Epistemo-ethical constraints on AI-human decision making for diagnostic purposes

被引:3
|
作者
Babushkina, Dina [1 ]
Votsis, Athanasios [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Fac Behav Management & Social Sci, Sect Philosophy, Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Univ Twente, Sect Governance & Technol Sustainabil, Fac Behav Management & Social Sci, Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
Hybrid epistemology; Ethics and epistemology of AI; Fuzzy concepts; Medical AI; AI in decision making;
D O I
10.1007/s10676-022-09629-y
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper approaches the interaction of a health professional with an AI system for diagnostic purposes as a hybrid decision making process and conceptualizes epistemo-ethical constraints on this process. We argue for the importance of the understanding of the underlying machine epistemology in order to raise awareness of and facilitate realistic expectations from AI as a decision support system, both among healthcare professionals and the potential benefiters (patients). Understanding the epistemic abilities and limitations of such systems is essential if we are to integrate AI into the decision making processes in a way that takes into account its applicability boundaries. This will help to mitigate potential harm due to misjudgments and, as a result, to raise the trust-understood here as a belief in reliability of-in the AI system. We aim at a minimal requirement for AI meta-explanation which should distinguish machine epistemic processes from similar processes in human epistemology in order to avoid confusion and error in judgment and application. An informed approach to the integration of AI systems into the decision making for diagnostic purposes is crucial given its high impact on health and well-being of patients.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Epistemo-ethical constraints on AI-human decision making for diagnostic purposes
    Dina Babushkina
    Athanasios Votsis
    Ethics and Information Technology, 2022, 24
  • [2] Enhancing AI-Human Collaborative Decision-Making in Industry 4.0 Management Practices
    Alam, Shahid
    Khan, Mohammad Faisal
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 119433 - 119444
  • [3] Integrating artificial intelligence into team decision-making: Toward a theory of AI-human team effectiveness
    Carter, William
    Wynne, Kevin T.
    EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2024,
  • [4] Capable but Amoral? Comparing AI and Human Expert Collaboration in Ethical Decision Making
    Tolmeijer, Suzanne
    Christen, Markus
    Kandul, Serhiy
    Kneer, Markus
    Bernstein, Abraham
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI' 22), 2022,
  • [5] A theoretical framework to guide AI ethical decision making
    Ferrell O.C.
    Harrison D.E.
    Ferrell L.K.
    Ajjan H.
    Hochstein B.W.
    AMS Review, 2024, 14 (1-2) : 53 - 67
  • [6] The AI Needed for Ethical Decision Making Does Not Exist
    Barwise, Amelia
    Pickering, Brian
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2022, 22 (07): : 46 - 49
  • [7] ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING - SOCIETAL CONSTRAINTS - INTRODUCTION
    FULMER, T
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 1985, 18 (02) : 91 - 93
  • [8] Who should be first? How and when AI-human order influences procedural justice in a multistage decision-making process
    Jiang, Luyuan
    Qin, Xin
    Yam, Kai Chi
    Dong, Xiaowei
    Liao, Wanqi
    Chen, Chen
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (07):
  • [9] How to Use AI Ethically for Ethical Decision-Making
    Demaree-Cotton, Joanna
    Earp, Brian D.
    Savulescu, Julian
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2022, 22 (07): : 1 - 3
  • [10] Proactively Protecting Against the Singularity: Ethical Decision Making in AI
    Schrader, Dawn E.
    Ghosh, Dipayan
    IEEE SECURITY & PRIVACY, 2018, 16 (03) : 56 - 63