An application of rule-based forecasting to a situation lacking domain knowledge

被引:27
|
作者
Adya, M [1 ]
Armstrong, JS
Collopy, F
Kennedy, M
机构
[1] Depaul Univ, Dept Management, Chicago, IL 60604 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Weatherhead Sch, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
causal forces; expert systems; feature identification; heuristics; seasonality; time series;
D O I
10.1016/S0169-2070(00)00074-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Rule-based forecasting (RBF) uses rules to combine forecasts from simple extrapolation methods. Weights for combining the rules use statistical and domain-based features of time series. RBF was originally developed, tested, and validated only on annual data. For the M3-Competition, three major modifications were made to RBF. First, due to the absence of much in the way of domain knowledge, we prepared the forecasts under the assumption that no domain knowledge was available. This removes what we believe is one of RBF's primary advantages. We had to re-calibrate some of the rules relating to causal forces to allow for this lack of domain knowledge. Second, automatic identification procedures were used for six time-series features that had previously been identified using judgment. This was done to reduce cost and improve reliability. Third, we simplified the rule-base by removing one method from the four that were used in the original implementation. Although this resulted in some loss in accuracy, it reduced the number of rules in the rule-base from 99 to 64. This version of RBF still benefits from the use of prior findings on extrapolation, so we expected that it would be substantially more accurate than the random walk and somewhat more accurate than equal weights combining. Because most of the previous work on RBF was done using annual data, we especially expected it to perform well with annual data. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 484
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An adaptive rule-based approach for managing situation-awareness
    Cimino, Mario G. C. A.
    Lazzerini, Beatrice
    Marcelloni, Francesco
    Ciaramella, Alessandro
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (12) : 10796 - 10811
  • [32] FRAMEWORK FOR RAPID DEPLOYMENT OF RULE-BASED SITUATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
    Gopal, Rajeev
    Gopal, Rohit
    2008 IEEE MILITARY COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE: MILCOM 2008, VOLS 1-7, 2008, : 3203 - 3209
  • [33] A rule-based and a probabilistic system for situation recognition in a flight simulator
    Ehlert, PAM
    Mouthaan, QM
    Rothkrantz, LJM
    GAME-ON 2003: 4th International Conference on Intelligent Games and Simulation, 2003, : 201 - 207
  • [34] The use of physician domain knowledge to improve the learning of rule-based models for decision-support
    Ambrosino, R
    Buchanan, BG
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 1999, : 192 - 196
  • [35] A Model-Driven Approach to Situations: Situation Modeling and Rule-Based Situation Detection
    Costa, Patricia Dockhorn
    Mielke, Izon Thomas
    Pereira, Isaac
    Almeida, Joao Paulo A.
    2012 IEEE 16TH INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISE DISTRIBUTED OBJECT COMPUTING CONFERENCE (EDOC), 2012, : 154 - 163
  • [36] Fog forecasting using rule-based fuzzy inference system
    A. K. Mitra
    Sankar Nath
    A. K. Sharma
    Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2008, 36 : 243 - 253
  • [37] Automatic identification of time series features for rule-based forecasting
    Adya, M
    Collopy, F
    Armstrong, JS
    Kennedy, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2001, 17 (02) : 143 - 157
  • [38] Fog forecasting using rule-based fuzzy inference system
    Mitra, A. K.
    Nath, Sankar
    Sharma, A. K.
    PHOTONIRVACHAK-JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY OF REMOTE SENSING, 2008, 36 (03): : 243 - 253
  • [39] Rule-based scheduling of air conditioning using occupancy forecasting
    Dorokhova, Marina
    Ballif, Christophe
    Wyrsch, Nicolas
    Energy and AI, 2020, 2
  • [40] Rule-based active domain brokering for the semantic Web
    Behrends, Erik
    Fritzen, Oliver
    Knabke, Tobias
    May, Wolfgang
    Schenk, Franz
    WEB REASONING AND RULE SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4524 : 259 - +