The TriGuard embolic deflection device for prevention of stroke and cerebral embolization during transcatheter aortic valve replacement

被引:2
|
作者
Baumbach, Andreas [1 ]
Pietras, Cody [2 ]
Lansky, Alexandra [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirm, Bristol Heart Inst, Upper Maudlin St, Bristol BS2 8HW, Avon, England
[2] Yale Cardiovasc Res Grp, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
embolic protection; stroke; transcatheter aortic valve implantation; IMPLANTATION; SURGERY; TAVI;
D O I
10.1586/17434440.2015.1086642
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The incidence of embolic ischemic cerebral events during transcatheter aortic valve implantation remains high. The effects range from clinically silent embolic lesions in the brain to severe disabling stroke. Memory loss and other functional neurocognitive impairment are a direct result of embolic strokes. The TriGuard embolic deflection device is a nitinol frame filter that is placed across all three aortic cerebral vessel ostia to prevent particles from entering the brain circulation during the procedure. The results of clinical studies suggest that this procedure can lead to a reduction of embolic events, and an improvement of neurocognitive function when compared with unprotected transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 651
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Pros and Cons of Cerebral Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Eltchaninoff, Helene
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 9 (20) : 2134 - 2136
  • [22] Impact of Embolic Protection Device Placed During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation on Postdischarge Stroke Prevention
    Majmundar, Monil
    Kumar, Ashish
    Kalra, Ankur
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 158 : 150 - 152
  • [23] Dual -Filter Cerebral Protection Device for Stroke Prevention During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Meta -Analysis
    Ndunda, Paul M.
    Vindhyal, Mohinder
    Khayyat, Sinan
    Muutu, Tabitha
    Fanari, Zaher
    ARTERIOSCLEROSIS THROMBOSIS AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY, 2019, 39
  • [24] Cerebral Embolic Protection Device protects against stroke during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): An Updated Meta-Analysis
    Basit, J.
    Fatima, M.
    Zaheer, Z.
    Rehman, M. Ebad Ur
    Ahmed, N.
    Lee, Q.
    Saeed, S.
    Leung, C.
    Maqbool, S.
    Malik, J.
    Tse, G.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2023, 44
  • [25] Cerebral embolic protection systems for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Gasior, Tomasz
    Mangner, Norman
    Bijoch, Julia
    Wojakowski, Wojciech
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 31 (06) : 891 - 898
  • [26] Transcarotid transcatheter aortic valve replacement with cerebral embolic protection
    McGrath, Daniel
    Salehi, Payam
    Weintraub, Andrew
    Zhan, Yong
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2022, 37 (06) : 1779 - 1782
  • [27] First-in-man use of the new-generation TriGUARD 3 cerebral embolic protection device during transcatheter aortic valve implantation
    Paradis, Jean-Michel
    Nazif, Tamim M.
    Rodes-Cabau, Josep
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2018, 14 (11) : E1178 - E1179
  • [28] Filtering the Truth Behind Cerebral Embolization During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Rodes-Cabau, Josep
    Puri, Rishi
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (05) : 725 - 727
  • [29] Cerebral embolic protection during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Insights from a consecutive series with the Sentinel cerebral protection device
    Wolfrum, Mathias
    Moccetti, Federico
    Loretz, Lucca
    Bossard, Matthias
    Attiger, Adrian
    Cuculi, Florim
    Toggweiler, Stefan
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2023, 102 (02) : 339 - 347
  • [30] Cerebral Embolic Protection and Stroke-Related Mortality Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Isogai, Toshiaki
    Bansal, Agam
    Vanguru, Husitha Reddy
    Agrawal, Ankit
    Shekhar, Shashank
    Puri, Rishi
    Reed, Grant W.
    Krishnaswamy, Amar
    Uchino, Ken
    Kapadia, Samir R.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 15 (05) : 569 - 571