Towards an integrated approach for evaluating both the life cycle environmental and financial performance of a building: A review

被引:6
|
作者
Fouche, Monique [1 ]
Crawford, Robert H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
Life cycle analysis; life cycle cost; greenhouse gas; building; EMBODIED ENERGY; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.171
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A building is responsible for the emission of a significant amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions over the various stages of its life cycle. Industry and government have been primarily focused on assessing and implementing mitigation measures related to the operational GHG emissions of buildings, leaving the emissions related to other life cycle stages, such as raw material extraction and maintenance, largely ignored. However, the uptake of assessments, such as life cycle assessment (LCA), and mitigation measures that consider buildings' emissions from a life cycle perspective has been slow due to various barriers. One such barrier that has not been as widely documented yet is the uncertainty towards the financial cost of life cycle GHG emission reduction. There has been an increase in studies that have included both the environmental and financial assessment of a building or building systems over its expected lifetime. These studies often use the economic methodology called life cycle costing (LCC), that complements the life cycle approach of LCA, to help quantify the financial impact of a project. However most of these studies either base their results on exemplary low energy buildings, not traditional buildings that dominate the built fabric. In addition there is a trend to primarily focus on residential buildings, leaving other building typologies neglected. Other aspects to notice from these studies include the fact that most present findings of the life cycle energy impact, not life cycle GHG impact. There is also a need to use more comprehensive life cycle inventory data, such as hybrid, not just process data, to provide more comprehensive results. And lastly, most studies consider at new buildings, not refurbished or existing buildings. LCA and LCC support each other from a life cycle perspective however there is still a need to further develop an approach to concurrently balance both economic and environmental performance to create a more sustainable built environment. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 127
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrated Assessment Method for Building Life Cycle Environmental and Economic Performance
    Gu, Lijing
    Lin, Borong
    Zhu, Yingxin
    Gu, Daojin
    Huang, Mingxing
    Gai, Jiazi
    BUILDING SIMULATION, 2008, 1 (02) : 169 - 177
  • [2] Integrated assessment method for building life cycle environmental and economic performance
    Lijing Gu
    Borong Lin
    Yingxin Zhu
    Daojin Gu
    Mingxing Huang
    Jiazi Gai
    Building Simulation, 2008, 1 : 169 - 177
  • [3] Evaluating the environmental impacts of analytical chemistry methods: From a critical review towards a proposal using a life cycle approach
    Raccary, Bastien
    Loubet, Philippe
    Peres, Christophe
    Sonnemann, Guido
    TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2022, 147
  • [4] A METHOD FOR EVALUATING THE ENVIRONMENTAL LIFE CYCLE POTENTIAL OF BUILDING GEOMETRY
    Hollberg, A.
    Klueber, N.
    Schneider, S.
    Ruth, J.
    Donath, D.
    EXPANDING BOUNDARIES: SYSTEMS THINKING IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2016, : 590 - 595
  • [5] Evaluating the environmental performance of orange production in Veracruz, Mexico: A life cycle assessment approach
    Bonales-Revuelta, Joel
    Musule, Ricardo
    Navarro-Pineda, Freddy S.
    Garcia, Carlos A.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 343
  • [6] Environmental Performance of Building Integrated Grey Water Reuse Systems: Life Cycle Assessment Perspective
    Yoonus, Hamad
    Mannan, Mehzabeen
    Al-Ghamdi, Sami G.
    WORLD ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES CONGRESS 2020: WATER, WASTEWATER, AND STORMWATER AND WATER DESALINATION AND REUSE, 2020, : 1 - 7
  • [7] Evaluating the life cycle of a building: A multivariant and multiple criteria approach
    Banaitiene, Nerija
    Banaitis, Audrius
    Kaklauskas, Arturas
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2008, 36 (03): : 429 - 441
  • [8] ?n integrated life cycle assessment and life cycle costing approach towards sustainable building renovation via a dynamic online tool
    Apostolopoulos, Vasilis
    Mamounakis, Ioannis
    Seitaridis, Andreas
    Tagkoulis, Nikolas
    Kourkoumpas, Dimitrios-Sotirios
    Iliadis, Petros
    Angelakoglou, Komninos
    Nikolopoulos, Nikolaos
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 334
  • [9] Towards a comprehensive life cycle approach of building automation systems
    Lehmann, Matthias
    Andreas, Joerg
    Tuan Linh Mai
    Kabitzsch, Klaus
    2017 IEEE 26TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS (ISIE), 2017, : 1541 - 1547
  • [10] Integrated energy and environmental life cycle assessment of office building envelopes
    Azari, Rahman
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2014, 82 : 156 - 162