Patterns of fecal incontinence after anal surgery

被引:56
|
作者
Lindsey, I [1 ]
Jones, OM [1 ]
Smilgin-Humphreys, MM [1 ]
Cunningham, C [1 ]
Mortensen, NJ [1 ]
机构
[1] John Radcliffe Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
关键词
fecal incontinence; anal sphincter; anal surgery;
D O I
10.1007/s10350-004-0651-7
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE: Conservative anal surgery, with maximum preservation of the anal sphincters and continence, is becoming increasingly possible with the emergence of new sphincter-paring treatments. Many surgeons remain skeptical, however, of the nature and impact of incontinence after anal surgery. We aimed to characterize the patterns of anal sphincter injury in patients with fecal incontinence after anal surgery. METHODS: We reviewed our fecal incontinence database and studied a subset developing incontinence after anal surgery. Maximum resting and squeeze pressures and the distal high-pressure zone to mid-anal canal resting pressure gradient were evaluated. Anal ultrasounds were evaluated and specific postoperative lesions were characterized. RESULTS: Patterns of sphincter injury in 93 patients with fecal incontinence after manual dilation, internal sphincterotomy, fistulotomy, and hemorrhoidectomy were studied. The internal sphincter was almost universally injured, in a pattern specific to the underlying procedure. One-third of patients had a related surgical external sphincter injury. Two-thirds of women had an unrelated obstetric external sphincter injury. The distal resting pressure was typically reduced, with reversal of the normal resting pressure gradient of the anal canal in 89 percent of patients. Maximum squeeze pressure was normal in 52 percent. CONCLUSION: Incontinence after anal surgery is characterized by the virtually universal presence of an internal sphincter injury, which is distal in the high-pressure zone, resulting in a reversal of the normal resting pressure gradient in the anal canal. These data support concerns that non-sphincter-sparing anal surgery leads to fecal incontinence and is increasingly difficult to justify given the availability of modern sphincter-sparing approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:1643 / 1649
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prevalence of fecal incontinence (Fi) and urinary incontinence (Ui) after bariatric surgery
    Roberson, Erica N.
    Gould, Jon C.
    Bushman, Wade A.
    Wald, Arnold
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 134 (04) : A65 - A65
  • [22] RESULTS OF PARKS OPERATION FOR FECAL INCONTINENCE AFTER ANAL-SPHINCTER INJURY
    BROWNING, GGP
    MOTSON, RW
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1983, 286 (6381): : 1873 - 1875
  • [23] SPONTANEOUS ANAL RELAXATION - A CAUSE OF FECAL INCONTINENCE
    WEI, MS
    KERRIGAN, DD
    READ, NW
    DONNELLY, TC
    GUT, 1988, 29 (10) : A1486 - A1486
  • [24] Role of anal cushions in idiopathic fecal incontinence
    Thekkinkattil, D.
    Gonsalves, S.
    Lim, M.
    Dunham, R.
    Sagar, P.
    Finan, P.
    Burke, D.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (05) : 749 - 749
  • [25] Technique of anal band implantation for fecal incontinence
    Baumgartner, Ulrich
    COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2020, 42 (05) : 392 - 399
  • [26] Anal endosonography in the evaluation of fecal incontinence.
    Lippe, SD
    Tripodi, J
    Rex, D
    Burakoff, R
    Gress, F
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1998, 114 (04) : A793 - A793
  • [27] Anal injection of dextranomer for treatment of fecal incontinence
    Kelsall, Diane
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2011, 183 (08) : 933 - 933
  • [28] Fecal incontinence responses to anal electrical stimulation
    Tantawy, Sayed A.
    BIOSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2019, 16 (02): : 1167 - 1173
  • [29] Ten-Year Outcome After Anal Sphincter Repair for Fecal Incontinence
    Zutshi, Massarat
    Hull, Tracy
    Bast, Jane
    Halverson, Amy
    Na, Jeanie
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2009, 52 (06) : 1089 - 1094
  • [30] Risk factors for recurrence and incontinence after anal fistula surgery
    Jordan, J.
    Roig, J. V.
    Garcia-Armengol, J.
    Garcia-Granero, E.
    Solana, A.
    Lledo, S.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2010, 12 (03) : 254 - 260