Insights into correlation between board-level drop reliability and package-level ball impact test characteristics

被引:12
|
作者
Yeh, Chang-Lin [1 ]
Lai, Yi-Shao [1 ]
机构
[1] Adv Semicond Engn Inc, Stress Reliabil Lab, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
关键词
ball impact test (BIT); board-level drop test; correlation; finite-element methods; reliability;
D O I
10.1109/TEPM.2006.890640
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The ball impact test (BIT) is developed based on the demand of a package-level measure for the board-level drop reliability of solder joints in the sense that it leads to fracturing of solder joints around the intermetallics, similar to that from a board-level drop test. In this paper, both board-level drop test and package-level ball impact test are examined numerically for solder joints of different Sn-Ag-Cu compositions. We propose a stress-based drop reliability index that involves the strength of intermetallics and the maximum interfacial normal stress the solder joints have experienced during the drop impact process. Correlations between the drop reliability index and BIT characteristics are found to be dependent on solder compositions. However, the correlations appear to be universal, i.e., independent of solder compositions, when certain constant multipliers are introduced.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 91
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Insights into correlation between board-level drop reliability and package-level ball impact test
    Yeh, Chang-Lin
    Lai, Yi-Shao
    56TH ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS & TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE 2006, VOL 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 455 - +
  • [2] Empirical correlation between package-level ball impact test and board-level drop reliability
    Yeh, Chang-Lin
    Lai, Yi-Shao
    Chang, Hsiao-Chuan
    Chen, Tsan-Hsien
    MICROELECTRONICS RELIABILITY, 2007, 47 (07) : 1127 - 1134
  • [3] Correlation between package-level ball impact test and board-level drop test
    Yeh, CL
    Lai, YS
    Chang, HC
    Chen, TH
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH ELECTRONICS PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, VOLS. 1 AND 2, 2005, : 270 - 275
  • [4] INVESTIGATION OF BOARD-LEVEL AND PACKAGE-LEVEL DROP RELIABILITY OF RF MEMS PACKAGES
    Sun, Li
    DeReus, Dana
    Cunningham, Shawn
    Morris, Art
    IMCE2009: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, VOL 5, 2010, : 225 - 230
  • [5] Simulation of ball-grid-array package during board-level drop test
    Yamin, A. F. M.
    Sufian, A. A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH DAY 2017 (MERD), 2017, : 75 - 76
  • [6] Uncertainty and Reliability Analysis of Chip Scale Package Subjected to Board-level Drop Test
    Sano, Masafumi
    Chou, Chan-Yen
    Hung, Tuan-Yu
    Yang, Shin-Yueh
    Chiang, Kuo-Ning
    EUROSIME 2009: THERMAL, MECHANICAL AND MULTI-PHYSICS SIMULATION AND EXPERIMENTS IN MICRO-ELECTRONICS AND MICRO-SYSTEMS, 2009, : 183 - 188
  • [7] Reliability and Parametric Study on Chip Scale Package Under Board-Level Drop Test
    Sano, Masafumi
    Chou, Chan-Yen
    Hung, Tuan-Yu
    Yang, Shin-Yueh
    Huang, Chao-Jen
    Chiang, Kuo-Ning
    IMPACT: 2009 4TH INTERNATIONAL MICROSYSTEMS, PACKAGING, ASSEMBLY AND CIRCUITS TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, 2009, : 470 - 473
  • [8] Correlation studies for component level ball impact shear test and board level drop test
    Wong, E. H.
    Rajoo, R.
    Seah, S. K. W.
    Selvanayagam, C. S.
    van Driel, W. D.
    Caers, J. F. J. M.
    Zhao, X. J.
    Owens, N.
    Tan, L. C.
    Leoni, M.
    Eu, P. L.
    Lai, Y. -S.
    Yeh, C-L
    MICROELECTRONICS RELIABILITY, 2008, 48 (07) : 1069 - 1078
  • [9] Board level drop test reliability for MCP package
    Zhang Jing
    Du Maohua
    Feng Nufeng
    Taekoo, Lee
    ICEPT: 2006 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONICS PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 778 - +
  • [10] An approach to adjust the board-level drop test conditions to improve the correlation with product-level drop impact
    Mattila, T. T.
    Ruotoistenmaki, H.
    Raami, J.
    Hokka, J.
    Makela, M.
    Hussa, E.
    Sillanpaa, M.
    Halkola, V.
    MICROELECTRONICS RELIABILITY, 2014, 54 (04) : 785 - 795