Outpatient versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single center clinical analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Ji, Wu [1 ]
Ding, Kai [1 ]
Li, Ling-Tang [1 ]
Wang, Dan [1 ]
Li, Ning [1 ]
Li, Jie-Shou [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Sch Med, Jinling Hosp, Res Inst Gen Surg, Nanjing 210002, Peoples R China
关键词
laparoscopic cholecystectomy; outpatient surgery; fast-track surgery; DAY-CARE; SURGERY; HEALTH; METAANALYSIS; FEASIBILITY; DISCHARGE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy (OPLC) developed in the United States and other developed countries as one of the fast-track surgeries performed in ambulatory centers. However, this practice has not been installed as a routine practice in the major general hospitals and medical centers in China. We designed this case-control study to evaluate the feasibility, benefits, and safety of OPLC. METHODS: Two hundred patients who had received laparoscopic cholecystectomy for various benign gallbladder pathologies from April 2007 to December 2008 at Jinling Hospital of Nanjing University School of Medicine were classified into two groups: OPLC group (100 patients), and control group (100), who were designated for inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy (IPLC). Data were collected for age, gender, indications for surgery, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class, operative time, blood loss during surgery, length of hospitalization, and intra- and post-operative complications. The expenses of surgery and in-hospital care were calculated and analyzed. The operative procedures and instrumentation were standardized for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and the procedures were performed by two attending surgeons specialized in laparoscopic surgery. OPLC was selected according to the standard criteria developed by surgeons in our hospital after review. Reasons for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy were recorded and documented. RESULTS: One hundred patients underwent IPLC following the selection criteria for the procedure, and 99% completed the procedure. The median operative time for IPLC was 24.0 minutes, blood loss was 16.2 ml, and the time for resuming liquid then soft diet was 10.7 hours and 22.0 hours, respectively. Only one patient had postoperative urinary infection. The mean hospital stay for IPLC was 58.2 hours, and the cost for surgery and hospitalization was 8770.5 RMB yuan on average. Followup showed that 90% of the patients were satisfied with the procedure. In the OPLC group, 99% of the patients underwent the procedure with a median operative time of 21.6 minutes and bleeding of 14.7 ml. The patients took liquid 11.3 hours then soft diet 20.1 hours after surgery. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 28.5 hours. In this group, 89% of the patients were discharged within the first 24 hours, and the remaining 11% were released within 48 hours after surgery. Two patients developed local complications. The cost for surgery and hospitalization was 7235.7 RMB yuan, which was 17.5% less than that in the IPLC group. At follow-up, 94% of the patients were satisfied with the surgery and short hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: OPLC can effectively treat a variety of benign, non-acute gallbladder diseases with shortened waiting time and postoperative hospital stay. OPLC benefits the hospital with a rapid bed turnover rate, and reduces cost for surgery and hospitalization.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 64
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Laparoscopic cholecystectomy - Outpatient vs inpatient management
    Curet, MJ
    Contreras, M
    Weber, DM
    Albrecht, R
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2002, 16 (03): : 453 - 457
  • [3] Outcomes from Randomized Controlled Trials comparing Inpatient versus Outpatient Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Teixeira, Hugo
    Antony, Pia
    Hauswirth, Fabian
    Muller, Markus K.
    Probst, Pascal
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2023, 153 : 42S - 42S
  • [4] A meta-analysis of ambulatory versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    N. Z. Ahmad
    G. Byrnes
    S. A. Naqvi
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2008, 22 : 1928 - 1934
  • [5] Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy- A rural center experience
    Ravindran, Sharanya
    Venkat, Shruthi
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 109
  • [6] A meta-analysis of ambulatory versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Ahmad, N. Z.
    Byrnes, G.
    Naqvi, S. A.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (09): : 1928 - 1934
  • [7] LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN A FREESTANDING OUTPATIENT SURGERY CENTER
    FARHA, GJ
    GREEN, BP
    BEAMER, RL
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 1994, 4 (05): : 291 - 294
  • [8] Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) versus Conventional Three-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy; A Single Center Experience
    Anis, Saad Bin
    Ahmad, Farhan
    Rehman, Pir Muneeb
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2018, 12 (04): : 1522 - 1524
  • [9] Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)-a matched pair analysis
    Gangl, Odo
    Hofer, Wolfgang
    Tomaselli, Florian
    Sautner, Thomas
    Fuegger, Reinhold
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2011, 396 (06) : 819 - 824
  • [10] Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)—a matched pair analysis
    Odo Gangl
    Wolfgang Hofer
    Florian Tomaselli
    Thomas Sautner
    Reinhold Függer
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2011, 396