SEC Comment Letters and 10-K Accounting and Linguistic Reporting Complexity

被引:3
|
作者
Burke, Jenna J. [1 ]
Gunny, Katherine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Sch Business, Denver, CO 80220 USA
来源
关键词
comment letters; reporting complexity; accounting complexity; XBRL; linguistic complexity; Securities and Exchange Commission; DISCLOSURE; ENFORCEMENT; READABILITY; EARNINGS;
D O I
10.1177/0148558X221115116
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The increasing complexity of 10-K reporting has caused difficulties for investors seeking to understand and analyze a company's financial reports. In this study, we examine whether the SEC's comment letter process, consistent with its mission to improve public company disclosure, reduces reporting complexity in subsequent filings. We find comment letter receipt has a competing impact on two distinct dimensions of reporting complexity. Specifically, reporting complexity related to accounting concepts decreases after comment letter receipt, but linguistic reporting complexity increases. Validating this competing impact, we find that both changes to complexity are associated with changes in firms' information asymmetry in the expected directions. Further analysis of the increase in linguistic reporting complexity suggests that managers obfuscate following comment letter receipt, where the increase is unnecessary and not occurring in response to changes in the firms' accounting or underlying economics/operations. Overall, results suggest that while the comment letter process simplifies the presentation of reported accounting information, it also has the unintended consequence of decreasing the readability of reports. This nuance is important to understand, given that the federal government dedicates significant resources to the comment letter process.
引用
收藏
页码:1090 / 1120
页数:31
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] The readability of company responses to SEC comment letters and SEC 10-K filing review outcomes
    Cory A. Cassell
    Lauren M. Cunningham
    Ling Lei Lisic
    Review of Accounting Studies, 2019, 24 : 1252 - 1276
  • [2] The readability of company responses to SEC comment letters and SEC 10-K filing review outcomes
    Cassell, Cory A.
    Cunningham, Lauren M.
    Lisic, Ling Lei
    REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 2019, 24 (04) : 1252 - 1276
  • [3] Reviewing the SEC's Review Process: 10-K Comment Letters and the Cost of Remediation
    Cassell, Cory A.
    Dreher, Lauren M.
    Myers, Linda A.
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2013, 88 (06): : 1875 - 1908
  • [4] Text Mining to Uncover the Intensity of SEC Comment Letters and Its Association with the Probability of 10-K Restatement
    Liu, Yue
    Moffitt, Kevin C.
    JOURNAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN ACCOUNTING, 2016, 13 (01) : 85 - 94
  • [5] Financial reporting complexity and investor underreaction to 10-K information
    You, Haifeng
    Zhang, Xiao-jun
    REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 2009, 14 (04) : 559 - 586
  • [6] Financial reporting complexity and investor underreaction to 10-K information
    Haifeng You
    Xiao-jun Zhang
    Review of Accounting Studies, 2009, 14 : 559 - 586
  • [7] An Evaluation of SEC 10-K Charts
    Garrett, Nathan
    JOURNAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN ACCOUNTING, 2022, 19 (02) : 81 - 104
  • [8] An SEC 10-K XML Schema Extension
    Augustine, William
    Goel, Sanjay
    AMCIS 2016 PROCEEDINGS, 2016,
  • [9] Accounting executives and readability of 10-K reports
    Kim, Jeong-Taek
    Lee, Seung Jae
    Sunwoo, Hee-Yeon
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024, 56 (60) : 9356 - 9372
  • [10] The Materiality of Accounting Errors: Evidence from SEC Comment Letters
    Acito, Andrew A.
    Burks, Jeffrey J.
    Johnson, W. Bruce
    CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2019, 36 (02) : 839 - 868