The influence of algorithms on political and dating decisions

被引:18
|
作者
Agudo, Ujue [1 ]
Matute, Helena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Deusto, Bilbao, Spain
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 04期
关键词
VOTE CHOICE; EXPOSURE; FAMILIARITY; ATTRACTIVENESS; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0249454
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence algorithms are ubiquitous in daily life, and this is motivating the development of some institutional initiatives to ensure trustworthiness in Artificial Intelligence (AI). However, there is not enough research on how these algorithms can influence people's decisions and attitudes. The present research examines whether algorithms can persuade people, explicitly or covertly, on whom to vote and date, or whether, by contrast, people would reject their influence in an attempt to confirm their personal freedom and independence. In four experiments, we found that persuasion was possible and that different styles of persuasion (e.g., explicit, covert) were more effective depending on the decision context (e.g., political and dating). We conclude that it is important to educate people against trusting and following the advice of algorithms blindly. A discussion on who owns and can use the data that makes these algorithms work efficiently is also necessary.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] INFLUENCE OF SCIENTISTS ON POLITICAL DECISIONS IN AGE OF CO-EXISTENCE AND INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY
    MEDOW, P
    COEXISTENCE, 1966, 3 (01) : 71 - 73
  • [32] Dating Preferences and Meeting Opportunities in Mate Choice Decisions
    Belot, Michele
    Francesconi, Marco
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 2013, 48 (02) : 474 - 508
  • [33] Supporting Online Dating Decisions with a Prompted Discussion Interface
    Zytko, Douglas
    Jones, Quentin
    Regalado, Victor
    Grandhi, Sukeshini A.
    COMPANION OF THE 2018 ACM CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK AND SOCIAL COMPUTING (CSCW'18), 2018, : 353 - 356
  • [34] Asymptotic algorithms of demodulation with soft decisions
    Bogdanovich, VA
    Shevchenko, ME
    RADIOTEKHNIKA I ELEKTRONIKA, 1997, 42 (07): : 812 - 817
  • [35] Investment decisions using genetic algorithms
    Kassicieh, SK
    Paez, TL
    Vora, G
    THIRTIETH HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, VOL 5: ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY, 1997, : 484 - 490
  • [36] Algorithms in selection decisions: Effective, but unappreciated
    Rabinovitch, Hagai
    Budescu, David V.
    Meyer, Yoella Bereby
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2024, 37 (02)
  • [37] Greedy Algorithms for Sequential Sensing Decisions
    Hajishirzi, Hannaneh
    Shirazi, Afsaneh
    Choi, Jaesik
    Amir, Eyal
    21ST INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (IJCAI-09), PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 1908 - 1915
  • [38] Justice behind the labels: How political affiliation and gender influence the decisions of the Ohio Supreme Court
    Vineyard, J
    Wiest, C
    Guinigundo, B
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI LAW REVIEW, 2004, 72 (03) : 1159 - 1255
  • [40] Political Ideology and Racial Preferences in Online Dating
    Anderson, Ashton
    Goel, Sharad
    Huber, Gregory
    Malhotra, Neil
    Watts, Duncan J.
    SOCIOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 1 : 28 - 40