Cost-Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs. Abbreviated Breast MRI for Screening Women with Intermediate Risk of Breast Cancer-How Low-Cost Must MRI Be?

被引:17
|
作者
Tollens, Fabian [1 ]
Baltzer, Pascal A. T. [2 ]
Dietzel, Matthias [3 ]
Rubenthaler, Johannes [4 ]
Froelich, Matthias F. [1 ]
Kaiser, Clemens G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Univ Med Ctr Mannheim, Med Fac Mannheim, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Theodor Kutzer Ufer 1-3, D-68167 Mannheim, Germany
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Vienna Gen Hosp, Dept Biomed Imaging & Image Guided Therapy, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[3] Friedrich Alexander Univ Hosp Erlangen, Dept Radiol, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[4] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Radiol, D-80331 Munich, Germany
关键词
tomosynthesis; AB-MRI; MR-Mammography; breast cancer; intermediate-risk screening; cost-effectiveness analyses; cost-effectiveness threshold;
D O I
10.3390/cancers13061241
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Women with dense breasts have an increased risk of breast cancer and a smaller likelihood of detection in conventional mammographic screening. It is an ongoing challenge of breast imaging techniques to increase sensitivity in dense breasts. Tomosynthesis, as well as abbreviated breast MR, intends to close the gap between optimal cancer detection rate and cost-effectiveness. The aim of this economic evaluation was to analyse the cost-effectiveness of these two imaging techniques in screening women of intermediate risk of breast cancer due to dense breasts. The model-based analysis revealed that abbreviated breast MRI can be considered cost-effective, being below the willingness to pay-threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Background: Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and abbreviated breast MRI (AB-MRI) offer superior diagnostic performance compared to conventional mammography in screening women with intermediate risk of breast cancer due to dense breast tissue. The aim of this model-based economic evaluation was to analyze whether AB-MRI is cost-effective in this cohort compared to DBT. Methods: Decision analysis and Markov simulations were used to model the cumulative costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over a time horizon of 30 years. Model input parameters were adopted from recent literature. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were applied to test the stability of the model. Results: In the base-case scenario, the costs of an AB-MRI examination were defined to equal the costs of a full protocol acquisition. Two-yearly screening of women with dense breasts resulted in cumulative discounted costs of $8798 and $9505 for DBT and AB-MRI, and cumulative discounted effects of 19.23 and 19.27 QALYs, respectively, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $20,807 per QALY gained in the base-case scenario. By reducing the cost of an AB-MRI examination below a threshold of $241 in sensitivity analyses, AB-MRI would become cost-saving compared to DBT. Conclusion: In comparison to DBT, AB-MRI can be considered cost-effective up to a price per examination of $593 in screening patients at intermediate risk of breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Long-Term Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in the United States
    Lowry, Kathryn P.
    Trentham-Dietz, Amy
    Schechter, Clyde B.
    Alagoz, Oguzhan
    Barlow, William E.
    Burnside, Elizabeth S.
    Conant, Emily F.
    Hampton, John M.
    Huang, Hui
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Lee, Sandra J.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Yaffe, Martin J.
    Stout, Natasha K.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2020, 112 (06): : 582 - 589
  • [22] Cost-effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Population-based Breast Cancer Screening: A Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis
    Sankatsing, Valerie D. V.
    Juraniec, Karolina
    Grimm, Sabine E.
    Joore, Manuela A.
    Pijnappel, Ruud M.
    de Koning, Harry J.
    van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T.
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 297 (01) : 40 - 48
  • [23] Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Stout, Natasha K.
    Fryback, Dennis G.
    Acharyya, Suddhasatta
    Herman, Benjamin A.
    Hannah, Lucy G.
    Pisano, Etta D.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 148 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [24] Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening in Women on Dialysis
    Wong, Germaine
    Howard, Kirsten
    Chapman, Jeremy R.
    Craig, Jonathan C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2008, 52 (05) : 916 - 929
  • [25] Cost-effectiveness of MRI compared to mammography for breast cancer screening in a high risk population.
    Moore, S. G.
    Tumeh, J.
    Flowers, C. R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (18) : 315S - 315S
  • [26] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening for Breast Cancer: It Is Cost-effective!
    Slanetz, Priscilla J.
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 297 (01) : 49 - 50
  • [27] MAMMA - Breast cancer screening: Mammography vs. digital breast tomosynthesis
    Graewert, Stephanie
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2024, 196 (02):
  • [28] Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening (vol 323, pg 746, 2020)
    Comstock, C. E.
    Gatsonis, C.
    Newstead, G. M.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 323 (12): : 1194 - 1194
  • [29] Out-of-pocket cost of screening with breast MRI for women at high risk for breast cancer.
    Pan, I-Wen
    Oeffinger, Kevin C.
    Shih, Ya-Chen T.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (15)
  • [30] Usefulness of abbreviated breast MRI screening for women with a history of breast cancer surgery
    Bo Hwa Choi
    Nami Choi
    Mi Young Kim
    Jung-Hyun Yang
    Young Bum Yoo
    Hae Kyoung Jung
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2018, 167 : 495 - 502