A systematic review of the reproductive and oncologic outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer

被引:8
|
作者
Nezhat, Farr [1 ]
Erfani, Hadi [2 ,3 ]
Nezhat, Camran [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Surg Gynecol & Oncol, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] NYU Long Isl Sch Med, NYU Langone Hosp Long Isl, Mineola, NY USA
[3] NYU Winthrop Hosp, Minimally Invas Gynecol Surg & Robot, Mineola, NY USA
[4] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Camran Nezhat Inst, Minimally Invas & Robot Surg, Woodside, CA 94061 USA
关键词
Cervical cancer; fertility-sparing surgery; pregnancy outcomes; ABDOMINAL RADICAL TRACHELECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; VAGINAL TRACHELECTOMY; OBSTETRIC OUTCOMES; PRESERVING-OPTION; CASE SERIES; SUBSEQUENT PREGNANCY; HYSTERECTOMY; PRESERVATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2022.2022-9-7
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
In this review, we aim to evaluate the current literature on reproductive and oncologic outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer (stage IA1-IB1). This is a systematic review of the existing literature using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist to report on fertility-sparing surgery and its outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer. Outcomes of interest were subsequent clinical pregnancy rate, reproductive outcomes, and cancer recurrence outcomes. Included in this systematic review were 68 studies encompassing 3,592 patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery. Of these, reproductive outcomes were reported in 1096 pregnancies. The mean clinical pregnancy rate was 53.2%. Those who underwent vaginal radical trachelectomy had the highest clinical pregnancy rate (67.5%). The mean live birth rate was 67.8% in our study. Twenty-one percent of pregnancies after fertility-sparing surgery required assisted reproductive technology. The mean cancer recurrence rate was 3.2%, and the cancer death rate was 0.6% after a median follow-up period of 40.1 months with no statistically significant difference across surgical approaches. Offering fertility-sparing surgery in early-stage cervical cancer is reasonable. Highest clinical pregnancy rate is associated with vaginal radical trachelectomy. Moreover oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive approaches were comparable with abdominal approaches. We encourage detailed preoperative counseling and multidisciplinary approach to achieve best outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 313
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Twenty years of experience with less radical fertility-sparing surgery in early-stage cervical cancer: Pregnancy outcomes
    Robova, Helena
    Rob, Lukas
    Halaska, Michael J.
    Drozenova, Jana
    Pichlik, Tomas
    Drochytek, Vit
    Hruda, Martin
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 174 : 76 - 79
  • [22] Multicenter research on tumor and pregnancy outcomes in patients with early-stage cervical cancer after fertility-sparing surgery
    Wang, Aihong
    Cui, Guanyi
    Jin, Canhui
    Wang, Ying
    Tian, Xiaoyu
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 47 (07) : 2881 - 2889
  • [23] Outcomes of the First Pregnancy After Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer
    Nitecki, Roni
    Clapp, Mark A.
    Fu, Shuangshuang
    Lamiman, Kelly
    Melamed, Alexander
    Brady, Paula C.
    Kaimal, Anjali
    Del Carmen, Marcela G.
    Woodard, Terri L.
    Meyer, Larissa A.
    Giordano, Sharon H.
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    Rauh-Hain, J. Alejandro
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 137 (06): : 1109 - 1118
  • [24] Fertility-Sparing Options for Early Cervical Cancer: Optimism for Oncologic and Obstetric Outcomes
    Garcia, Christine
    Pettit, Kate E.
    Duska, Linda R.
    CURRENT OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY REPORTS, 2016, 5 (04): : 296 - 306
  • [25] Fertility-Sparing Options for Early Cervical Cancer: Optimism for Oncologic and Obstetric Outcomes
    Christine Garcia
    Kate E. Pettit
    Linda R. Duska
    Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports, 2016, 5 (4) : 296 - 306
  • [26] Twenty years of experience with less radical fertility-sparing surgery in early-stage cervical cancer: Oncological outcomes
    Hruda, Martin
    Robova, Helena
    Rob, Lukas
    Halaska, Michael J.
    Drozenova, Jana
    Pichlik, Tomas
    Malikova, Hana
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 163 (01) : 100 - 104
  • [27] Excisional cone as fertility-sparing treatment in early-stage cervical cancer
    Fagotti, Anna
    Gagliardi, Maria Lucia
    Moruzzi, Cristina
    Carone, Vito
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Fanfani, Francesco
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 95 (03) : 1109 - 1112
  • [28] Fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: does surgical approach have an impact on disease outcomes?
    Bixel, Kristin L.
    Fowler, Jeffrey M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (05) : 417 - 419
  • [29] Outcomes of laparoscopic fertility-sparing surgery in clinically early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer
    Park, Jin-Young
    Heo, Eun Jin
    Lee, Jeong-Won
    Lee, Yoo-Young
    Kim, Tae-Joong
    Kim, Byoung-Gie
    Bae, Duk-Soo
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27 (02)
  • [30] Robotic fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer
    Azais, Henri
    Koual, Meriem
    Nguyen-Xuan, Huyen-Thu
    Achen, Guillaume
    Bentivegna, Enrica
    Bats, Anne-Sophie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2022, 32 (02) : 207 - 208