Productivity improvement and multiple management controls: evidence from a manufacturing firm

被引:4
|
作者
Guldenpfennig, Michael [1 ]
Hald, Kim Sundtoft [1 ]
Hansen, Allan [1 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Operat Management, Frederiksberg, Denmark
关键词
Management control systems; Productivity; Manufacturing;
D O I
10.1108/IJOPM-09-2020-0667
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose The present paper explores the multiple management control systems (MCSs) involved in productivity improvement (PI) in manufacturing and how they interrelate. Research has largely neglected the multiplicity and interrelationships of these MCSs. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on an abductive case study approach, the authors collected empirical data from a global automotive supplier that produces complex systems for passenger cars. Recent PI activities are analysed to identify and explain the interrelationships among the multiple MCSs affecting these activities. Findings The study shows how a broad range of MCSs are involved in PI. The study identifies and explores both complementary and conflicting relationships among the MCSs and demonstrates how managers rely on a set of mechanisms to alleviate tensions and strengthen complementarities among these MCSs. Research limitations/implications As this paper is based on a single case study, future research can contribute further generalisations (analytical and statistical) with respect to the MCSs involved in PI, how they are interrelated and which mechanisms managers use to manage their interrelationships. Practical implications Managers seeking to control and improve productivity should consider the complete control package and its interrelationships instead of focussing on each MCS separately. Originality/value The present paper contributes to the knowledge of the multiplicity and interrelationships of MCSs involved in PI and the type of managerial work required to manage their interrelationships.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 1017
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The direct and indirect effects of infrastructure on firm productivity: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing
    Wan, Guanghua
    Zhang, Yan
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2018, 49 : 143 - 153
  • [22] Trade, productivity, and innovation: Firm-level evidence from Malaysian manufacturing
    Lee, Cassey
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS, 2011, 22 (04) : 284 - 294
  • [23] Intangible capital and productivity: Firm-level evidence from German manufacturing
    Kaus, Wolfhard
    Slavtchev, Viktor
    Zimmermann, Markus
    OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 2023, 76 (04): : 970 - 996
  • [24] Productivity and openness: Firm level evidence in Brazilian manufacturing industries
    Liu W.
    Nishijima S.
    Economic Change and Restructuring, 2013, 46 (4) : 363 - 384
  • [25] Eastern Germany on the brink of closing the productivity gap? Firm level evidence from manufacturing
    Goerzig, Bernd
    Gornig, Martin
    Voshage, Ramona
    Werwatz, Axel
    POST-COMMUNIST ECONOMIES, 2010, 22 (04) : 499 - 511
  • [26] Corruption, provincial institutions and manufacturing firm productivity: New evidence from a transitional economy
    Tran Quang Tuyen
    Vu Van Huong
    Doan Thanh Tinh
    Tran Duc Hiep
    ESTUDIOS DE ECONOMIA, 2016, 43 (02): : 199 - 215
  • [27] Manufacturing productivity and impacts of transport infrastructure improvement: Empirical evidence from China
    Liu, Lunwu (llw6303@126.com), 1600, Universidad Central de Venezuela (55):
  • [28] Quality improvement practices and the effect on manufacturing firm performance: evidence from Mexico and the USA
    Adam, EE
    Flores, BE
    Macias, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2001, 39 (01) : 43 - 63
  • [29] Firm-Level Evidence on Productivity Differentials and Turnover in Vietnamese Manufacturing
    Doan Thi Thanh Ha
    Kozo Kiyota
    The Japanese Economic Review, 2014, 65 : 193 - 217
  • [30] Total Factor Productivity in the Ecuatorian manufacturing sector: firm level evidence
    Camino-Mogro, Segundo
    Armijos-Bravo, Grace
    Cornejo-Marcos, Gino
    CUADERNOS DE ECONOMIA-SPAIN, 2018, 41 (117): : 241 - 261