Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Proton Beam Therapy for Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

被引:51
|
作者
Kim, Tae Hyun [1 ]
Park, Joong-Won [1 ]
Kim, Yeon-Joo [1 ]
Kim, Bo Hyun [1 ]
Woo, Sang Myung [1 ]
Moon, Sung Ho [1 ]
Kim, Sang Soo [1 ]
Koh, Young-Hwan [1 ]
Lee, Woo Jin [1 ]
Park, Sang Jae [1 ]
Kim, Joo-Young [1 ]
Kim, Dae Yong [1 ]
Kim, Chang-Min [1 ]
机构
[1] Res Inst & Hosp, Natl Canc Ctr, Ctr Liver Canc, Goyang 410769, South Korea
来源
CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT | 2015年 / 47卷 / 01期
关键词
Hepatocellular carcinoma; Proton therapy; Radiotherapy; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CARBON ION RADIOTHERAPY; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; ARTERIAL EMBOLIZATION; ETHANOL INJECTION; PORTA-HEPATIS; CLASSIFICATION; PROGNOSIS; TOXICITY; ADJACENT;
D O I
10.4143/crt.2013.218
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this study is to determine the optimal dose of proton beam therapy (PBT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HOC) patients. Materials and Methods Inoperable HOC patients who had naive, recurrent, or residual tumor to treatment were considered eligible for PBT. Patients received PBT with 60 GyE in 20 fractions (dose level 1; equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions [EQD2], 65 GyE(10)); 66 GyE in 22 fractions (dose level 2; EQD2, 71.5 GyE(10)); or 72 GyE in 24 fractions (dose level 3; EQD2, 78 GyE(10)). Dose-limiting toxicity was determined by grade >= 3 acute toxicity. Results Twenty-seven patients were enrolled; eight, seven, and 12 patients were treated with dose levels 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Overall, treatment was well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities. The complete response (CR) rates of primary tumors after PBT for dose levels 1, 2, and 3 were 62.5% (5/8), 57.1% (4/7), and 100% (12/12), respectively (p=0.039). The 3- and 5-year local progression-free survival (LPFS) rates among 26 patients, excluding one patient who underwent liver transplantation after PBT due to its probable significant effect on disease control, were 79.9% and 63.9%, respectively, and the 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 56.4% and 42.3%, respectively. The 3-year LPFS rate was significantly higher in patients who achieved CR than in those who did not (90% vs. 40%, p=0.003). Conclusion PBT is safe and effective and an EQD2 >= 78 GyE(10) should be delivered for achievement of local tumor control.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 45
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Hepatic Metastases
    William Rule
    Robert Timmerman
    Liyue Tong
    Ramzi Abdulrahman
    Jeffrey Meyer
    Thomas Boike
    Roderich E. Schwarz
    Paul Weatherall
    L. Chinsoo Cho
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2011, 18 : 1081 - 1087
  • [42] PHASE-I DOSE-ESCALATION STUDY OF TUMOR-NECROSIS-FACTOR AND RADIATION
    HALLAHAN, DE
    WEICHSELBAUM, RR
    RUBIN, SJ
    VIJAYKUMAR, S
    SAMUELS, B
    PHILLIPS, R
    KUFE, D
    OBRIEN, S
    VOKES, E
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 27 : 184 - 184
  • [43] Optimal phase I dose-escalation trial designs in oncology-A simulation study
    Gerke, Oke
    Siedentop, Harald
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (26) : 5329 - 5344
  • [44] Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Hepatic Metastases
    Rule, William
    Timmerman, Robert
    Tong, Liyue
    Abdulrahman, Ramzi
    Meyer, Jeffrey
    Boike, Thomas
    Schwarz, Roderich E.
    Weatherall, Paul
    Cho, L. Chinsoo
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 (04) : 1081 - 1087
  • [45] A phase I dose-escalation study of intravenous panobinostat in patients with lymphoma and solid tumors
    Sharma, Sunil
    Beck, Joachim
    Mita, Monica
    Paul, Sofia
    Woo, Margaret M.
    Squier, Margaret
    Gadbaw, Brian
    Prince, H. Miles
    INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 2013, 31 (04) : 974 - 985
  • [46] A phase I, dose-escalation study of volasertib combined with nintedanib in advanced solid tumors
    de Braud, F.
    Cascinu, S.
    Spitaleri, G.
    Pilz, K.
    Clementi, L.
    Liu, D.
    Sikken, P.
    De Pas, T.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26 (11) : 2341 - 2346
  • [47] Incoherent dose-escalation in phase I trials using the escalation with overdose control approach
    Graham M. Wheeler
    Statistical Papers, 2018, 59 : 801 - 811
  • [48] ZD0473 pharmacokinetics in Japanese patients: a Phase I dose-escalation study
    Murakami, H
    Tamura, T
    Yamada, Y
    Yamamoto, N
    Ueda, Y
    Shimoyama, T
    Saijo, N
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 38 : S1 - S5
  • [49] 5-fluorouracil-based chemoradiation in unresectable pancreatic carcinoma: Phase I-II dose-escalation study
    Morganti, AG
    Valentini, V
    Macchia, G
    Mattiucci, GC
    Costamagna, G
    Deodato, F
    Smaniotto, D
    Luzi, S
    Balducci, M
    Barbi, S
    Perri, V
    Trodella, L
    Cellini, N
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (05): : 1454 - 1460
  • [50] A phase I dose-escalation and dose-expansion study of brontictuzumab in subjects with selected solid tumors
    Ferrarotto, R.
    Eckhardt, G.
    Patnaik, A.
    LoRusso, P.
    Faoro, L.
    Heymach, J. V.
    Kapoun, A. M.
    Xu, L.
    Munster, P.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29 (07) : 1561 - 1568