Hybrid preemptive scheduling of MPI applications on the Grids

被引:0
|
作者
Bouteiller, A [1 ]
Botiziane, HL [1 ]
Herault, T [1 ]
Lemarinier, P [1 ]
Cappello, F [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 11, LRI, INRIA, Orsay, France
关键词
D O I
10.1109/GRID.2004.39
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Time sharing between cluster resources in Grid is a major issue in cluster and Grid integration. Classical Grid architecture involves a higher level scheduler which submits non overlapping jobs to the independent batch schedulers of each cluster of the Grid. The sequentiality induced by this approach does not fit with the expected number of users and job heterogeneity of the Grids. Time sharing techniques address this issue by allowing simultaneous executions of many applications on the same resources. Co-scheduling and gang scheduling are the two best known techniques for time sharing cluster resources. Co-scheduling relies on the operating system of each node to schedule the processes of every application. Gang scheduling ensures that the same application is scheduled on all nodes simultaneously. Previous work has proven that co-scheduling techniques outperforms gang scheduling when physical memory is not exhausted. In this paper, we introduce a new hybrid sharing technique providing checkpoint based explicit memory management. It consists in co-scheduling parallel applications within a set, until the memory capacity of the node is reached, and using gang scheduling related techniques to switch from one set to another one. We compare experimentally the merits of the three solutions: Co, Gang and Hybrid Scheduling, in the context of out-of-core computing, which is likely to occur in the Grid context, where many users share the same resources. The experiments show that the hybrid solution is as efficient as the co-scheduling technique when the physical memory is not exhausted, and is more efficient than gang scheduling and co-scheduling when physical memory is exhausted.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 137
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] A GA(TS) Hybrid Algorithm for Scheduling in Computational Grids
    Xhafa, Fatos
    Gonzalez, Juan A.
    Dahal, Keshav P.
    Abraham, Ajith
    HYBRID ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2009, 5572 : 285 - +
  • [23] A Hybrid Metaheuristic Algorithm for Job Scheduling on Computational Grids
    Pooranian, Zahra
    Shojafar, Mohammad
    Tavoli, Reza
    Singhal, Mukesh
    Abraham, Ajith
    INFORMATICA-JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATICS, 2013, 37 (02): : 157 - 164
  • [24] A Hybrid Algorithm for DAG Application Scheduling on Computational Grids
    Bouali, Lyes
    Oukfif, Karima
    Bouzefrane, Samia
    Oulebsir-Boumghar, Fatima
    MOBILE, SECURE, AND PROGRAMMABLE NETWORKING, MSPN 2015, 2015, 9395 : 63 - 77
  • [25] Characterizing MPI and Hybrid MPI plus Threads Applications at Scale: Case Study with BFS
    Amer, Abdelhalim
    Lu, Huiwei
    Balaji, Pavan
    Matsuoka, Satoshi
    2015 15TH IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CLUSTER, CLOUD AND GRID COMPUTING, 2015, : 1075 - 1083
  • [26] Automatic performance analysis of hybrid MPI/OpenMP applications
    Wolf, F
    Mohr, B
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE, 2003, 49 (10-11) : 421 - 439
  • [27] Automatic performance analysis of hybrid MPI/OpenMP applications
    Wolf, F
    Mohr, B
    ELEVENTH EUROMICRO CONFERENCE ON PARALLEL, DISTRIBUTED AND NETWORK-BASED PROCESSING, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 13 - 22
  • [28] Preemptive hybrid scheduling scheme for optical packet switch with class differentiation
    Il, GY
    Abdullah, MK
    Dimyati, K
    8th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, Vols 1-3: TOWARD THE ERA OF UBIQUITOUS NETWORKS AND SOCIETIES, 2006, : U1261 - U1263
  • [29] Cost-Minimizing Preemptive Scheduling of MapReduce Workloads on Hybrid Clouds
    Qiu, Xuanjia
    Yeow, Wai Leong
    Wu, Chuan
    Lau, Francis C. M.
    2013 IEEE/ACM 21ST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON QUALITY OF SERVICE (IWQOS), 2013, : 213 - 218
  • [30] PREEMPTIVE VS NON PREEMPTIVE SCHEDULING IN WMN
    Khamayseh, Yaser
    Mardini, Wail
    Al-Tarazi, Noor
    2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (MSE 2010), VOL 2, 2010, : 192 - 195