Differences of hydraulic conductivities from pumping and draining tests with intensity effects

被引:4
|
作者
Xu, Jinpeng [1 ]
Chen, Mingyue [1 ]
Hong, Huang [2 ]
Xu, Xinqi [3 ]
Liu, Bo [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Resources & Earth Sci, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Wanbei Coal Elect Grp Co Ltd, Natl Mine Water Disaster Control Engn Res Ctr, Suzhou 234000, Anhui, Peoples R China
[3] Zibo Coal Min Grp Co Ltd, Zibo 255120, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Hydraulic conductivity; Intensity effect; Pumping test; Draining test; Effective fissure rate; PARTIAL PENETRATION; FLOW; BARRIER; STORAGE; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124165
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Pumping tests are the most commonly used method for obtaining hydraulic conductivities in mine hydrogeological work, while draining tests are a new hydrogeological test method in recent years. However, the hydraulic conductivities obtained from draining tests are different in some extent from those from pumping tests. Sometimes the differences are even of an order of magnitude. In this paper, the draining tests are carried out in 5 coal mines, the corresponding pumping test data are collected, the data are compared and analyzed in several aspects, and the fractured aquifer is taken as an example for theoretical analysis. After analysis and discussion, it is found the main reason for the differences is intensity effects. Since the amount of the water used in draining tests is much larger than that in pumping tests, some of the ineffective fissures occupied by capillary water and bound water are converted into effective fissures, resulting in an increase in hydraulic conductivities. Therefore, intensity effects on hydraulic conductivities are of great theoretical significance in hydrogeological research.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EFFECTS OF IMPROPER CHARACTERIZATION OF AQUIFER THICKNESS ON ESTIMATES OF HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY FROM PUMPING TESTS
    HUDAK, PF
    GROUND WATER MONITORING AND REMEDIATION, 1993, 13 (02): : 113 - 117
  • [2] Comparison of hydraulic conductivities by grain-size analysis, pumping, and slug tests in Quaternary gravels, NE Slovenia
    Pucko, Tatjana
    Verbovsek, Timotej
    OPEN GEOSCIENCES, 2015, 7 (01): : 308 - 317
  • [3] Estimation of hydraulic parameters from pumping tests in a multiaquifer system
    Ha, Da
    Zheng, Gang
    Zhou, Haizuo
    Zeng, Chaofeng
    Zhang, Huihui
    UNDERGROUND SPACE, 2020, 5 (03) : 210 - 222
  • [4] Hydraulic conductivities of low permeability sediments inferred from a triple pumping test and observed vertical gradients
    Lebbe, L
    Van Meir, N
    GROUND WATER, 2000, 38 (01) : 76 - 88
  • [5] Comparison of hydraulic conductivity values obtained from aquifer pumping tests and conservative tracer tests
    Niemann, WL
    Rovey, CW
    GROUND WATER MONITORING AND REMEDIATION, 2000, 20 (03): : 122 - 128
  • [6] Absolute hydraulic conductivity estimates from aquifer pumping and tracer tests in a stratified aquifer
    Thorbjarnarson, KW
    Huntley, D
    McCarty, JJ
    GROUND WATER, 1998, 36 (01) : 87 - 97
  • [7] Frequency dependent hydraulic properties estimated from oscillatory pumping tests in an unconfined aquifer
    Rabinovich, Avinoam
    Barrash, Warren
    Cardiff, Michael
    Hochstetler, David L.
    Bakhos, Tania
    Dagan, Gedeon
    Kitanidis, Peter K.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2015, 531 : 2 - 16
  • [8] TRANSEPITHELIAL OSMOLALITY DIFFERENCES, HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITIES, AND VOLUME ABSORPTION IN THE PROXIMAL TUBULE
    SCHAFER, JA
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 52 : 709 - 726
  • [9] Exploratory use of periodic pumping tests for hydraulic characterization of faults
    Cheng, Yan
    Renner, Joerg
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 212 (01) : 543 - 565
  • [10] HYDRAULIC TESTS FOR RECONSTRUCTING THE PUMPING STATIONS ON THE MOSCOW CANAL.
    Bestuzheva, N.P.
    Hydrotechnical Construction, 1987, 21 (06): : 345 - 349