Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with early discontinuation of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice

被引:13
|
作者
Weycker, Derek [1 ]
Li, Xiaoyan [2 ]
Barron, Rich [2 ]
Li, Yanli [2 ]
Reiner, Maureen [2 ]
Kartashov, Alex [1 ]
Figueredo, Jacqueline [1 ]
Tzivelekis, Spiros [2 ]
Garcia, Jacob [2 ]
机构
[1] PAI, Davis Court 4, Brookline, MA USA
[2] Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
关键词
Febrile neutropenia; Pegfilgrastim; Neulasta; Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; BREAST-CANCER; PROPENSITY SCORE; DOSE-INTENSITY; DOUBLE-BLIND; FILGRASTIM; CARE; MULTICENTER; MORTALITY; ONCOLOGY; COSTS;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-015-3039-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Accumulating evidence suggests that not all cancer chemotherapy patients who receive first-cycle pegfilgrastim prophylaxis continue to receive it in subsequent cycles and that these patients may be subsequently at higher risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). Additional evidence from US clinical practice is warranted. Methods Data from two US private healthcare claims repositories were employed. The source population comprised adults who received "intermediate-risk" or "high-risk" chemotherapy regimens for solid cancers or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and first-cycle pegfilgrastim prophylaxis. From the source population, all patients who did not receive second-cycle pegfilgrastim prophylaxis ("comparison patients") were matched (1:1) to those who received it ("pegfilgrastim patients") based on cancer, regimen, and propensity score. Odds ratios (OR) for FN-broad and narrow definitions-during the second chemotherapy cycle were estimated for comparison patients versus pegfilgrastim patients using generalized estimating equations. Results A total of 2245 comparison patients (5.3 % of source population) were matched to pegfilgrastim patients; cohorts were well-balanced on baseline characteristics. Second-cycle FN incidence proportions for comparison and pegfilgrastim patients were 3.8 versus 2.2 % based on broad definition and 2.6 versus 0.8 % based on narrow definition; corresponding OR were 1.7 (95 % CI 1.2-2.5, p = 0.002) and 3.5 (95 % CI 2.0-6.0, p < 0.001). Results were similar within cancer/regimen-subgroups and were robust when using alternative methods for confounding adjustment. Conclusions In this retrospective evaluation of cancer chemotherapy patients who received first-cycle pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice, a clinically relevant minority did not receive second-cycle prophylaxis. Second-cycle FN odds among this subset were significantly higher than they were among those who continued prophylaxis.
引用
收藏
页码:2481 / 2490
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reply: Cost-efficiency analyses for the US of biosimilar filgrastim-sndz, reference filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and pegfilgrastim with on-body injector in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia
    McBride, Ali
    Campbell, Kim
    Bikkina, Mohan
    MacDonald, Karen
    Abraham, Ivo
    Balu, Sanjeev
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 21 (06) : 606 - 609
  • [22] Cost-efficiency and expanded access of prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia: economic simulation analysis for the US of conversion from reference pegfilgrastim to biosimilar pegfilgrastim-cbqv
    MacDonald, Karen
    McBride, Ali
    Alrawashdh, Neda
    Abraham, Ivo
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 23 (12) : 1466 - 1476
  • [23] Pegfilgrastim: a review of the pharmacoeconomics for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia
    Rofail, Pierre
    Tadros, Mariam
    Ywakim, Riham
    Tadrous, Mina
    Krug, Allison
    Cosler, Leon E.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2012, 12 (06) : 699 - 709
  • [24] Budget Saving Potential of Pegfilgrastim Biosimilar for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia, in Italy
    Berto, Patrizia
    Bellone, Marco
    Sabinot, Alice
    Pinto, Carmine
    Martino, Massimo
    Generali, Daniele
    Carriero, Pier Luigi
    Sanna, Maria Domenica
    FARMECONOMIA-HEALTH ECONOMICS AND THERAPEUTIC PATHWAYS, 2022, 23 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [25] Colony-stimulating factors: Clinical evidence for treatment and prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia
    Raposo C.G.
    Marín Á.P.
    Barón M.G.
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2006, 8 (10) : 729 - 734
  • [26] Efficacy and safety of pegfilgrastim in prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in breast cancer patients.
    Xia, Wen
    Xu, Fei
    Yuan, Zhongyu
    Xu, Ruilian
    Jiang, Yi
    Wu, Zhiyong
    Lu, Qianyi
    Zheng, Qiufan
    Hong, Ruoxi
    Jiang, Kuikui
    Huang, Jiajia
    An, Xin
    Bi, XiWen
    Hong, Yun
    Pang, Danmei
    Zhang, Anqin
    Wang, Xianming
    Zhang, Qing
    Zhang, Haibo
    Wang, Shusen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (15)
  • [27] Effect of chronic comorbidities on risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia
    Chao, C.
    Rodriguez, R.
    Page, J. H.
    Yang, S. J.
    Huynh, J.
    Chia, V. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 : S302 - S302
  • [28] Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients with metastatic cancer of the breast or other sites not receiving colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis (CSF) in US clinical practice
    Weycker, Derek
    Silvia, Amanda
    Hanau, Ahuva
    Lamerato, Lois
    Richert-Boe, Kathryn
    Kaur, Manpreet
    Shah, Neel
    Hatfield, Mark
    Lyman, Gary H.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 80 (04)
  • [29] Home administration of filgrastim (Nivestim™) in primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia
    Otremba, Burkhard
    Hielscher, Carsten
    Petersen, Volker
    Petrik, Christian
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2018, 12 : 2179 - 2186
  • [30] Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy for gynaecologic malignancy
    Hashiguchi, Y.
    Fukuda, T.
    Ichimura, T.
    Matsumoto, Y.
    Yasui, T.
    Sumi, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 : S277 - S277