Evaluation of helical computed tomography scan parameters for vascular imaging

被引:3
|
作者
Reynolds, DM
Hazle, JD
Johnston, DA
Charnsangavej, C
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Ctr, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Sect Diagnost Imaging Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Ctr, Dept Biomath, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
computed tomography; angiography; helical CT;
D O I
10.1118/1.598178
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Helical x-ray computed tomography (hCT) is the volume acquisition of image data in which the data set represents a series of projections obtained in a helical spatial distribution. Data acquisition times and spatial resolution are determined largely by two user defined parameters-collimation and pitch. Each combination of pitch and collimation results in a slice profile which can be considered as the apparent slice thickness. Careful selection of pitch and collimation allows the acquisition of up to 20 cm of axial data in a breathold or first pass of bolus contrast material. This makes helical CT an excellent technique for angiographic (CTA) studies. Additionally, slices can be reconstructed at any interval to reduce partial volume averaging, minimizing the beading artifacts seen in maximum intensity projections (MIP) when interslice resolution is poor. We have evaluated a range of collimation and pitches for clinical CTA. Additionally, three reconstruction filters were included to determine the optimal frequency (spatial) properties for these techniques. Objective and subjective analyses were performed. We found pitches of up to 1.5:1 to be acceptable for all collimations. For a given scan length (z direction), selection of thinner collimation and higher pitch resulted in better SNR and observer scoring for angiographic presentations. (C) 1998 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 182
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Computed tomography in the evaluation of vascular rings and slings
    Etesami M.
    Ashwath R.
    Kanne J.
    Gilkeson R.C.
    Rajiah P.
    Insights into Imaging, 2014, 5 (4) : 507 - 521
  • [32] Evaluation of renal vascular variations with computed tomography
    Azad Hekimoglu
    Onur Ergun
    African Journal of Urology, 2022, 28
  • [33] Evaluation of renal vascular variations with computed tomography
    Hekimoglu, Azad
    Ergun, Onur
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 28 (01)
  • [34] Helical computed tomographic scan in the evaluation of mediastinal gunshot wounds - Discussion
    Moore, EE
    Schwab, CW
    Ivatury, R
    Nagy, KK
    Hanpeter, DE
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2000, 49 (04): : 694 - 695
  • [35] Imaging Evaluation in Otosclerosis: Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography and Computed Tomography
    Berrettini, Stefano
    Ravecca, Francesca
    Volterrani, Duccio
    Neri, Emanuele
    Forli, Francesca
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2010, 119 (04): : 215 - 224
  • [36] Unenhanced helical computed tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain
    Ahmad, NA
    Ather, MH
    Rees, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 10 (06) : 287 - 292
  • [37] Unenhanced helical computed tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain
    Hamm, M
    Wawroschek, F
    Weckermann, D
    Knöpfle, E
    Häckel, T
    Häuser, H
    Krawczak, G
    Harzmann, R
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 39 (04) : 460 - 465
  • [38] Introduction of helical computed tomography affects patient selection for V/Q lung scan
    Zettinig, G
    Baudrexel, S
    Leitha, T
    NUKLEARMEDIZIN-NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2002, 41 (02): : 91 - 94
  • [39] Dynamic helical computed tomography scan accurately detects hemorrhage in patients with pelvic fracture
    Pereira, S
    O'Brien, DP
    Luchette, FA
    Choe, KA
    Lim, E
    Davis, K
    Hurst, JM
    Johannigman, JA
    Frame, SB
    SURGERY, 2000, 128 (04) : 678 - 684
  • [40] EVALUATION OF THE HEAD MULTISLICE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCAN IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
    Zadravec, Dijana
    Greguric, Tomislav
    Smoljan, Mia
    Mustapic, Matej
    Milicic, Gordana
    Jovic, Andrijana
    Rubil, Danijela
    Tomasovic, Daniela
    Kes, Vanja Basic
    ACTA CLINICA CROATICA, 2017, 56 (02) : 284 - 291