ELA 1.0 - A framework for life-cycle impact assessment developed by the Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft .A. The conceptual framework

被引:3
|
作者
Herrchen, M [1 ]
Keller, D [1 ]
Lepper, P [1 ]
Mangelsdorf, I [1 ]
Wahnschaffe, U [1 ]
机构
[1] FRAUNHOFER INST TOXICOL & AEROSOL RES, D-30625 HANNOVER, GERMANY
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0045-6535(97)00334-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft has sponsored the development of a conceptual and flexible, computer aided tool to perform the impact assessment within LCA (life cycle assessment) for technical products and processses. The developed general framework ''Ela 1.0''' (environmental loads analysis) consists of four elements: the selection of appropriate impact categories, the categorization of emissions and wastes leaving the systems as well as of resource and energy consumption, the characterization and an analysis of the results of the impact assessment. The latter compares the product-based emissions with the total of emissions of a region such as Germany, the EU or OECD countries. The framework Ela 1.0 considers the environmental categories: global warming, ozone depletion, resource and energy consumption, wastes, eutrophication (including COD and BOD as measured parameters), acidification, ecotoxicity, ozone formation and human toxicity. The latter categories are handled by listing of precursors for ozone formation, and by listing of emissions scored according to their human hazard potential. The options, possibilities and limitations of the conceptual framework are presented in part A of a series of publications. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:2589 / 2601
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development of a methodological framework for social life-cycle assessment of novel technologies
    van Haaster, Berthe
    Ciroth, Andreas
    Fontes, Joao
    Wood, Richard
    Ramirez, Andrea
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (03): : 423 - 440
  • [22] Environmental impact in a life-cycle framework: Practical approaches for decision making
    Todd, JA
    TOOLS AND METHODS FOR POLLUTION PREVENTION, 1999, 62 : 131 - 140
  • [23] Ecosystem Services in Life Cycle Assessment: A novel conceptual framework for soil
    Raymundo Pavan, Ana Laura
    Ometto, Aldo Roberto
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 643 : 1337 - 1347
  • [24] Developing a Conceptual Life-Cycle Framework for Advancing Equity in Local Capital Improvement Planning
    Le, Chau
    Moriyani, Muhammad Ali
    Le, Tuyen
    CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2024: SUSTAINABILITY, RESILIENCE, INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, AND MATERIALS DESIGN IN CONSTRUCTION, 2024, : 217 - 225
  • [25] Conceptual framework of life-cycle performance measurement: Ensuring the resilience of transport infrastructure assets
    Liu, Henry J.
    Love, Peter E. D.
    Sing, Michael C. P.
    Niu, Baozhuang
    Zhao, Jianfeng
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 77 : 615 - 626
  • [26] An integrated framework of life-cycle environmental, human health, and economic impact assessment for urban water systems
    Wang, Yu-yao
    Yeung, Chok Hang
    Hu, Xiao-meng
    Li, Xiao-yan
    WATER RESEARCH, 2025, 278
  • [27] A framework for the assessment of marine litter impacts in life cycle impact assessment
    Woods, John S.
    Verones, Francesca
    Jolliet, Olivier
    Vazquez-Rowe, Ian
    Boulay, Anne-Marie
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 129
  • [28] Life-cycle framework for assessment of site remediation options: Method and generic survey
    Diamond, ML
    Page, CA
    Campbell, M
    McKenna, S
    Lall, R
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 1999, 18 (04) : 788 - 800
  • [29] DEVELOPMENT OF A VISUAL WHOLE LIFE-CYCLE ENERGY ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK FOR BUILT ENVIRONMENT
    Dawood, Saad
    Lord, Richard
    Dawood, Nashwan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC 2009 ), VOL 1-4, 2009, : 2523 - +
  • [30] A Framework for Social Life Cycle Impact Assessment (10 pp)
    Louise Dreyer
    Michael Hauschild
    Jens Schierbeck
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2006, 11 (2) : 88 - 97