interferometry; Finite differences; linear programming (LP); minimum cost flow (MCF); phase unwrapping (PU); synthetic aperture radar interferometry (InSAR); RADAR INTERFEROMETRY; COST-FUNCTIONS; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3074393
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Phase unwrapping (PU) is a significant problem for reconstructing the deformation field during synthetic aperture radar interferometry analysis. The various 2-D PU algorithms can be divided into two categories: path-following methods and optimization-based methods. The former predefine an integration path in which the phase gradient is integrated to obtain the unwrapped results. The latter are path independent and error criterion oriented. The integration of the finite differences and the minimum cost flow solver describes a global optimization problem between the phase residues over closed spatial triangles computed over redundant neighboring edge sets. We propose a modified network using a simplified mathematical formulation for linear programming (LP) in the finite differences PU. Our algorithm has three major advantages over current methods. First, the modified network combines the Delaunay triangulation and K nearest points to avoid isolated regions in the PU process. Second, modified formulation of the LP solver can directly obtain the phase ambiguity cycles of all points without integration. Finally, the combination of the new network and modified LP can achieve better PU results than the other state-of-the-art techniques. We applied our method to synthetic and real data from January 24, 2020 Mw 6.7 earthquake in Doganyol-Sivrice, Turkey to August 8, 2017 Mw 6.5 earthquake in Jiuzhaigou, China. Comprehensive comparisons validate the effectiveness of our method.
引用
收藏
页码:4675 / 4683
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] OPTIMAL FINITE-DIFFERENCE METHOD FOR POTENTIAL FLOWS
    CHWANG, AT
    CHEN, HC
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 1987, 113 (11): : 1759 - 1773
  • [32] CHANNEL ROUTING BY FINITE-DIFFERENCE METHOD - DISCUSSION
    HUANG, YH
    JOURNAL OF THE HYDRAULICS DIVISION-ASCE, 1980, 106 (08): : 1406 - 1406
  • [33] An adaptive finite-difference method for traveltimes and amplitudes
    Qian, JL
    Symes, WW
    GEOPHYSICS, 2002, 67 (01) : 167 - 176
  • [34] Elastic finite-difference method for irregular grids
    Oprsal, I
    Zahradnik, J
    GEOPHYSICS, 1999, 64 (01) : 240 - 250
  • [35] Finite-difference method for singular nonlinear systems
    Buhmiler, Sandra
    Rapajic, Sanja
    Medic, Slavica
    Grbic, Tatjana
    NUMERICAL ALGORITHMS, 2018, 79 (01) : 65 - 86
  • [36] A FINITE-DIFFERENCE VARIATIONAL METHOD FOR BENDING OF PLATES
    ATKATSH, RS
    BARON, ML
    BIENIEK, MP
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1980, 11 (06) : 573 - 577
  • [37] A finite-difference contrast source inversion method
    Abubakar, A.
    Hu, W.
    van den Berg, P. M.
    Habashy, T. M.
    INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2008, 24 (06)
  • [38] Gasostatic bearings calculation by the finite-difference method
    Grigor'ev, B.S.
    Smirnov, D.B.
    Problemy Mashinostraeniya i Nadezhnos'ti Mashin, 2002, (04): : 35 - 42
  • [39] FINITE-DIFFERENCE METHOD FOR TRANSONIC AIRFOIL DESIGN
    STEGER, JL
    KLINEBER.JM
    AIAA JOURNAL, 1973, 11 (05) : 628 - 635
  • [40] Finite-difference method for singular nonlinear systems
    Sandra Buhmiler
    Sanja Rapajić
    Slavica Medić
    Tatjana Grbić
    Numerical Algorithms, 2018, 79 : 65 - 86