The Trade-Off between Quantity and Quality in Family Fertility Decision: Evidence from China's Family Planning Policy

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Shangao [1 ]
Tian, Xu [2 ]
Zhou, Yingheng [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing 210095, Peoples R China
[2] China Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangxi Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
family planning policy; quantity-quality trade-off; only child; child with siblings; education attainment; personal income; ONE-CHILD POLICY; MATCHING ESTIMATORS; PROPENSITY SCORE; BIRTH-ORDER; SIZE; INVESTMENT; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.3868/s060-013-021-0004-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Based on the Chinese General Social Survey 2006 and 2008 data, this paper assesses the influence of the family planning policy on the qualitative development of children using education attainment and individual income of only children versus children with siblings as parameters. Our results show the following: (1) only children are better-educated than their counterparts with siblings; (2) only children earn higher income in comparison to their counterparts with siblings; (3) the income and education gaps between girls with and without siblings are greater than those between boys; (4) the education gaps between only children and children with siblings are greater for those born in the 1970s, but the income difference between only children and children with siblings is only significant for those born in the 1980s; and (5) the income and education gaps between only children and children with siblings are higher in urban regions. Results indicate that families with only one child invest more resources in children's quality under the family planning policy, which is consistent with the "quantity-quality trade-off" theory proposed by Gary Becker.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 104
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Family-Size Effect on Intergenerational Income Mobility under China's Family Planning Policy: Testing the Quantity-Quality Trade-Off
    Mu, Xinxin
    Chen, Shenghu
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [2] The quality–quantity trade-off: evidence from the relaxation of China’s one-child policy
    Haoming Liu
    Journal of Population Economics, 2014, 27 : 565 - 602
  • [3] Quantity-Quality Trade-Off and Early Childhood Development in Rural Family: Evidence from China's Guizhou Province
    Zhong, Jingdong
    Gao, Jingjing
    Liu, Chengfang
    Huang, Jie
    Luo, Renfu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (07)
  • [4] Small Family, Happy Family? Fertility Preferences and the Quantity–Quality Trade-Off in Sub-Saharan Africa
    Kaat Van Hoyweghen
    Janne Bemelmans
    Hendrik Feyaerts
    Goedele Van den Broeck
    Miet Maertens
    Population Research and Policy Review, 2023, 42
  • [5] The quality-quantity trade-off: evidence from the relaxation of China's one-child policy
    Liu, Haoming
    JOURNAL OF POPULATION ECONOMICS, 2014, 27 (02) : 565 - 602
  • [6] Small Family, Happy Family? Fertility Preferences and the Quantity-Quality Trade-Off in Sub-Saharan Africa
    Van Hoyweghen, Kaat
    Bemelmans, Janne
    Feyaerts, Hendrik
    van den Broeck, Goedele
    Maertens, Miet
    POPULATION RESEARCH AND POLICY REVIEW, 2023, 42 (06)
  • [7] THE TRADE-OFF BETWEEN CHILD QUANTITY AND QUALITY
    HANUSHEK, EA
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1992, 100 (01) : 84 - 117
  • [8] Family size effects on childhood obesity: Evidence on the quantity-quality trade-off using the NLSY
    Dasgupta, Kabir
    Solomon, Keisha T.
    ECONOMICS & HUMAN BIOLOGY, 2018, 29 : 42 - 55
  • [9] China's family planning policy and fertility transition
    Zhai, Zhenwu
    Jin, Guangzhao
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2023, 9 (04) : 479 - 496
  • [10] The offspring quantity - quality trade-off and human fertility variation
    Lawson, David W.
    Mulder, Monique Borgerhoff
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 371 (1692)