The Trade-Off between Quantity and Quality in Family Fertility Decision: Evidence from China's Family Planning Policy

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Shangao [1 ]
Tian, Xu [2 ]
Zhou, Yingheng [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing 210095, Peoples R China
[2] China Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangxi Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
family planning policy; quantity-quality trade-off; only child; child with siblings; education attainment; personal income; ONE-CHILD POLICY; MATCHING ESTIMATORS; PROPENSITY SCORE; BIRTH-ORDER; SIZE; INVESTMENT; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.3868/s060-013-021-0004-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Based on the Chinese General Social Survey 2006 and 2008 data, this paper assesses the influence of the family planning policy on the qualitative development of children using education attainment and individual income of only children versus children with siblings as parameters. Our results show the following: (1) only children are better-educated than their counterparts with siblings; (2) only children earn higher income in comparison to their counterparts with siblings; (3) the income and education gaps between girls with and without siblings are greater than those between boys; (4) the education gaps between only children and children with siblings are greater for those born in the 1970s, but the income difference between only children and children with siblings is only significant for those born in the 1980s; and (5) the income and education gaps between only children and children with siblings are higher in urban regions. Results indicate that families with only one child invest more resources in children's quality under the family planning policy, which is consistent with the "quantity-quality trade-off" theory proposed by Gary Becker.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 104
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fertility, family planning, and population policy in China.
    Croll, Elisabeth J.
    CHINA QUARTERLY, 2006, (187): : 767 - 769
  • [22] The trade-off between fertility and education: evidence from before the demographic transition
    Becker, Sascha O.
    Cinnirella, Francesco
    Woessmann, Ludger
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2010, 15 (03) : 177 - 204
  • [23] The distance-quality trade-off in women's choice of family planning provider in North Eastern Tanzania
    Elewonibi, Bilikisu
    Sato, Ryoko
    Manongi, Rachel
    Msuya, Sia
    Shah, Iqbal
    Canning, David
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2020, 5 (02):
  • [24] Family size and schooling in sub-Saharan Africa: testing the quantity-quality trade-off
    Alidou, Sahawal
    Verpoorten, Marijke
    JOURNAL OF POPULATION ECONOMICS, 2019, 32 (04) : 1353 - 1399
  • [25] Family size and schooling in sub-Saharan Africa: testing the quantity-quality trade-off
    Sahawal Alidou
    Marijke Verpoorten
    Journal of Population Economics, 2019, 32 : 1353 - 1399
  • [26] Gendered fertility intentions and child schooling: insights on the quantity-quality trade-off from Ethiopia
    Boonaert, Eva
    Van Hoyweghen, Kaat
    Feyisa, Ashenafi Duguma
    Goos, Peter
    Maertens, Miet
    JOURNAL OF DEMOGRAPHIC ECONOMICS, 2022,
  • [27] Do firms face a trade-off between the quantity and the quality of their inventions?
    de Rassenfosse, Gaetan
    RESEARCH POLICY, 2013, 42 (05) : 1072 - 1079
  • [28] HEALTH STATUS INDEXES - TRADE-OFF BETWEEN QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF LIFE
    JONES, MB
    SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 1977, 11 (06) : 301 - 305
  • [29] THE OPTIMAL TRADE-OFF BETWEEN QUALITY AND QUANTITY WITH UNKNOWN NUMBER OF SURVIVORS
    Baudin, Thomas
    MATHEMATICAL POPULATION STUDIES, 2012, 19 (02) : 94 - 113
  • [30] AN INVESTIGATION OF WOMEN'S ATTITUDES TOWARDS FERTILITY AND CHINA'S FAMILY PLANNING POLICY
    Cao, Shixiong
    Tian, Tao
    Qi, Fan
    Ma, Li
    Wang, Guosheng
    JOURNAL OF BIOSOCIAL SCIENCE, 2010, 42 (03) : 359 - 375