A protocol for patients with cardiovascular implantable devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): should defibrillation threshold testing be performed post-(MRI)

被引:43
|
作者
Burke, Peter Thomas [1 ]
Ghanbari, Hamid [1 ]
Alexander, Patrick B. [1 ]
Shaw, Michael K. [1 ]
Daccarett, Marcos [1 ]
Machado, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Providence Hosp, Providence Heart Inst, Southfield, MI 48075 USA
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; MRI; Cardiac implantable electronic device; CIED; Pacemaker; ICD; Defibrillator threshold testing; Defibrillation safety margin testing; DSMT; CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATORS; CARDIAC-PACEMAKERS; 1.5; TESLA; VENTRICULAR-FIBRILLATION; PERMANENT PACEMAKERS; SCIENTIFIC STATEMENT; IN-VITRO; SAFETY; CONVERSION; 1.5-TESLA;
D O I
10.1007/s10840-009-9463-y
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIED) has not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Recent data suggests MRI as a relative rather than absolute contraindication in CIED patients. Recently, the American Heart Association has recommended defibrillation threshold testing (DFTT) in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients undergoing MRI. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of a protocol for MRI in CIED patients, incorporating the new recommendations on DFTT. Consecutive patients with CIED undergoing MRI were included. The protocol consisted of continuous monitoring during imaging, device interrogation pre- and post-MRI, reprogramming of the pacemaker to an asynchronous mode in pacemaker-dependent (PMD) patients and a non-tracking/sensing mode for non-PMD patients. All tachyarrhythmia therapies were disabled. Devices were interrogated for lead impedance, battery life, pacing, and sensing thresholds. All patients with ICD underwent DFTT/defibrillator safety margin testing (DSMT) post-MRI. A total of 92 MRI's at 1.5 Tesla were performed in 38 patients. A total of 13 PMD patients, ten ICD patients, four cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) patients, and 11 non-PMD patients were scanned from four major manufacturers. No device circuitry damage, programming alterations, inappropriate shocks, failure to pace, or changes in sensing, pacing, or defibrillator thresholds were found on single or multiple MRI sessions. Our protocol for MRI in CIED patients appears safe, feasible, and reproducible. This is irrespective of the type of CIED, pacemaker dependancy or multiple 24-h scanning sessions. Our protocol addresses early detection of potential complications and establishes a response system for potential device-related complications. Our observation suggests that routine DFTT/DSMT post-MRI may not be necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 66
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A protocol for patients with cardiovascular implantable devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): should defibrillation threshold testing be performed post-(MRI)
    Peter Thomas Burke
    Hamid Ghanbari
    Patrick B. Alexander
    Michael K. Shaw
    Marcos Daccarett
    Christian Machado
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2010, 28 : 59 - 66
  • [3] An algorithm for pacing and cardioverting electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: The PACED-MRI protocol
    Goodwin, Elliott
    Fogelson, Benjamin
    Cox Jr, James W.
    Mahlow, William J.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2023, 96 : 44 - 49
  • [4] Should magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) be performed early after traumatic brain injury? Serial MRI during the first year post-injury.
    Skandsen, Toril
    Moen, Kent Goran
    Folvik, Mari
    Kvistad, Kjell Arne
    Rydland, Jana
    Vik, Anne
    BRAIN INJURY, 2012, 26 (4-5) : 523 - 523
  • [5] The safety of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with implantable cardiac devices compatible and non-compatible with MRI
    Rozmiarek, S.
    Rajewska-Tabor, J.
    Klotzka, A.
    Janus, M.
    Siniawski, A.
    Pyda, M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2019, 20 : 425 - 425
  • [6] Mortality After Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain in Patients With Cardiovascular Implantable Devices
    Padmanabhan, Deepak
    Jondal, Mary L.
    Hodge, David O.
    Mehta, Ramila A.
    Acker, Nancy G.
    Dalzell, Connie M.
    Kapa, Suraj
    Asirvatham, Samuel J.
    Cha, Yong-Mei
    Felmlee, Joel P.
    Watson, Robert E., Jr.
    Friedman, Paul A.
    CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 11 (01):
  • [7] Outcome of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in selected patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs)
    Gimbel, JR
    Kanal, E
    Schwartz, KM
    Wilkoff, BL
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 28 (04): : 270 - 273
  • [8] Cardiac troponin T in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging
    John V. Higgins
    Robert E. Watson
    Allan S. Jaffe
    Connie Dalzell
    Nancy Acker
    Joel P. Felmlee
    Samuel J. Asirvatham
    Yong-Mei Cha
    Paul A. Friedman
    Suraj Kapa
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2016, 45 : 91 - 97
  • [9] Automatic consultation system for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging
    Donghoon Han
    Ji Hyun Lee
    Il-Young Oh
    In-ho Chae
    Ho-Young Lee
    Youngjin Cho
    International Journal of Arrhythmia, 21 (1)
  • [10] Cardiac troponin T in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging
    Higgins, John V.
    Watson, Robert E., Jr.
    Jaffe, Allan S.
    Dalzell, Connie
    Acker, Nancy
    Felmlee, Joel P.
    Asirvatham, Samuel J.
    Cha, Yong-Mei
    Friedman, Paul A.
    Kapa, Suraj
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 45 (01) : 91 - 97