AN EXAMINATION OF THE INTERACTIONS IN FACE-TO-FACE AND ONLINE TUTORIALS

被引:0
|
作者
Eleftheriou, M. [1 ]
Ahmed, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Sharjah, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In an effort to expand tutorial services to the wider university community, the American University of Sharjah (AUS) initiated a new type of writing collaboration between tutors and students: on-line tutorials. In Spring 2011, writing center tutors began conducting tutorials using a synchronous chat program (gtalk) and a collaborative whiteboard platforms (Google Documents). Although tutors were briefed on how to use the technology for their tutorial sessions, training did not specifically address on-line tutoring pedagogical strategies. Tutors had been trained in a semester-long course using the principles and guidelines of face-to-face tutoring. This paper will present the preliminary findings of a small scale empirical study comparing synchronous conference-based online writing instruction (OWI) to face-to-face tutoring received at the AUS Writing Center. In an effort to enhance the effectiveness of the tutor training program, an examination of the differences in the interactions and types of interactions for face-to-face and online tutoring will be examined. Data will be collected from ten tutorial sessions: ten online and ten face-to-face tutoring sessions will be randomly selected for analysis. Hewett's linguistic analysis (2005) will be adapted for this analysis allowing for qualitative content analysis, and analysis of the incidence of types of questions and interactions will be analyzed statistically. This study is designed to identify best practices for on-line writing instruction for non-native speakers of English, changes that might be made in the program, and development of training for tutors to improve a collaborative model of tutoring.
引用
收藏
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Online or face-to-face? The video consultation in oncology
    Kendel, Friederike
    Speiser, Dorothee
    Magheli, Ahmed
    Feufel, Markus
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2024, 47 : 185 - 185
  • [22] Trust and Understanding in Face-to-Face and Online Negotiations
    van der Toorn, Yvonne
    van der Wijst, Per
    Damen, Debby
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS IV - INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT IN DECISION PROCESSES, 2015, 221 : 37 - 50
  • [23] Face-to-face or online psychoanalytical therapy and supervision?
    Cai, Yanyu
    Zhu, Qianwei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 275 - 275
  • [24] FACE-TO-FACE AND ONLINE TUTORING - A DIFFERENT EXPERIENCE
    HARDY, V
    TELETEACHING, 1993, 29 : 339 - 344
  • [25] ONLINE BEHANDELENVan face-to-face naar digitaal
    Marsha Baboelal
    TvPO, 2021, 16 (2) : 10 - 12
  • [26] Adolescents' real-time social and affective experiences of online and face-to-face interactions
    Achterhof, Robin
    Kirtley, Olivia J.
    Schneider, Maude
    Hagemann, Noemi
    Hermans, Karlijn S. F. M.
    Hiekkaranta, Anu P.
    Lecei, Aleksandra
    Lafit, Ginette
    Myin-Germeys, Inez
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2022, 129
  • [27] Social network dynamics of face-to-face interactions
    Zhao, Kun
    Stehle, Juliette
    Bianconi, Ginestra
    Barrat, Alain
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2011, 83 (05):
  • [28] Face-to-Face:The Semiotics of Online Teaching(or,in Praise of the Classroom)
    Massimo Leone
    LanguageandSemioticStudies, 2021, 7 (01) : 34 - 56
  • [29] Online or face-to-face? An experimental study of examiner training
    Chamberlain, Suzanne
    Taylor, Rachel
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 42 (04) : 665 - 675
  • [30] The transition from face-to-face to online CME facilitation
    Lockyer, Jocelyn
    Sargeant, Joan
    Curran, Vernon
    Fleet, Lisa
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2006, 28 (07) : 625 - 630