Assessment of Radiation Oncology Nurse Education in the United States

被引:6
|
作者
Moskalenko, Marina [1 ]
Zaccone, Jennifer [1 ]
Fiscelli, Cheryl A. [1 ]
Wieworka, Jennifer [2 ]
Anderson, Roberta [2 ]
Choflet, Amanda [3 ]
Martens, Shanel [1 ]
Goodman, Karyn A. [4 ]
Golden, Daniel W. [5 ]
Nath, Sameer K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] San Diego State Univ, Sch Nursing, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[4] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[5] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiat Cellular Oncol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Diseases; -; Oncology; Curricula; Surveys; Radiotherapy;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.01.031
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Nurses in the radiation oncology (RO) clinic have a critical role in the management of patients receiving radiation therapy. However, limited data exist regarding the exposure of nurses to RO during training and the current educational needs of practicing RO nurses. This study assesses nurses' prior RO education, participation in national training efforts, and perceived educational needs. Methods and Materials: A web-based survey using a 5-point Likert-type scale was distributed to RO nurses at 3 academic medical centers. Questions focused on prior education experiences, clinical areas of strength/weakness, and perceived value of future educational interventions. Likert-type scores are reported as median (interquartile range), and a Kruskal-Wallis test was conducted to assess for significant differences in responses. Results: The survey response rate was 39 of 54 (72%). Respondents were 90% female and trained at 30 nursing schools in 17 states. Only 5% of nurses reported a curriculum in nursing school with RO content, and nearly all (97%) received their RO education on the job. Forty-one percent of nurses completed the Oncology Nursing Society radiation therapy certificate course, and only 5% completed the American Society for Radiation Oncology nursing module. Nurses felt most confident in the overall management of patients with breast (4 [3-4]), prostate (4 [3-5]), and central nervous system (4 [3-4]) cancers and least confident for lymphoma (3 [2-4]), gynecologic (3 [2-4]), and head and neck cancers (3 [2-4]; P < .01). Nurses rated didactic lectures from physicians (5 [3-5]), shadowing RO residents (4 [3-5]), and working with simulation therapists (4 [35]) as valuable components to include in a training curriculum (P = .08). Conclusions: Nursing school exposure to RO is limited, and only a minority of RO nurses complete RO-specific training or certification available from national organizations. This study identifies several areas of perceived clinical nursing strengths and weaknesses that can be used to inform the design of future RO nursing educational programs. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 671
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The American Society for Radiation Oncology Workforce Taskforce Review of the United States Radiation Oncology Workforce Analysis
    Shah, Chirag
    Mohindra, Pranshu
    Arnone, Anna
    Bates, James Edward
    Mattes, Malcolm D.
    Campbell, Shauna
    Fontanilla, Hiral P.
    Sim, Austin J.
    Sharp, Hadley J.
    Kelly, Patrick
    Mantz, Constantine
    Eichler, Thomas
    Sandler, Howard
    Fields, Emma
    Pinnix, Chelsea C.
    Vapiwala, Neha
    Haffty, Bruce
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 116 (03): : 484 - 490
  • [22] The Impact of an Introductory Radiation Oncology Curriculum (IROC) for Radiation Oncology Trainees Across the United States and Canada
    Jimenez, Rachel B.
    Johnson, Andrew
    Padilla, Laura
    Yechieli, Raphael
    Forman, Rachel
    Horick, Nora
    Thomas, Horatio
    Gunther, Jillian R.
    Olivier, Kenneth
    Golden, Daniel W.
    Fields, Emma
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 107 (03): : 408 - 416
  • [23] TRAINING IN ACADEMIC RADIATION ONCOLOGY IN THE UNITED-STATES - A REPORT TO THE INTER SOCIETY COUNCIL FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGY
    PARKER, RG
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1990, 18 (05): : 1245 - 1248
  • [24] Burnout in United States Academic Chairs of Radiation Oncology Programs
    Kusano, Aaron S.
    Thomas, Charles R., Jr.
    Bonner, James A.
    DeWeese, Theodore L.
    Formenti, Silvia C.
    Hahn, Stephen M.
    Lawrence, Theodore S.
    Mittal, Bharat B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 88 (02): : 363 - 368
  • [25] Recent Trends in Radiation Oncology Fellowship Training in the United States
    Mohamad, Osama
    Meyer, Jeffrey J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (03): : 539 - 540
  • [26] A survey of surface imaging use in radiation oncology in the United States
    Padilla, Laura
    Havnen-Smith, Amanda
    Cervino, Laura
    Al-Hallaq, Hania A.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (12): : 70 - 77
  • [27] A Survey of Surface Imaging Use in Radiation Oncology in the United States
    Padilla, L.
    Havnen-Smith, A.
    Cervino, L.
    Al-Hallaq, H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E556 - E556
  • [28] QUALITY ASSURANCE IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY IN THE UNITED-STATES 1988
    HANKS, GE
    CANCER, 1989, 64 (01) : 223 - 225
  • [29] Supply and Demand for Radiation Oncology in the United States: A Resident Perspective
    Burt, Lindsay M.
    Trifiletti, Daniel M.
    Nabavizadeh, Nima
    Katz, Leah M.
    Morris, Zachary S.
    Royce, Trevor J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 97 (02): : 225 - 227
  • [30] THE STRUCTURE OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY PRACTICES IN THE CONTINENTAL UNITED-STATES
    DIAMOND, JJ
    HANKS, GE
    KRAMER, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1988, 14 (03): : 547 - 548