Interference of Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Sweetpotato

被引:64
|
作者
Meyers, Stephen L. [1 ]
Jennings, Katherine M. [1 ]
Schultheis, Jonathan R. [1 ]
Monks, David W. [1 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Hort Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
Competition; light interception; rectangular hyperbola model; shoot dry biomass; weed density; IPOMOEA-BATATAS; YIELD LOSS; GROWTH; COMPETITION; RETROFLEXUS; PEANUT; WEEDS; RUDIS; CORN;
D O I
10.1614/WS-D-09-00048.1
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Field studies were conducted in 2007 and 2008 at Clinton and Faison, NC, to evaluate the influence of Palmer amaranth density on 'Beauregard' and 'Covington' sweetpotato yield and quality and to quantify the influence of Palmer amaranth on light interception. Palmer amaranth was established at 0, 0.5, 1.1, 1.6, 3.3, and 6.5 plants m(-1) within the sweetpotato row and densities were maintained season-long. Jumbo, number (no.) 1, and marketable sweetpotato yield losses were fit to a rectangular hyperbola model, and predicted yield loss ranged from 56 to 94%, 30 to 85%, and 36 to 81%, respectively for Palmer amaranth densities of 0.5 to 6.5 plants m(-1). Percentage of jumbo, no. 1, and marketable sweetpotato yield loss displayed a positive linear relationship with Palmer amaranth light interception as early as 6 to 7 wk after planting (R(2) = 0.99, 0.86, and 0.93, respectively). Predicted Palmer amaranth light interception 6 to 7, 10, and 13 to 14 wk after planting ranged from 47 to 68%, 46 to 82%, and 42 to 71%, respectively for Palmer amaranth densities of 0.5 to 6.5 plants m(-1). Palmer amaranth height increased from 177 to 197 cm at densities of 0.5 to 4.1 plants m(-1) and decreased from 197 to 188 cm at densities of 4.1 to 6.5 plants m(-1); plant width (69 to 145 cm) and shoot dry biomass plant(-1) (0.2 to 1.1 kg) decreased linearly as density increased.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 203
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Full-season Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)
    Rowland, MW
    Murray, DS
    Verhalen, LM
    WEED SCIENCE, 1999, 47 (03) : 305 - 309
  • [22] Evaluation of Flumioxazin and S-metolachlor Rate and Timing for Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Sweetpotato
    Meyers, Stephen L.
    Jennings, Katherine M.
    Schultheis, Jonathan R.
    Monks, David W.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 24 (04) : 495 - 503
  • [23] Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Adaptation to US Midwest Agroecosystems
    Oliveira, Maxwel C.
    Jhala, Amit J.
    Bernards, Mark L.
    Proctor, Christopher A.
    Stepanovic, Strahinja
    Werle, Rodrigo
    FRONTIERS IN AGRONOMY, 2022, 4
  • [24] RESISTANCE OF PALMER AMARANTH (AMARANTHUS-PALMERI) TO THE DINITROANILINE HERBICIDES
    GOSSETT, BJ
    MURDOCK, EC
    TOLER, JE
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1992, 6 (03) : 587 - 591
  • [25] Cover Crops Suppression of Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Cotton
    Palhano, Matheus G.
    Norsworthy, Jason K.
    Barber, Tom
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 32 (01) : 60 - 65
  • [26] Impact of auxin herbicides on Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) groundcover
    Priess, Grant L.
    Norsworthy, Jason K.
    Farr, Rodger B.
    Mauromoustakos, Andy
    Butts, Thomas R.
    Roberts, Trenton L.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 35 (05) : 768 - 778
  • [27] Timeline of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) invasion and eradication in Minnesota
    Yu, Eric
    Blair, Shane
    Hardel, Mari
    Chandler, Monika
    Thiede, Denise
    Cortilet, Anthony
    Gunsolus, Jeffrey
    Becker, Roger
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 35 (05) : 802 - 810
  • [28] Impact of irrigation and hail on Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in corn
    Currie, Randall S.
    Klocke, Norman L.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 22 (03) : 448 - 452
  • [29] Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Management in GlyTol® LibertyLink® Cotton
    Reed, Jacob D.
    Keeling, J. Wayne
    Dotray, Peter A.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 28 (04) : 592 - 600
  • [30] Large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) intraspecific and interspecific interference in soybean
    Basinger, Nicholas T.
    Jennings, Katherine M.
    Monks, David W.
    Jordan, David L.
    Everman, Wesley J.
    Hestir, Erin L.
    Bertucci, Matthew B.
    Brownie, Cavell
    WEED SCIENCE, 2019, 67 (06) : 649 - 656