Factors influencing soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic treatment in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion

被引:40
|
作者
Maetevorakul, Suhatcha [1 ]
Viteporn, Smorntree [1 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, Henri Dunant Rd, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
来源
PROGRESS IN ORTHODONTICS | 2016年 / 17卷
关键词
Class II Division 1 malocclusion; Factors; Orthodontic treatment; Soft tissue profile changes; PREMOLAR EXTRACTIONS; LIP RESPONSE; RETRACTION; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1186/s40510-016-0125-1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Several studies have shown soft tissue profile changes after orthodontic treatment in Class II Division 1 patients. However, a few studies have described factors influencing the soft tissue changes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors influencing the soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic treatment in Class II Division 1 patients. Methods: The subjects comprised 104 Thai patients age 8-16 years who presented Class II Division 1 malocclusions and were treated with different orthodontic modalities comprising cervical headgear, Class II traction and extraction of the four first premolars. The profile changes were evaluated from the lateral cephalograms before and after treatment by means of the X-Y coordinate system. Significant soft tissue profile changes were evaluated by paired t test at a 0.05 significance level. The correlations among significant soft tissue changes and independent variables comprising treatment modality, age, sex, pretreatment skeletal, dental and soft tissue morphology were evaluated by stepwise multiple regression analysis at a 0.05 significance level. Results: The multiple regression analysis indicated that different treatment modalities, age, sex, pretreatment skeletal, dental and soft tissue morphology were related to the profile changes. The predictive power of these variables on the soft tissue profile changes ranged from 9.9 to 40.3 %. Conclusions: Prediction of the soft tissue profile changes following treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion from initial patient morphology, age, sex and types of treatment was complicated and required several variables to explain their variations. Upper lip change in horizontal direction could be found only at the stomion superius and was less predictable than those of the lower lip. Variations in upper lip retraction at the stomion superius were explained by types of treatment (R-2 = 0.099), whereas protrusion of the lower lip at the labrale inferius was correlated with initial inclination of the lower incisor (L1 to NB), jaw relation (ANB angle), lower lip thickness and sex (R-2 = 0.403). Prediction of chin protrusion at the soft tissue pogonion was also low predictable (R-2 = 0.190) depending upon sex, age and initial mandibular plane angle (SN-GoGn). Additionally, age and sex also had mainly effect on change of the soft tissue profile in the vertical direction.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Treatment of a Class II Division 1 malocclusion
    Vaught, RA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2000, 118 (02) : 229 - 233
  • [22] Soft tissue changes in Class II division 1 cases
    Brant, JC
    Siqueira, VCV
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : B52 - B52
  • [23] Soft and Hard Tissue Changes Following Treatment of Class Ⅱ Division 1 Malocclusion with Twin-Block and Myofunctional Appliance: A Pilot Study
    Ling XIE
    Ping WANG
    Jianhua WU
    ChineseJournalofPlasticandReconstructiveSurgery, 2020, 2 (04) : 217 - 227
  • [24] Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion after extraction and nonextraction treatment
    Bishara, SE
    Ortho, D
    Cummins, DM
    Zaher, AR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1997, 111 (01) : 18 - 27
  • [25] Soft tissue response following Class II Division 1 surgical treatment.
    Teh, M
    Yow, M
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : 642 - 642
  • [26] Unpredictability of soft tissue changes after camouflage treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion with maximum anterior retraction using miniscrews
    Kim, Kayoung
    Choi, Sung-Hwan
    Choi, Eun-Hee
    Choi, Yoon-Jeong
    Hwang, Chung-Ju
    Cha, Jung-Yul
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2017, 87 (02) : 230 - 238
  • [27] Soft Tissue Profile Changes Following Orthodontic Treatment in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate
    Sutthidechanai, Wisesphon
    Viriyasiri, Nopawun
    Viteporn, Smorntree
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS REVIEW, 2019, 7 (02) : 121 - 127
  • [28] Orthodontic Camouflage Treatment in an Adult Patient with a Class II, Division 1 Malocclusion - A Case Report
    Naragond, Appasaheb
    Kenganal, Smitha
    Sagarkar, Roshan
    Sugaradday
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2013, 7 (02) : 395 - 400
  • [29] EFFECTS OF ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT ON THE GROWTH OF INDIVIDUALS WITH CLASS-II DIVISION-1 MALOCCLUSION
    BISHARA, SE
    ZAHER, AR
    CUMMINS, DM
    JAKOBSEN, JR
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 1994, 64 (03) : 221 - 230
  • [30] Tooth size discrepancies in Class II division 1 and Class III malocclusion requiring surgical-orthodontic or orthodontic treatment
    McSwiney, Timothy P.
    Millett, Declan T.
    McIntyre, Grant T.
    Barry, Mark K.
    Cronin, Michael S.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2014, 41 (02) : 118 - 123