Risk factors for single crowns supported by short (6-mm) implants in the posterior region: A prospective clinical and radiographic study

被引:41
|
作者
Villarinho, Eduardo Aydos [1 ]
Triches, Diego Fernandes [1 ]
Alonso, Fernando Rizzo [1 ]
Mendonca Mezzomo, Luis Andre [2 ]
Teixeira, Eduardo Rolim [1 ]
Arai Shinkai, Rosemary Sadami [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontifical Catholic Univ Rio Grande do Sul PUCRS, Sch Dent, Ave Ipiranga 6681,Predio 6, BR-90619900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Sch Dent, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
关键词
crown-to-implant ratio; dental implants; peri-implant bone loss; prospective clinical study; prosthetic complications; short implants; SHORT DENTAL IMPLANTS; BONE LOSS; LESS-THAN-10; MM; SURVIVAL; RATES; RATIO; COMPLICATIONS; RESTORATIONS; METAANALYSIS; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1111/cid.12494
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe use of short implants is still not a consensus for challenging clinical situations, such as unfavorable crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio. PurposeThis prospective study evaluated the rates of prosthetic complications and implant failure, the mean marginal bone loss of 6-mm dental implants with single crowns in posterior regions and the potential risk factors. Materials and MethodsForty-six dental implants, 6-mm long and 4.1-mm wide, were placed in the posterior region in 20 patients. Patients were clinically and radiographically examined after the restoration with single crowns and on a yearly basis. Potential risk factors (arch, bruxism, maximum bite force, anatomical and clinical C/I ratios, and occlusal table area) were analyzed according to the following outcomes: implant survival, bone loss, and prosthetic complications. ResultsThe mean follow-up time was 459 (16-57) months. There was no early loss of implants. After prosthetic loading, 4 implants were lost (2 in the mandible and 2 in the maxilla; 91.3% survival), and there were 13 prosthetic complications (28.3%), yielding a 65.2% success rate. The frailty term showed a 95% greater chance of loss in the mandible than the maxilla. Mean peri-implant bone loss was of 0.2 +/- 0.4 mm, 0.1 +/- 0.2 mm, 0.1 +/- 0.3 mm, and 0.2 +/- 0.4 mm in the first, second, third, and fourth years, respectively, with a mean cumulative loss of 0.3 +/- 0.5 mm at 48 months. In the multilevel model, the effects of the clinical C/I ratio and time were significant for bone loss (P<.001). It was estimated that a mean bone loss of 0.1 mm is associated with both a one-unit increase in time (12 months) and a 0.1 increase in the clinical C/I ratio. The other potential risk factors showed no significant relationship with the outcomes. ConclusionsThe 6-mm implants supporting single crowns performed well, but the mandible shows a higher risk of failure. The time and clinical C/I ratio are predictors for bone loss.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 680
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of 6-mm and 11-mm dental implants in the posterior region supporting fixed dental prostheses: 5-year results of an open multicenter randomized controlled trial
    Gulje, Felix L.
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    Abrahamsson, Ingemar
    Barwacz, Christopher A.
    Chen, Stephen
    Palmer, Paul J.
    Zadeh, Homayoun
    Stanford, Clark M.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2021, 32 (01) : 15 - 22
  • [42] Short (5-and 7-mm long) porous implants in the posterior atrophic maxilla: A 6-year report of a prospective study
    Perelli, Michele
    Abundo, Roberto
    Corrente, Giuseppe
    Saccone, Carlo
    IMPLANTOLOGIE, 2013, 21 (03): : 269 - 277
  • [43] All-ceramic single crowns supported by zirconia implants: 5-year results of a prospective multicenter study
    Spies, Benedikt C.
    Balmer, Marc
    Jung, Ronald E.
    Sailer, Irena
    Vach, Kirstin
    Kohal, Ralf-Joachim
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (05) : 466 - 475
  • [44] Long-term follow-up of single crowns supported by short, moderately rough implants-A prospective 10-year cohort study
    Rossi, Fabio
    Lang, Niklaus P.
    Ricci, Emanuele
    Ferraioli, Lorenzo
    Baldi, Niccolo
    Botticelli, Daniele
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (12) : 1212 - 1219
  • [45] Single-crown restorations supported by short implants (6 mm) compared with standard-length implants (13 mm) in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized, controlled clinical trial
    Nielsen, Helle Baungaard
    Schou, Soren
    Bruun, Niels Henrik
    Starch-Jensen, Thomas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2021, 7 (01)
  • [46] Single-crown restorations supported by short implants (6 mm) compared with standard-length implants (13 mm) in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized, controlled clinical trial
    Helle Baungaard Nielsen
    Søren Schou
    Niels Henrik Bruun
    Thomas Starch-Jensen
    International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 7
  • [47] Immediate Restoration of Single Tapered Implants with Nonoccluding Provisional Crowns: A 5-Year Clinical Prospective Study
    Lang, Lisa A.
    Turkyilmaz, Ilser
    Edgin, Wendell A.
    Verrett, Ronald
    Garcia, Lily T.
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (02) : 248 - 258
  • [48] Retrospective Study of Short Versus Standard Posterior Implants and Analysis of Implant Failure Risk Factors
    Wang, Yu
    Jiang, Jin
    Guan, Ye
    Si, Misi
    He, Fuming
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2021, 36 (06) : 1129 - +
  • [49] Single tooth crowns supported on hydroxyapatite coated endosseous dental implants: a prospective 5-year study on twenty subjects
    Davis, DM
    Watson, RM
    Packer, ME
    INTERNATIONAL DENTAL JOURNAL, 2004, 54 (04) : 201 - 205
  • [50] A Retrospective Multicenter Study on Short Implants With a Laser-Microgrooved Collar (≤7.5 mm) in Posterior Edentulous Areas: Radiographic and Clinical Results up to 3 to 5 Years
    Zuffetti, Francesco
    Testarelli, Luca
    Bertani, Pio
    Vassilopoulos, Spyridon
    Testori, Tiziano
    Guarnieri, Renzo
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 78 (02) : 217 - 227