Differences of hydraulic conductivities from pumping and draining tests with intensity effects

被引:4
|
作者
Xu, Jinpeng [1 ]
Chen, Mingyue [1 ]
Hong, Huang [2 ]
Xu, Xinqi [3 ]
Liu, Bo [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Resources & Earth Sci, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Wanbei Coal Elect Grp Co Ltd, Natl Mine Water Disaster Control Engn Res Ctr, Suzhou 234000, Anhui, Peoples R China
[3] Zibo Coal Min Grp Co Ltd, Zibo 255120, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Hydraulic conductivity; Intensity effect; Pumping test; Draining test; Effective fissure rate; PARTIAL PENETRATION; FLOW; BARRIER; STORAGE; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124165
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Pumping tests are the most commonly used method for obtaining hydraulic conductivities in mine hydrogeological work, while draining tests are a new hydrogeological test method in recent years. However, the hydraulic conductivities obtained from draining tests are different in some extent from those from pumping tests. Sometimes the differences are even of an order of magnitude. In this paper, the draining tests are carried out in 5 coal mines, the corresponding pumping test data are collected, the data are compared and analyzed in several aspects, and the fractured aquifer is taken as an example for theoretical analysis. After analysis and discussion, it is found the main reason for the differences is intensity effects. Since the amount of the water used in draining tests is much larger than that in pumping tests, some of the ineffective fissures occupied by capillary water and bound water are converted into effective fissures, resulting in an increase in hydraulic conductivities. Therefore, intensity effects on hydraulic conductivities are of great theoretical significance in hydrogeological research.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Using electrical resistivity logs and short duration pumping tests to estimate hydraulic conductivity profiles
    Kaleris, Vassilios K.
    Ziogas, Alexandros, I
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2020, 590
  • [42] A COMPARISON OF PUMPING AND SLUG TESTS FOR ESTIMATING THE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY OF UNWEATHERED WISCONSIAN AGE TILL IN IOWA
    JONES, L
    GROUND WATER, 1993, 31 (06) : 896 - 904
  • [43] Joint Estimation of Hydraulic and Poroelastic Parameters from a Pumping Test
    Berg, Steven J.
    Illman, Walter A.
    Mok, Chin Man W.
    GROUNDWATER, 2015, 53 (05) : 759 - 770
  • [44] Comparison of transmissivities from MRS and pumping tests in Denmark
    Nielsen, M. Ryom
    Hagensen, T. F.
    Chalikakis, K.
    Legchenko, A.
    NEAR SURFACE GEOPHYSICS, 2011, 9 (02) : 211 - 223
  • [45] ANALYSIS OF DATA FROM PUMPING TESTS IN ANISOTROPIC AQUIFERS
    HANTUSH, MS
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1966, 71 (02): : 421 - +
  • [46] RECOVERY ANALYSIS FROM PUMPING TESTS WITH STEPPED DISCHARGE
    KAWECKI, MW
    GROUND WATER, 1993, 31 (04) : 585 - 592
  • [47] Determination of hydraulic conductivity from piezocone tests
    Wang, Qiang
    Tong, Liyuan
    Liu, Songyu
    Wang, Qiang
    GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION 4, VOLS I AND II, 2013, : 475 - 480
  • [48] Study on the hydraulic parameter differences between pumping and recharge in a confined aquifer of a soft soil area
    Zheng, Gang
    Li, Qinghan
    Cheng, Xuesong
    Liu, Xiaomin
    Jia, Jianwei
    Jiao, Ying
    Ha, Da
    HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 31 (04) : 947 - 965
  • [49] Analytical 2D model to invert hydraulic pumping tests in fractured rocks with fractal behavior
    Delay, F
    Porel, G
    Bernard, S
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2004, 31 (16) : L165011 - 4
  • [50] New graphical methods for estimating aquifer hydraulic parameters using pumping tests with exponentially decreasing rates
    Zhuang, Chao
    Zhou, Zhifang
    Zhan, Hongbin
    Wang, Jinguo
    Li, Yabing
    Dou, Zhi
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2019, 33 (17) : 2314 - 2322