Rate of use and effectiveness of oseltamivir in the treatment of influenza illness in high-risk populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Shim, So-Jung [1 ]
Chan, Mei [1 ,2 ]
Owens, Louisa [1 ,2 ]
Jaffe, Adam [1 ,2 ]
Prentice, Bernadette [1 ,2 ]
Homaira, Nusrat [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Fac Med, Sch Womens & Childrens Hlth, Discipline Pediat, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Sydney Childrens Hosp Randwick, Resp Dept, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
heart diseases; human; influenza; lung diseases; oseltamivir; SEASONAL INFLUENZA; HOSPITALIZED CHILDREN; COMPLICATIONS; INFECTIONS; BENEFITS; CARE;
D O I
10.1002/hsr2.241
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundOseltamivir is recommended in the treatment of influenza illness in high-risk populations, including those with chronic heart and lung diseases. ObjectivesWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the rate of use and effectiveness of oseltamivir in these groups of patients. MethodsThe protocol for the systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019125998). Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and CINAHL were searched for observational studies and randomized controlled trials published up to 16 February 2020. Quality appraisal of final studies was conducted using GRADE guidelines. Data were extracted using a predeveloped template. Main outcomes measured included the rate of use of oseltamivir for influenza-like-illness and its effectiveness in reducing disease severity in patients with cardiopulmonary diseases. Outcomes measured for effectiveness were influenza-related complications (respiratory infections and asthma exacerbations), hospitalization rates, and time to freedom from illness. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2.0 tool for randomized trials and Cochrane's Risk of Bias in nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool for nonrandomized trials. Where data were available, pooled analyses were conducted. Dichotomous variables were evaluated using the Mantel-Hansel method. A random effect model was applied. Summary measures were reported as risk ratios where relevant. ResultsOur systematic review identified nine studies. Oseltamivir use ranged from 25% to 100%. When oseltamivir group was compared to placebo, rates of respiratory tract infections reduced by 28% (RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.59-0.90), hospitalization reduced by 52% (RR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.28-0.80) and median time to illness alleviation decreased by 10.4 to 120hours. There was no significant reduction in asthma exacerbation rates. ConclusionsOur systematic review suggests that the use of oseltamivir is beneficial in reducing disease severity, however, its use in high-risk population remains suboptimal.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Populations at risk for severe or complicated influenza illness: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mertz, Dominik
    Kim, Tae Hyong
    Johnstone, Jennie
    Lam, Po-Po
    Science, Michelle
    Kuster, Stefan P.
    Fadel, Shaza A.
    Tran, Dat
    Fernandez, Eduardo
    Bhatnagar, Neera
    Loeb, Mark
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 347
  • [2] EFFECTIVENESS AND SIDE EFFECTS OF OSELTAMIVIR FOR INFLUENZA TREATMENT: A META-ANALYSIS OF META-ANALYSIS
    Vargas-Sandoval, G.
    Castaneda-Orjuela, C.
    Mercado-Reyes, M. M.
    De la Lloz-Bestrem, F.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A832 - A832
  • [3] Comparison of Efficacy of Intravenous Peramivir and Oral Oseltamivir for the Treatment of Influenza: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lee, Jonghoo
    Park, Ju-Hee
    Jwa, Hyeyoung
    Kim, Yee Hyung
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 58 (04) : 778 - 785
  • [4] Tocolytic Therapy Inhibiting Preterm Birth in High-Risk Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yamaji, Noyuri
    Suzuki, Hitomi
    Saito, Kana
    Swa, Toshiyuki
    Namba, Fumihiko
    Vogel, Joshua P.
    Ramson, Jenny A.
    Cao, Jenny
    Tina, Lavin
    Ota, Erika
    CHILDREN-BASEL, 2023, 10 (03):
  • [5] Benefits and harms of screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk populations: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Jichun
    Yang, Zhirong
    Zeng, Xueyang
    Yu, Shuqing
    Gao, Le
    Jiang, Yu
    Sun, Feng
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER CENTER, 2023, 3 (03): : 175 - 185
  • [6] Identifying latent tuberculosis in high-risk populations: systematic review and meta-analysis of test accuracy
    Auguste, P.
    Madan, J.
    Tsertsvadze, A.
    Court, R.
    McCarthy, N.
    Sutcliffe, P.
    Taylor-Phillips, S.
    Pink, J.
    Clarke, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE, 2019, 23 (11) : 1178 - 1190
  • [7] Opportunities to Prevent Alcoholic Liver Cirrhosis in High-Risk Populations: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
    Askgaard, Gro
    Kjaer, Mette S.
    Tolstrup, Janne S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 114 (02): : 221 - 232
  • [8] Influenza vaccine effectiveness among high-risk groups: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies
    Restivo, Vincenzo
    Costantino, Claudio
    Bono, Stefania
    Maniglia, Marialuisa
    Marchese, Valentina
    Ventura, Gianmarco
    Casuccio, Alessandra
    Tramuto, Fabio
    Vitale, Francesco
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2018, 14 (03) : 724 - 735
  • [9] Pregnancy with multiple high-risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Yue
    Ding, Weijie
    Wu, Tingting
    Wu, Songtao
    Wang, Hui
    Fawad, Muhammad
    Adane, Akilew Awoke
    Dai, Xiaochen
    Zhu, Xiaoqin
    Xu, Xiaolin
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH, 2025, 15
  • [10] Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Osterholm, Michael T.
    Kelley, Nicholas S.
    Sommer, Alfred
    Belongia, Edward A.
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2012, 12 (01): : 36 - 44