Flash Glucose Monitoring and Patient Satisfaction: A Meta-Review of Systematic Reviews

被引:12
|
作者
Diez-Fernandez, Ana [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dolores Rodriguez-Huerta, Maria [4 ]
Miron-Gonzalez, Ruben [5 ]
Alberto Laredo-Aguilera, Jose [3 ,6 ,7 ]
Maria Martin-Espinosa, Noelia [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Ctr Estudios Sociosanitarios, Cuenca 16071, Spain
[2] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Fac Enfermeria Cuenca, Cuenca 16071, Spain
[3] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Dept Enfermeria Fisioterapia & Terapia Ocupac, Campus Univ S-N, Albacete 02071, Spain
[4] La Princesa Univ Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Madrid 28006, Spain
[5] Univ Alcala, Dept Nursing & Physiotherapy, Community Care & Social Determinants Hlth Res Grp, Alcala De Henares 28805, Spain
[6] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Grp Invest Multidisciplinar Cuidados IMCU, Campus Fabr Armas,Av Carlos III 21, Toledo 45071, Spain
[7] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Fac Fisioterapia & Enfermeria, Campus Fabr Armas,Av Carlos III 21, Toledo 45071, Spain
关键词
flash glucose monitoring; quality of life; patients’ satisfaction; diabetes mellitus; meta-review; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; TYPE-2 DIABETES PATIENTS; SENSING TECHNOLOGY; HYPOGLYCEMIA; MULTICENTER; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph18063123
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) systems have been suggested to have clinical beneficial effects in patients with diabetes mellitus, although their improvements in terms of quality of life (QoL) and patients' satisfaction are not always addressed or are considered a secondary outcome. Thus, the aim of this meta-review is to establish the benefits of FGM in terms of patients' satisfaction and QoL in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients using evidence from past systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Major databases were searched for systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) that assessed the satisfaction or QoL of type 1 or 2 diabetes patients using FGM compared with other glucose monitoring systems. The quality of the included systematic reviews was addressed with the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) tool. Six systematic reviews (including two meta-analyses) were included in the meta-review. Evidence suggests that FGM systems seem to improve patients' satisfaction and QoL compared with self-monitoring of blood glucose, although the high variability in the measurement tools, the clinical significance and the quality of the systematic reviews included do not allow us to state FGM benefits with any certainty. Further research, including high-quality randomised clinical trials, differentiating the needs of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients and focusing on psychosocial benefits for these patients is needed to optimise clinical decisions between patients and professionals by developing the right health technology assessment for FGM systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Not all systematic reviews are systematic: a meta-review of the quality of current systematic reviews and meta-analyses for remote monitoring in heart failure
    Clark, R. A.
    Conway, A.
    Inglis, S. C.
    Horton-Breshears, M.
    Cleland, J. G. F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2013, 12 : S229 - S229
  • [2] Not all systematic reviews are systematic: a meta-review of the quality of systematic reviews for non-invasive remote monitoring in heart failure
    Conway, Aaron
    Inglis, Sally C.
    Chang, Anne M.
    Horton-Breshears, Margaret
    Cleland, John G. F.
    Clark, Robyn A.
    JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2013, 19 (06) : 326 - 337
  • [3] A systematic meta-review of systematic reviews on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
    Chaulagain, Ashmita
    Lyhmann, Ingvild
    Halmoy, Anne
    Widding-Havneraas, Tarjei
    Nyttingnes, Olav
    Bjelland, Ingvar
    Mykletun, Arnstein
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 66 (01)
  • [4] Virtual reality in stroke recovery: a meta-review of systematic reviews
    Khan, Ammar
    Imam, Yahia Z.
    Muneer, Mohamed
    Al Jerdi, Salman
    Gill, Sumanjit K.
    Bioelectronic Medicine, 2024, 10 (01)
  • [5] Turmeric / curcumin and health outcomes: A meta-review of systematic reviews
    Rolfe, Vivien
    Mackonochie, Marion
    Mills, Simon
    MacLennan, Euan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 40
  • [6] Psychosocial adjustment to multiple sclerosis diagnosis: A meta-review of systematic reviews
    Topcu, Gogem
    Griffiths, Holly
    Bale, Clare
    Trigg, Emma
    Clarke, Sara
    Potter, Kristy-Jane
    Mhizha-Murira, Jacqueline R.
    Drummond, Avril
    Evangelou, Nikos
    Fitzsimmons, Deborah
    das Nair, Roshan
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2020, 82
  • [7] A meta-review of systematic reviews on psychosocial adjustment to multiple sclerosis diagnosis
    Topcu, G.
    Griffiths, H.
    Bale, C.
    Drummond, A.
    Evangelou, N.
    Clarke, S.
    Trigg, E.
    Martin, K. -J.
    Fitzsimmons, D.
    dasNair, R.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2018, 24 : 733 - 734
  • [8] A systematic meta-review of systematic reviews about interprofessional collaboration: facilitators, barriers, and outcomes
    Wei, Holly
    Horns, Phyllis
    Sears, Samuel F.
    Huang, Kun
    Smith, Christopher M.
    Wei, Trent L.
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2022, 36 (05) : 735 - 749
  • [9] What is a psychological intervention? A meta-review of narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses in patients with cancer
    Hodges, L.
    Kleiboer, A.
    Sharpe, M.
    Velikova, G.
    Ramirez, A.
    Richardson, A.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2009, 18 (03) : 319 - 319
  • [10] Systematic reviews of empirical literature on bioethical topics: Results from a meta-review
    Mertz, Marcel
    Nobile, Helene
    Kahrass, Hannes
    NURSING ETHICS, 2020, 27 (04) : 960 - 978