Epistemo-ethical constraints on AI-human decision making for diagnostic purposes

被引:3
|
作者
Babushkina, Dina [1 ]
Votsis, Athanasios [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Fac Behav Management & Social Sci, Sect Philosophy, Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Univ Twente, Sect Governance & Technol Sustainabil, Fac Behav Management & Social Sci, Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
Hybrid epistemology; Ethics and epistemology of AI; Fuzzy concepts; Medical AI; AI in decision making;
D O I
10.1007/s10676-022-09629-y
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper approaches the interaction of a health professional with an AI system for diagnostic purposes as a hybrid decision making process and conceptualizes epistemo-ethical constraints on this process. We argue for the importance of the understanding of the underlying machine epistemology in order to raise awareness of and facilitate realistic expectations from AI as a decision support system, both among healthcare professionals and the potential benefiters (patients). Understanding the epistemic abilities and limitations of such systems is essential if we are to integrate AI into the decision making processes in a way that takes into account its applicability boundaries. This will help to mitigate potential harm due to misjudgments and, as a result, to raise the trust-understood here as a belief in reliability of-in the AI system. We aim at a minimal requirement for AI meta-explanation which should distinguish machine epistemic processes from similar processes in human epistemology in order to avoid confusion and error in judgment and application. An informed approach to the integration of AI systems into the decision making for diagnostic purposes is crucial given its high impact on health and well-being of patients.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Can AI systems meet the ethical requirements of professional decision-making in health care?
    Alan Gillies
    Peter Smith
    AI and Ethics, 2022, 2 (1): : 41 - 47
  • [32] Ethical consideration of the limitation of substitute judgement and AI preference predictors in medical decision-making
    Huang, Yuanyuan
    Cong, Yali
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2025,
  • [33] AI in knowledge sharing, which ethical challenges are raised in decision-making processes for organisations?
    Rezaei, Mojtaba
    Pironti, Marco
    Quaglia, Roberto
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2024,
  • [34] Human dignity, narrative integrity, and ethical decision making at the end of life
    Pullman, D
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2004, 20 (03) : 133 - 133
  • [35] Artificial Moral Advisors: enhancing human ethical decision-making
    Tassella, Marco
    Chaput, Remy
    Guillermin, Mathieu
    2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ETHICS IN ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY, ETHICS, 2023,
  • [36] The impact of inconsistent human annotations on AI driven clinical decision making
    Aneeta Sylolypavan
    Derek Sleeman
    Honghan Wu
    Malcolm Sim
    npj Digital Medicine, 6
  • [37] Human-Machine Cooperative AI Decision Making with Heterogeneous Data
    Blasch, Erik
    Bastian, Nathaniel D.
    Aved, Alex
    Ardiles-Cruz, Erika
    SIGNAL PROCESSING, SENSOR/INFORMATION FUSION, AND TARGET RECOGNITION XXXII, 2023, 12547
  • [38] A Quantum Probability Approach to Improving Human-AI Decision Making
    Humr, Scott
    Canan, Mustafa
    Demir, Mustafa
    ENTROPY, 2025, 27 (02)
  • [39] Human-Aligned Calibration for AI-Assisted Decision Making
    Benz, Nina L. Corvelo
    Rodriguez, Manuel Gomez
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 36 (NEURIPS 2023), 2023,
  • [40] The impact of inconsistent human annotations on AI driven clinical decision making
    Sylolypavan, Aneeta
    Sleeman, Derek
    Wu, Honghan
    Sim, Malcolm
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2023, 6 (01)