Rate of use and effectiveness of oseltamivir in the treatment of influenza illness in high-risk populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Shim, So-Jung [1 ]
Chan, Mei [1 ,2 ]
Owens, Louisa [1 ,2 ]
Jaffe, Adam [1 ,2 ]
Prentice, Bernadette [1 ,2 ]
Homaira, Nusrat [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Fac Med, Sch Womens & Childrens Hlth, Discipline Pediat, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Sydney Childrens Hosp Randwick, Resp Dept, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
heart diseases; human; influenza; lung diseases; oseltamivir; SEASONAL INFLUENZA; HOSPITALIZED CHILDREN; COMPLICATIONS; INFECTIONS; BENEFITS; CARE;
D O I
10.1002/hsr2.241
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundOseltamivir is recommended in the treatment of influenza illness in high-risk populations, including those with chronic heart and lung diseases. ObjectivesWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the rate of use and effectiveness of oseltamivir in these groups of patients. MethodsThe protocol for the systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019125998). Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and CINAHL were searched for observational studies and randomized controlled trials published up to 16 February 2020. Quality appraisal of final studies was conducted using GRADE guidelines. Data were extracted using a predeveloped template. Main outcomes measured included the rate of use of oseltamivir for influenza-like-illness and its effectiveness in reducing disease severity in patients with cardiopulmonary diseases. Outcomes measured for effectiveness were influenza-related complications (respiratory infections and asthma exacerbations), hospitalization rates, and time to freedom from illness. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2.0 tool for randomized trials and Cochrane's Risk of Bias in nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool for nonrandomized trials. Where data were available, pooled analyses were conducted. Dichotomous variables were evaluated using the Mantel-Hansel method. A random effect model was applied. Summary measures were reported as risk ratios where relevant. ResultsOur systematic review identified nine studies. Oseltamivir use ranged from 25% to 100%. When oseltamivir group was compared to placebo, rates of respiratory tract infections reduced by 28% (RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.59-0.90), hospitalization reduced by 52% (RR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.28-0.80) and median time to illness alleviation decreased by 10.4 to 120hours. There was no significant reduction in asthma exacerbation rates. ConclusionsOur systematic review suggests that the use of oseltamivir is beneficial in reducing disease severity, however, its use in high-risk population remains suboptimal.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Epidemiological features of influenza circulation in swine populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Baudon, Eugeniie
    Peyre, Marisa
    Peiris, Malik
    Cowling, Benjamin John
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (06):
  • [32] Meta-analysis of effectiveness of interventions to increase influenza immunization rates among high-risk population groups
    Sarnoff, R
    Rundall, T
    MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 1998, 55 (04) : 432 - 456
  • [33] Testosterone Therapy for High-risk Prostate Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Teeling, Fiona
    Raison, Nicholas
    Shabbir, Majed
    Yap, Tet
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Ahmed, Kamran
    UROLOGY, 2019, 126 : 16 - 23
  • [34] Risk of heat illness in men and women: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gifford, Robert M.
    Todisco, T.
    Stacey, M.
    Fujisawa, T.
    Allerhand, M.
    Woods, D. R.
    Reynolds, R. M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 171 : 24 - 35
  • [35] Impact of extent of resection on survival in high-risk neuroblastoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Xinyu
    Chen, Jiale
    Wang, Ning
    Liu, Zhui
    Li, Fan
    Zhou, Jinjun
    Tao, Boyuan
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2019, 54 (07) : 1487 - 1494
  • [36] Hippocampal volume in subjects at clinical high-risk for psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Walter, Anna
    Suenderhauf, Claudia
    Harrisberger, Fabienne
    Lenz, Claudia
    Smieskova, Renata
    Chung, Yoonho
    Cannon, Tyrone D.
    Bearden, Carrie E.
    Rapp, Charlotte
    Bendfeldt, Kerstin
    Borgwardt, Stefan
    Vogel, Tobias
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2016, 71 : 680 - 690
  • [37] Treatments and outcomes in high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Albright, Benjamin B.
    Ellett, Tressa
    Knochenhauer, Hope E.
    Goins, Emily C.
    Monuszko, Karen A.
    Kaplan, Samantha J.
    Previs, Rebecca A.
    Moss, Haley A.
    Havrilesky, Laura J.
    Davidson, Brittany A.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 130 (05) : 443 - 453
  • [38] The effect of additional chemotherapy on high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Junru
    Zhang, Xingming
    Sun, Guangxi
    Zhao, Jinge
    Liu, Jiandong
    Zhao, Peng
    Dai, Jindong
    Shen, Pengfei
    Zeng, Hao
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2018, 11 : 9061 - 9070
  • [39] Adjuvant Therapy in High-Risk Renal Cell Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Riaz, Irbaz B.
    Faridi, Warda
    Husnain, Muhammad
    Malik, Saad Ullah
    Sipra, Qurat Ul Ain R.
    Gondal, Farva R.
    Xie, Hao
    Yadav, Siddhartha
    Kohli, Manish
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2019, 94 (08) : 1524 - 1534
  • [40] Impact of Physical Activity Interventions on High-Risk Pregnancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Silva-Jose, Cristina
    Mottola, Michelle F.
    Palacio, Montse
    Sanchez-Polan, Miguel
    Zhang, Dingfeng
    Refoyo, Ignacio
    Barakat, Ruben
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2024, 14 (01):