Balanced scorecard;
Interpretive structural modelling;
Strategic agility;
Organizational agility;
House of quality;
Quality function deployment;
SUPPLY CHAIN AGILITY;
ORGANIZATIONAL AGILITY;
ENTERPRISE AGILITY;
ACHIEVING AGILITY;
AMBIDEXTERITY;
PERFORMANCE;
DRIVERS;
AHP;
CAPABILITIES;
COMPETENCE;
D O I:
10.1108/JEIM-10-2018-0233
中图分类号:
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号:
081203 ;
0835 ;
摘要:
Purpose For organizations competing in volatile environments, strategic agility is the key for sustaining in the market. It is essential for such organizations to identify the main agility indicators that contribute to their strategic core. The purpose of this paper is to propose and test a systematic methodology that identifies key agility indicators through prioritization and establishing the intra- and inter-relationships among them. Design/methodology/approach The methodology consists of four phases. Phase I forms a pool of agility key performance indicators (KPIs). Phase II categorizes and ranks the KPIs based on their importance and the gap that exists between their current and desired level. Using interpretive structural modeling, phase III establishes the intra-relationships among the KPIs as well as agility attributes, agility enablers and improvement paths, collectively referred to as agility indicators. Finally, phase IV analyzes the inter-relationships among agility indicators using three consecutive houses of quality. Findings To demonstrate the capability of the proposed methodology, it was applied to a dairy food company operating in a competitive environment. The application could address the shortcomings of previous agility methodologies and helped the company to assign resources to the right agility indicators with the highest influence on strategic agility. Originality/value The paper contributes to the literature of strategic and organizational agility by proposing a systematic methodology that considers both intra- and inter-relationships among agility indicators. The methodology also makes a decent contribution in addressing organizational ambidexterity by analyzing mutually exclusive indicators pertaining to current and future opportunities for the organization.
机构:
Oakland Univ, Sch Business Adm, MIS, Rochester, MI 48063 USAOakland Univ, Sch Business Adm, MIS, Rochester, MI 48063 USA
Balijepally, VenuGopal
DeHondt, Gerald
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Ball State Univ, Muncie, IN 47306 USAOakland Univ, Sch Business Adm, MIS, Rochester, MI 48063 USA
DeHondt, Gerald
Sugumaran, Vijayan
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Oakland Univ, Management Informat Syst, Rochester, MI 48063 USA
Oakland Univ, Dept Decis & Informat Sci, Rochester, MI 48063 USAOakland Univ, Sch Business Adm, MIS, Rochester, MI 48063 USA
Sugumaran, Vijayan
Nerur, Sridhar
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Texas Arlington, Informat Syst, Arlington, TX 76019 USAOakland Univ, Sch Business Adm, MIS, Rochester, MI 48063 USA
机构:
North Dakota State Univ, Dept Commun, Fargo, ND USA
North Dakota State Univ, Dept Commun, 338 Minard Hall, Fargo, ND 58105 USANorth Dakota State Univ, Dept Commun, Fargo, ND USA
机构:
Univ Leeds, Leeds Univ Business Sch, Int Business CIBUL, Leeds, W Yorkshire, EnglandUniv Leeds, Leeds Univ Business Sch, Int Business CIBUL, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
Ahammad, Mohammad Faisal
Basu, Shubhabrata
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Indian Inst Management Indore, Strateg Management Area, Indore, IndiaUniv Leeds, Leeds Univ Business Sch, Int Business CIBUL, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
Basu, Shubhabrata
Munjal, Surender
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Leeds, Leeds Univ Business Sch, Int Business CIBUL, Leeds, W Yorkshire, EnglandUniv Leeds, Leeds Univ Business Sch, Int Business CIBUL, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
Munjal, Surender
论文数: 引用数:
h-index:
机构:
Clegg, Jeremy
Shoham, Ofra Bazel
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Temple Univ, Finance Fox Sch Business, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USAUniv Leeds, Leeds Univ Business Sch, Int Business CIBUL, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England