A Cyptocurrency Risk-Return Analysis for Bull and Bear Regimes

被引:3
|
作者
Barkai, Ittai [1 ,2 ]
Shushi, Tomer [3 ]
Yosef, Rami [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Business Adm, Beer Sheva, Israel
[2] OLSPS Marine, Cape Town, South Africa
[3] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Guilford Glazer Fac Business & Management, Dept Business Adm, Actuarial Sci & Risk Management Program, Beer Sheva, Israel
[4] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Finance & Actuarial Sci, Beer Sheva, Israel
[5] Dept Business Adm, Insurance & Finance Specialty, Beer Sheva, Israel
[6] Israel Assoc Value Estimat & Financial Actuaries, Rishon Leziyyon, Israel
来源
JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS | 2021年 / 24卷 / 01期
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
BITCOIN; CRYPTOCURRENCY; PRICE; DOLLAR; MARKET; GOLD;
D O I
10.3905/jai.2021.1.131
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
In this article, the authors develop a new analytical lens through which to examine the risk-return profiles of bitcoin, litecoin, ripple, and ethereum. Their focus is to understand better the price behavior of individual cryptocurrencies and their influence on one another. To achieve this, they segment each cryptocurrency's time series of returns into disparate bull and bear regimes. They then examine the nature and extent of overlap between these regimes and whether they change over time. They also collect and plot several indicative distributed-denial-of-service attacks against the time series to investigate their possible impact on regime change episodes. Their findings shed light on previously unexplored systemic risk indicators within the cryptomarket as a whole and on the relationship between specific cryptocurrency pairs. These findings enhance the risk management toolkit for investors by revealing potential price behavior contagion patterns between cryptocurrencies pertinent to blended portfolio management. Furthermore, the authors' approach serves as a blueprint for additional research into regime-type overlap within the cryptomarket.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 118
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Investor sentiment and the risk-return tradeoff
    Amiri, Mohamed Marouen
    Naoui, Kamel
    Derbali, Abdelkader
    Ben Sassi, Mounir
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 7 (04)
  • [32] MANAGERIALISM AND RISK-RETURN PERFORMANCE - COMMENT
    BOWER, RS
    SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1974, 40 (03) : 505 - 506
  • [33] A RISK-RETURN PARADOX FOR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
    BOWMAN, EH
    SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1980, 21 (03): : 17 - 31
  • [34] Institutional herding and risk-return relationship
    Huang, Teng-Ching
    Wu, Ching-Chih
    Lin, Bing-Huei
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 (06) : 2073 - 2080
  • [35] Financial planning and risk-return profiles
    Graf, Stefan
    Kling, Alexander
    Russ, Jochen
    EUROPEAN ACTUARIAL JOURNAL, 2012, 2 (01) : 77 - 104
  • [36] MANAGERIALISM AND RISK-RETURN PERFORMANCE - REPLY
    BOUDREAUX, KJ
    SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1974, 40 (03) : 507 - 508
  • [37] Reinsurance and Insurers' Risk-Return Profile
    Lei, Yu
    JOURNAL OF INSURANCE ISSUES, 2019, 42 (01) : 37 - 65
  • [38] Exploring longitudinal risk-return relationships
    Andersen, Torben J.
    Bettis, Richard A.
    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (08) : 1135 - 1145
  • [39] Financial planning and risk-return profiles
    Stefan Graf
    Alexander Kling
    Jochen Ruß
    European Actuarial Journal, 2012, 2 (1) : 77 - 104
  • [40] CORPORATE DIVERSIFICATION, ECONOMIES OF SCOPE, AND THE RISK-RETURN - RETURN RELATIONSHIP
    Sakhartov, Arkadiy V.
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2024, 49 (03): : 536 - 561