Modeling Bias Error in 4D Flow MRI Velocity Measurements

被引:8
|
作者
Rothenberger, Sean M. [1 ]
Zhang, Jiacheng [2 ]
Brindise, Melissa C. [2 ]
Schnell, Susanne [3 ]
Markl, Michael [4 ]
Vlachos, Pavlos P. [1 ,2 ]
Rayz, Vitaliy L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Weldon Sch Biomed Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Sch Mech Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] Univ Greifswald, Inst Phys, D-17489 Greifswald, Germany
[4] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Velocity measurement; Measurement uncertainty; Mathematical models; Spatial resolution; Numerical models; Fluid flow measurement; Hemodynamics; magnetic resonance velocimetry (MRV); partial volume effects; phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI); systematic error; WALL SHEAR-STRESS; PHASE-CONTRAST MRI; IN-VIVO; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSMS; BLOOD-FLOW; PATTERNS; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1109/TMI.2022.3149421
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
We present a model to estimate the bias error of 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) velocity measurements. The local instantaneous bias error is defined as the difference between the expectation of the voxel's measured velocity and actual velocity at the voxel center. The model accounts for bias error introduced by the intra-voxel velocity distribution and partial volume (PV) effects. We assess the intra-voxel velocity distribution using a 3D Taylor Series expansion. PV effects and numerical errors are considered using a Richardson extrapolation. The model is applied to synthetic Womersley flow and in vitro and in vivo 4D flow MRI measurements in a cerebral aneurysm. The bias error model is valid for measurements with at least 3.75 voxels across the vessel diameter and signal-to-noise ratio greater than 5. All test cases exceeded this diameter to voxel size ratio with diameters, isotropic voxel sizes, and velocity ranging from 3-15mm, 0.5-1mm, and 0-60cm/s, respectively. The model accurately estimates the bias error in voxels not affected by PV effects. In PV voxels, the bias error is an order of magnitude higher, and the accuracy of the bias error estimation in PV voxels ranges from 67.3% to 108% relative to the actual bias error. The bias error estimated for in vivo measurements increased two-fold at systole compared to diastole in partial volume and non-partial volume voxels, suggesting the bias error varies over the cardiac cycle. This bias error model quantifies 4D flow MRI measurement accuracy and can help plan 4D flow MRI scans.
引用
收藏
页码:1802 / 1812
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quantification of left atrial flow velocity distribution in atrial fibrillation using 4D flow MRI
    Jacob U Fluckiger
    Jeffrey J Goldberger
    Daniel C Lee
    Jason Ng
    Richard Lee
    Andrew B Olsen
    James Carr
    Michael Markl
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 15 (Suppl 1)
  • [22] Blood Flow Velocity Pulsatility and Arterial Diameter Pulsatility Measurements of the Intracranial Arteries Using 4D PC-MRI
    Kees M. van Hespen
    Hugo J. Kuijf
    Jeroen Hendrikse
    Peter R. Luijten
    Jaco J. M. Zwanenburg
    Neuroinformatics, 2022, 20 : 317 - 326
  • [23] Blood Flow Velocity Pulsatility and Arterial Diameter Pulsatility Measurements of the Intracranial Arteries Using 4D PC-MRI
    van Hespen, Kees M.
    Kuijf, Hugo J.
    Hendrikse, Jeroen
    Luijten, Peter R.
    Zwanenburg, Jaco J. M.
    NEUROINFORMATICS, 2022, 20 (02) : 317 - 326
  • [24] Aortic pulse wave velocity measurements with undersampled 4D flow-sensitive MRI: comparison with 2D and algorithm determination
    Wentland, Andrew L.
    Wieben, Oliver
    Francois, Chris J.
    Boncyk, Christina
    Del Rio, Alejandro Munoz
    Johnson, Kevin M.
    Grist, Thomas M.
    Frydrychowicz, Alex
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 37 (04) : 853 - 859
  • [25] Deep Learning Automated Background Phase Error Correction for Abdominopelvic 4D Flow MRI
    You, Sophie
    Masutani, Evan M.
    Alley, Marcus T.
    Vasanawala, Shreyas S.
    Taub, Pam R.
    Liau, Joy
    Roberts, Anne C.
    Hsiao, Albert
    RADIOLOGY, 2022, 302 (03) : 584 - 592
  • [26] Estimation of Global Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity by Flow-Sensitive 4D MRI
    Markl, Michael
    Wallis, Wolf
    Brendecke, Stefanie
    Simon, Jan
    Frydrychowicz, Alex
    Harloff, Andreas
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2010, 63 (06) : 1575 - 1582
  • [27] Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity Evaluated by 4D Flow MRI Across the Adult Lifespan
    Jarvis, Kelly
    Scott, Michael B.
    Soulat, Gilles
    Elbaz, Mohammed S. M.
    Barker, Alex J.
    Carr, James C.
    Markl, Michael
    Ragin, Ann
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2022, 56 (02) : 464 - 473
  • [28] Segmentation-Free Velocity Field Super-Resolution on 4D Flow MRI
    Levilly, Sebastien
    Moussaoui, Said
    Serfaty, Jean-Michel
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2024, 33 : 5637 - 5649
  • [29] Optimization of 4D flow MRI velocity field in the aorta with divergence-free smoothing
    Qi Gao
    Xingli Liu
    Hongping Wang
    Peng Wu
    Mansu Jin
    RunJie Wei
    Wei Wang
    Zhaozhuo Niu
    Shihua Zhao
    Fei Li
    Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2021, 59 : 2237 - 2252
  • [30] Image-Based Background Phase Error Correction in 4D Flow MRI Revisited
    Busch, Julia
    Giese, Daniel
    Kozerke, Sebastian
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2017, 46 (05) : 1516 - 1525