Free entry and social inefficiency under co-opetition

被引:8
|
作者
Hattori, Keisuke [1 ]
Yoshikawa, Takeshi [2 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ Econ, Fac Econ, Higashiyodogawa Ku, 2-2-8 Osumi, Osaka 5338533, Japan
[2] Univ Hyogo, Grad Sch Econ, Nishi Ku, 8-2-1 Gakuennishi Machi, Kobe, Hyogo 6512197, Japan
关键词
Excess entry; Free entry; Entry regulations; Common property resources; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; EXCESS-ENTRY; MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION; ECONOMIC WELFARE; THEOREM; EFFICIENCY; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1007/s00712-015-0469-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We investigate the social desirability of free entry under co-opetition where firms compete in a homogeneous product market while sharing common property resources that affect industry-wide demand. Our findings indicate that free entry leads to socially excessive or insufficient market entry, depending on the commitment of investment in common property resources. In the non-commitment case, where quantities and investment are simultaneously chosen, there is a possibility of insufficient entry. However, in the pre-commitment case, where investment is chosen at a prior stage, free entry leads to excess entry and a reduction in common property resources. Interestingly, in this case, the excess entry results of Mankiw and Whinston (RAND J Econ 17:48-58, 1986) hold even without entry costs or economies of scale. These results have important policy implications for entry regulation.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 119
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Free entry and social inefficiency in radio broadcasting
    Berry, ST
    Waldfogel, J
    RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1999, 30 (03): : 397 - 420
  • [42] Co-Opetition and the Firm's Information Environment
    Bushee, Brian J.
    Keusch, Thomas
    Kim-Gina, Jessica
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2024, 70 (10) : 6917 - 6941
  • [43] Innovation Co-opetition A Knowledge Management Perspective
    Wu, Feng-Shang
    Wu, Chien-Hsin
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION/IEEE LNTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (ICE/ITMC), 2016,
  • [44] Digital platform compatibility strategies in platform co-opetition
    Liu, He
    Amit, Raphael
    Qiao, Han
    Wang, Shouyang
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2024, 174
  • [45] Co-opetition the name of the game for vendors of optical transceivers
    Fuller, Meghan
    Lightwave, 2002, 19 (06):
  • [46] PARTNER SELECTION IN CO-OPETITION: A THREE STEP MODEL
    Alves, Joao
    Meneses, Raquel
    CONFRONTING CONTEMPORARY BUSINESS CHALLENGES THROUGH MANAGEMENT INNOVATION, 2013, : 92 - 106
  • [47] Co-opetition: a source of international opportunities in Finnish SMEs
    Kock, Soren
    Nisuls, Johanna
    Soderqvist, Anette
    COMPETITIVENESS REVIEW, 2010, 20 (02) : 111 - +
  • [48] A co-opetition perspective of technology alliance governance modes
    Hung, Shiu-Wan
    Chang, Chia-Chin
    TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2012, 24 (07) : 679 - 696
  • [49] Dynamic Capabilities at Samsung: OPTIMIZING INTERNAL CO-OPETITION
    Song, Jaeyong
    Lee, Kyungmook
    Khanna, Tarun
    CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2016, 58 (04) : 118 - 140
  • [50] Game and equilibria for co-opetition based on value net
    Ren, Licheng
    Shi, Shenglin
    Seventh International Conference on Electronic Commerce, Vols 1 and 2, Selected Proceedings, 2005, : 413 - 416