Outpatient versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single center clinical analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Ji, Wu [1 ]
Ding, Kai [1 ]
Li, Ling-Tang [1 ]
Wang, Dan [1 ]
Li, Ning [1 ]
Li, Jie-Shou [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Sch Med, Jinling Hosp, Res Inst Gen Surg, Nanjing 210002, Peoples R China
关键词
laparoscopic cholecystectomy; outpatient surgery; fast-track surgery; DAY-CARE; SURGERY; HEALTH; METAANALYSIS; FEASIBILITY; DISCHARGE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy (OPLC) developed in the United States and other developed countries as one of the fast-track surgeries performed in ambulatory centers. However, this practice has not been installed as a routine practice in the major general hospitals and medical centers in China. We designed this case-control study to evaluate the feasibility, benefits, and safety of OPLC. METHODS: Two hundred patients who had received laparoscopic cholecystectomy for various benign gallbladder pathologies from April 2007 to December 2008 at Jinling Hospital of Nanjing University School of Medicine were classified into two groups: OPLC group (100 patients), and control group (100), who were designated for inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy (IPLC). Data were collected for age, gender, indications for surgery, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class, operative time, blood loss during surgery, length of hospitalization, and intra- and post-operative complications. The expenses of surgery and in-hospital care were calculated and analyzed. The operative procedures and instrumentation were standardized for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and the procedures were performed by two attending surgeons specialized in laparoscopic surgery. OPLC was selected according to the standard criteria developed by surgeons in our hospital after review. Reasons for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy were recorded and documented. RESULTS: One hundred patients underwent IPLC following the selection criteria for the procedure, and 99% completed the procedure. The median operative time for IPLC was 24.0 minutes, blood loss was 16.2 ml, and the time for resuming liquid then soft diet was 10.7 hours and 22.0 hours, respectively. Only one patient had postoperative urinary infection. The mean hospital stay for IPLC was 58.2 hours, and the cost for surgery and hospitalization was 8770.5 RMB yuan on average. Followup showed that 90% of the patients were satisfied with the procedure. In the OPLC group, 99% of the patients underwent the procedure with a median operative time of 21.6 minutes and bleeding of 14.7 ml. The patients took liquid 11.3 hours then soft diet 20.1 hours after surgery. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 28.5 hours. In this group, 89% of the patients were discharged within the first 24 hours, and the remaining 11% were released within 48 hours after surgery. Two patients developed local complications. The cost for surgery and hospitalization was 7235.7 RMB yuan, which was 17.5% less than that in the IPLC group. At follow-up, 94% of the patients were satisfied with the surgery and short hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: OPLC can effectively treat a variety of benign, non-acute gallbladder diseases with shortened waiting time and postoperative hospital stay. OPLC benefits the hospital with a rapid bed turnover rate, and reduces cost for surgery and hospitalization.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 64
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A report from a single center
    Vagenas, Konstantinos
    Karamanakos, Stavros N.
    Spyropoulos, Charalambos
    Panagiotopoulos, Spyros
    Karanikolas, Menelaos
    Stavropoulos, Michalis
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 12 (24) : 3887 - 3890
  • [32] Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A single center experience
    Tiryaki, Cagri
    Bayhan, Zulfu
    Kargi, Ertugrul
    Alponat, Ahmet
    JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2016, 12 (01) : 47 - 53
  • [33] Single-center experience of laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Palanivelu, Chinnusamy
    Jani, Kalpesh
    Maheshkumar, Gobi S.
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2007, 17 (05): : 608 - 614
  • [34] Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A report from a single center
    Konstantinos Vagenas
    Stavros N Karamanakos
    Charalambos Spyropoulos
    Spyros Panagiotopoulos
    Menelaos Karanikolas
    Michalis Stavropoulos
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2006, (24) : 3887 - 3890
  • [35] Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus the classical four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective clinical trial
    Telciler, K. Emre
    Ilhan, E.
    Yakan, S.
    Cengiz, F.
    Senlikci, A.
    Hayat, E. Akturk
    MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2014, 69 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [36] Outcomes for inpatient versus outpatient cholecystectomy after acute biliary pancreatitis
    Koh, E.
    Rajadurai, A.
    Kodikara, C.
    Hui, S.
    Worland, T.
    Varma, P.
    Robertson, M.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 34 : 182 - 183
  • [37] Laparoscopic Versus Single-Incision Cholecystectomy
    Khambaty, Fatima
    Brody, Fred
    Vaziri, Khashayar
    Edwards, Claire
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 35 (05) : 967 - 972
  • [38] Single Versus Multiple Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Polat, Hasan
    Turk, Ozgur
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND ANALYTICAL MEDICINE, 2015, 6
  • [39] Laparoscopic Versus Single-Incision Cholecystectomy
    Fatima Khambaty
    Fred Brody
    Khashayar Vaziri
    Claire Edwards
    World Journal of Surgery, 2011, 35 : 967 - 972
  • [40] Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study
    Sinan, Huseyin
    Demirbas, Sezai
    Ozer, Mustafa Tahir
    Sucullu, Ilker
    Akyol, Mesut
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2012, 22 (01): : 12 - 16