Helpful explanatory models for somatoform symptoms (HERMES): study protocol of a randomised mixed-methods pilot trial

被引:3
|
作者
Huesing, Paul [1 ]
Loewe, Bernd [1 ]
Hartman, Tim C. Olde [2 ]
Frostholm, Lisbeth [3 ]
Weigel, Angelika [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Psychosomat Med & Psychotherapy, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Primary & Community Care, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Res Clin Funct Disorders & Psychosomat, Aarhus, Denmark
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
psychiatry; general medicine (see internal medicine); primary care; preventive medicine; MEDICALLY UNEXPLAINED SYMPTOMS; PERSISTENT SOMATIC SYMPTOMS; BODILY DISTRESS DISORDER; CRITERIA SCALE SSD-12; PRIMARY-CARE; PATIENTS PERCEPTIONS; PHYSICAL SYMPTOMS; VALIDITY; SOMATIZATION; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044244
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Persistent somatic symptoms (PSS) are common both in the general population and primary care. They are bothersome in terms of psychological and somatic symptom burden. Health professionals often struggle with communication, as there is a lack of scientifically supported explanatory models for PSS or a focus merely on somatic aspects of the complaints, which both frustrate patients' needs. The objective of the present study is therefore to develop a psychoeducational intervention based on a current evidence-based explanatory model, to examine its feasibility and form the basis for a large-scale randomised controlled trial. Methods and analysis In a randomised controlled mixed-methods pilot trial, 75 adult psychosomatic outpatients with PSS (duration of symptoms >= 6 months) and accompanying psychological (Somatic Symptom B-Criteria Scale total score >= 18) and somatic symptom burden (Patient Health Questionnaire-15 score >10) and no prior psychosomatic treatment will be eligible. Participants will be presented with either the explanatory model without (intervention group 1, n=25) or with elements of personalisation (intervention group 2, n=25). Participants in the control group (n=25) will receive information on current PSS guidelines. Participants will be blinded to group assignment and interventions will be shown on tablet computers at the outpatient clinic. After 1 month, qualitative follow-up telephone interviews will be conducted. As primary outcomes, mean changes in psychological and somatic symptom burden will quantitatively be compared between groups, respectively. Behavioural change mechanisms and feasibility of the three interventions will be evaluated using quantitative and qualitative measures. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval has been granted by the medical ethics board of the Hamburg Medical Chamber (PV5653). Results from this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Neuropsychological evaluation and rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis (NEuRoMS): protocol for a mixed-methods, multicentre feasibility randomised controlled trial
    Gogem Topcu
    Laura Smith
    Jacqueline R. Mhizha-Murira
    Nia Goulden
    Zoë Hoare
    Avril Drummond
    Deborah Fitzsimmons
    Nikos Evangelou
    Klaus Schmierer
    Emma C. Tallantyre
    Paul Leighton
    Kimberley Allen-Philbey
    Andrea Stennett
    Paul Bradley
    Clare Bale
    James Turton
    Roshan das Nair
    Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 8
  • [32] Autoregulated heavy slow resistance training combined with radial shockwave therapy for plantar heel pain: Protocol for a mixed-methods pilot randomised controlled trial
    Burton, Ian
    MUSCULOSKELETAL CARE, 2021, 19 (03) : 319 - 330
  • [33] Applying an osteopathic intervention to improve mild to moderate mental health symptoms: a mixed-methods feasibility randomised trial
    Hope-Bell, Josh
    Draper-Rodi, Jerry
    Edwards, Darren J.
    CHIROPRACTIC & MANUAL THERAPIES, 2024, 32 (01)
  • [34] Models of maternal and child healthcare for African refugees: protocol for an exploratory, mixed-methods study
    Njue, Carolyne
    Hayen, Andrew
    Dawson, Angela J.
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (06):
  • [35] Recess and children with disabilities: A mixed-methods pilot study
    McNamara, Lauren
    Lakman, Yana
    Spadafora, Natalie
    Lodewyk, Ken
    Walker, Meaghan
    DISABILITY AND HEALTH JOURNAL, 2018, 11 (04) : 637 - 643
  • [36] Community Health Workers as Mental Health Paraprofessionals:Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Pilot Feasibility Study
    Moyce, Sally
    Crawford, Cassidy
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2024, 13
  • [37] Patients' acceptance of explanatory models for persistent somatic symptoms: A qualitative analysis within the HERMES study
    Junge, Magdalena
    Huesing, Paul
    Loewe, Bernd
    Weigel, Angelika
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2023, 170
  • [38] Evaluation of a surgical supervision model in three African countries—protocol for a prospective mixed-methods controlled pilot trial
    Chiara Pittalis
    Ruairi Brugha
    Gloria Crispino
    Leon Bijlmakers
    Gerald Mwapasa
    Chris Lavy
    Grace Le
    Mweene Cheelo
    John Kachimba
    Eric Borgstein
    Nyengo Mkandawire
    Adinan Juma
    Paul Marealle
    Kondo Chilonga
    Jakub Gajewski
    Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 5
  • [39] Kazakhstan's young flagship university: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study
    Hwami, Munyaradzi
    COGENT EDUCATION, 2023, 10 (01):
  • [40] The implementation of teledentistry training in orthodontic practice: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study
    Peanchitlertkajorn, Supakit
    Ngamdachakij, Charn
    Wongwatjana, Boonsita
    Jongpatranichpunth, Wichayaporn
    Sipiyaruk, Kawin
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)