Network dynamics of coupled oscillators and phase reduction techniques

被引:100
|
作者
Pietras, Bastian [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Daffertshofer, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Behav & Movement Sci, Amsterdam Movement Sci, Boechorststr 9, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Behav & Movement Sci, Inst Brain & Behav Amsterdam, Boechorststr 9, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Lancaster, Dept Phys, Lancaster LA1 4YB, England
[4] Bernstein Ctr Computat Neurosci, D-10115 Berlin, Germany
[5] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Math, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Oscillator networks; Phase reduction; Synchronization; Collective behavior; UNIQUE NORMAL FORMS; NEURONAL OSCILLATIONS; BIFURCATION-ANALYSIS; COMPLEX NETWORKS; AMPLITUDE DEATH; STATISTICAL-MECHANICS; RENORMALIZATION-GROUP; INITIAL CONDITIONS; RESETTING CURVES; NEURAL NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.physrep.2019.06.001
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Investigating the dynamics of a network of oscillatory systems is a timely and urgent topic. Phase synchronization has proven paradigmatic to study emergent collective behavior within a network. Defining the phase dynamics, however, is not a trivial task. The literature provides an arsenal of solutions, but results are scattered and their formulation is far from standardized. Here, we present, in a unified language, a catalogue of popular techniques for deriving the phase dynamics of coupled oscillators. Traditionally, approaches to phase reduction address the (weakly) perturbed dynamics of an oscillator. They fall into three classes. (i) Many phase reduction techniques start off with a Hopf normal form description, thereby providing mathematical rigor. There, the caveat is to first derive the proper normal form. We explicate several ways to do that, both analytically and (semi-)numerically. (ii) Other analytic techniques capitalize on time scale separation and/or averaging over cyclic variables. While appealing for their more intuitive implementation, they often lack accuracy. (iii) Direct numerical approaches help to identify oscillatory behavior but may limit an overarching view how the reduced phase dynamics depends on model parameters. After illustrating and reviewing the necessary mathematical details for single oscillators, we turn to networks of coupled oscillators as the central issue of this report. We show in detail how the concepts of phase reduction for single oscillators can be extended and applied to oscillator networks. Again, we distinguish between numerical and analytic phase reduction techniques. As the latter dwell on a network normal form, we also discuss associated reduction methods. To illustrate benefits and pitfalls of the different phase reduction techniques, we apply them point-by-point to two classic examples: networks of Brusselators and a more elaborate model of coupled Wilson-Cowan oscillators. The reduction of complex oscillatory systems is crucial for numerical analyses but more so for analytical estimates and model prediction. The most common reduction is towards phase oscillator networks that have proven successful in describing not only the transition between incoherence and global synchronization, but also in predicting the existence of less trivial network states. Many of these predictions have been confirmed in experiments. As we show, however, the phase dynamics depends to large extent on the employed phase reduction technique. In view of current and future trends, we also provide an overview of various methods for augmented phase reduction as well as for phase-amplitude reduction. We indicate how these techniques can be extended to oscillator networks and, hence, may allow for an improved derivation of the phase dynamics of coupled oscillators. (C) 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 105
页数:105
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The dynamics of network coupled phase oscillators: An ensemble approach
    Barlev, Gilad
    Antonsen, Thomas M.
    Ott, Edward
    CHAOS, 2011, 21 (02)
  • [2] Phase dynamics in nonlinear coupled oscillators
    Wang, KG
    Wang, J
    Yang, GJ
    COMMUNICATIONS IN THEORETICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 28 (02) : 179 - 186
  • [3] Dynamics of mobile coupled phase oscillators
    Uriu, Koichiro
    Ares, Saul
    Oates, Andrew C.
    Morelli, Luis G.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2013, 87 (03):
  • [4] Polaritonic network as a paradigm for dynamics of coupled oscillators
    Kalinin, Kirill P.
    Berloff, Natalia G.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2019, 100 (24)
  • [5] Dead zones and phase reduction of coupled oscillators
    Ashwin, Peter
    Bick, Christian
    Poignard, Camille
    CHAOS, 2021, 31 (09)
  • [6] Phase and amplitude dynamics of nonlinearly coupled oscillators
    Cudmore, P.
    Holmes, C. A.
    CHAOS, 2015, 25 (02)
  • [7] Slowly coupled oscillators: Phase dynamics and synchronization
    Izhikevich, EM
    Hoppensteadt, FC
    SIAM JOURNAL ON APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2003, 63 (06) : 1935 - 1953
  • [8] Plasticity and learning in a network of coupled phase oscillators
    Seliger, P
    Young, SC
    Tsimring, LS
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2002, 65 (04): : 7 - 041906
  • [9] Data synchronization in a network of coupled phase oscillators
    Miyano, Takaya
    Tsutsui, Takako
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2007, 98 (02)
  • [10] Data synchronization in a network of coupled phase oscillators
    Department of Micro System Technology, Ritsumeikan University, 1-1-1, Noji-higashi, Kusatsu, Shiga 525-8577, Japan
    不详
    不详
    Phys Rev Lett, 1600, 2