Comparative analysis of soil-sampling methods used in precision agriculture

被引:6
|
作者
Ribeiro Goncalves, Jose Roberto Moreira [1 ]
Silva Ferraz, Gabriel Araujo E. [2 ]
Reynaldo, Etore Francisco [3 ]
Marin, Diego Bedin [2 ]
Ponciano Ferraz, Patricia Ferreira [2 ]
Perez-Ruiz, Manuel [4 ]
Rossi, Giuseppe [5 ]
Vieri, Marco [6 ]
Sarri, Daniele [6 ]
机构
[1] Laureate Int IBMR, Dept Architecture & Engn, Barra Da Tijuca, RJ, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Lavras, Dept Agr Engn, Univ Campus, Lavras, MG, Brazil
[3] Syngenta, Uberlandia, MG, Brazil
[4] Univ Seville, Area Agroforestry Engn, Tech Sch Agr Engn ETSIA, Seville, Spain
[5] Univ Florence, Dept Agr Food Environm & Forestry, Florence, Italy
[6] Univ Florence, Biosyst Engn Div, Dept Agr Food Environm & Forestry DAGRI, Piazzale Cascine 15, I-50144 Florence, Italy
关键词
Management zones; grid sampling; environmental impact; electrical conductivity; soil proximity sensor; SPATIAL VARIABILITY; MANAGEMENT; PHOSPHORUS; ADOPTION; SIZE; CROP;
D O I
10.4081/jae.2021.1117
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare three different soil-sampling methods used in Precision Agriculture and their environmental impact on agricultural production. The sampling methods used were: zone management by elevation, grid sampling (GS) and sampling oriented by apparent soil electrical conductivity (OS). Three different fields were tested. When the recommendations were compared, a significant difference among the suggested doses was observed. This indicated the need to improve the soilsampling techniques, since there were doubts about input deficits or overdoses, regardless of the technology studied. The GS method was the most environmentally viable alternative for phosphorus (P) compared to other methods and the OS presented as the better option for potassium (K) and nitrogen (N). However, the use of soil sensors appeared to be a viable technology that needs further improvement in order to improve productivity and, hence, economic and environmental benefits.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sampling in precision agriculture: A software for navigation in field activities
    Lamb, Juliano Rodrigo
    Araujo, Everton Coimbra
    Bazzi, Claudio Leones
    Maggi, Marcio Furlan
    SUSTAINABLE COMPUTING-INFORMATICS & SYSTEMS, 2022, 36
  • [42] Adaptive Sampling and Actuation for POMDPs: Application to Precision Agriculture
    Antunes, D. J.
    Beumer, R. M.
    De Molengraft, M. J. G. Van
    Heemels, W. P. M. H.
    2022 IEEE 61ST CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2022, : 2399 - 2404
  • [43] Comparative analysis of ACTH and corticosterone sampling methods in rats
    Vahl, TP
    Ulrich-Lai, YM
    Ostrander, MM
    Dolgas, CM
    Elfers, EE
    Seeley, RJ
    D'Alessio, DA
    Herman, JP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 2005, 289 (05): : E823 - E828
  • [44] On-the-go soil sensors for precision agriculture
    Adamchuk, VI
    Hummel, JW
    Morgan, MT
    Upadhyaya, SK
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2004, 44 (01) : 71 - 91
  • [45] Soil reflectance sensing for determining soil properties in precision agriculture
    Thomasson, JA
    Sui, R
    Cox, MS
    Al-Rajehy, A
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 2001, 44 (06): : 1445 - 1453
  • [46] Precision of systematic sampling and transitive methods
    Kiêu, K
    Souchet, S
    Istas, J
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 1999, 77 (02) : 263 - 279
  • [47] Soil sampling mobile platform for Agriculture 4.0
    Lukowska, Aneta
    Tomaszuk, Piotr
    Dzierzek, Kazimierz
    Magnuszewski, Lukasz
    2019 20TH INTERNATIONAL CARPATHIAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ICCC), 2019, : 269 - 272
  • [48] A comparative analysis of the performance of various GNSS positioning concepts dedicated to precision agriculture
    Kowalczyk, Wiktoria Zofia
    Hadas, Tomasz
    REPORTS ON GEODESY AND GEOINFORMATICS, 2024, 117 (01) : 11 - 20
  • [49] A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THREE METHODS USED FOR RNA QUANTITATION
    Schipor, Sorina
    Vladoiu, Suzana
    Baciu, Ancuta Elena
    Niculescu, Ana Maria
    Caragheorgheopol, Andra
    Iancu, Iulia
    Plesa, Adriana
    Popescu, A. I.
    Manda, Dana
    ROMANIAN REPORTS IN PHYSICS, 2016, 68 (03) : 1178 - 1188
  • [50] A Review on Precision Agriculture and Its Farming Methods
    Monisha, M.
    Dhanalakshmi, T. G.
    RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 6 (03): : 1142 - 1153