Flash Glucose Monitoring and Patient Satisfaction: A Meta-Review of Systematic Reviews

被引:12
|
作者
Diez-Fernandez, Ana [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dolores Rodriguez-Huerta, Maria [4 ]
Miron-Gonzalez, Ruben [5 ]
Alberto Laredo-Aguilera, Jose [3 ,6 ,7 ]
Maria Martin-Espinosa, Noelia [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Ctr Estudios Sociosanitarios, Cuenca 16071, Spain
[2] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Fac Enfermeria Cuenca, Cuenca 16071, Spain
[3] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Dept Enfermeria Fisioterapia & Terapia Ocupac, Campus Univ S-N, Albacete 02071, Spain
[4] La Princesa Univ Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Madrid 28006, Spain
[5] Univ Alcala, Dept Nursing & Physiotherapy, Community Care & Social Determinants Hlth Res Grp, Alcala De Henares 28805, Spain
[6] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Grp Invest Multidisciplinar Cuidados IMCU, Campus Fabr Armas,Av Carlos III 21, Toledo 45071, Spain
[7] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Fac Fisioterapia & Enfermeria, Campus Fabr Armas,Av Carlos III 21, Toledo 45071, Spain
关键词
flash glucose monitoring; quality of life; patients’ satisfaction; diabetes mellitus; meta-review; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; TYPE-2 DIABETES PATIENTS; SENSING TECHNOLOGY; HYPOGLYCEMIA; MULTICENTER; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph18063123
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) systems have been suggested to have clinical beneficial effects in patients with diabetes mellitus, although their improvements in terms of quality of life (QoL) and patients' satisfaction are not always addressed or are considered a secondary outcome. Thus, the aim of this meta-review is to establish the benefits of FGM in terms of patients' satisfaction and QoL in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients using evidence from past systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Major databases were searched for systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) that assessed the satisfaction or QoL of type 1 or 2 diabetes patients using FGM compared with other glucose monitoring systems. The quality of the included systematic reviews was addressed with the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) tool. Six systematic reviews (including two meta-analyses) were included in the meta-review. Evidence suggests that FGM systems seem to improve patients' satisfaction and QoL compared with self-monitoring of blood glucose, although the high variability in the measurement tools, the clinical significance and the quality of the systematic reviews included do not allow us to state FGM benefits with any certainty. Further research, including high-quality randomised clinical trials, differentiating the needs of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients and focusing on psychosocial benefits for these patients is needed to optimise clinical decisions between patients and professionals by developing the right health technology assessment for FGM systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient Satisfaction of Telemedicine Remote Patient Monitoring: A Systematic Review
    Rhoden, Parker A.
    Bonilha, Heather
    Harvey, Jillian
    TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2022, 28 (09) : 1332 - 1341
  • [22] Supporting self-management for people with hypertension: a meta-review of quantitative and qualitative systematic reviews
    Schwappach, Anna
    Pearce, Gemma
    Parke, Hannah
    Epiphaniou, Eleni
    Pinnock, Hilary
    Taylor, Stephanie J. C.
    LANCET, 2014, 384 : 68 - 68
  • [23] Preoperative and postoperative recommendations to surgical wound care interventions: A systematic meta-review of Cochrane reviews
    Gillespie, Brigid M.
    Walker, Rachel M.
    McInnes, Elizabeth
    Moore, Zena
    Eskes, Anne M.
    O'Connor, Tom
    Harbeck, Emma
    White, Codi
    Scott, Ian A.
    Vermeulen, Hester
    Chaboyer, Wendy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2020, 102
  • [24] Supporting self-management for people with hypertension: a meta-review of quantitative and qualitative systematic reviews
    Shahaj, Orjola
    Denneny, Diarmuid
    Schwappach, Anna
    Pearce, Gemma
    Epiphaniou, Eleni
    Parke, Hannah L.
    Taylor, Stephanie J. C.
    Pinnock, Hilary
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2019, 37 (02) : 264 - 279
  • [25] Risk of suicide and suicidal behavior in refugees. A meta-review of current systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    Bevione, Francesco
    Panero, Matteo
    Abbate-Daga, Giovanni
    Cossu, Giulia
    Carta, Mauro Giovanni
    Preti, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2024, 177 : 287 - 298
  • [26] Gaps in the evidence on improving social care outcomes: findings from a meta-review of systematic reviews
    Dickson, Kelly
    Sutcliffe, Katy
    Rees, Rebecca
    Thomas, James
    HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2017, 25 (04) : 1287 - 1303
  • [27] Correction to Risk of bias and open science practices in systematic reviews of educational effectiveness: A meta-review
    Nordstrom, T.
    Kalmendal, A.
    Batinovic, L.
    REVIEW OF EDUCATION, 2024, 12 (01):
  • [28] Meta-review of high-quality systematic reviews of interventions in key areas of liaison psychiatry
    Ruddy, R
    House, A
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 187 : 109 - 120
  • [29] Experiences of Self-Management Support Following a Stroke: A Meta-Review of Qualitative Systematic Reviews
    Pearce, Gemma
    Pinnock, Hilary
    Epiphaniou, Eleni
    Parke, Hannah L.
    Heavey, Emily
    Griffiths, Christopher J.
    Greenhalgh, Trish
    Sheikh, Aziz
    Taylor, Stephanie J. C.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (12):
  • [30] Is compensation "bad for health"? A systematic meta-review
    Spearing, Natalie M.
    Connelly, Luke B.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2011, 42 (01): : 15 - 24