Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of QUEST 2.0 with users of various types of assistive devices

被引:76
|
作者
Wessels, RD [1 ]
De Witte, LP [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Rehabil Res, NL-6430 AD Hoensbroek, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1080/0963828021000031197
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose : In this paper, the Dutch version of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology(D-QUEST) is validated in users of a large variety of assistive devices (n = 2002). Method : D-QUEST consists of a written questionnaire. The respondent rates his or her satisfaction with respect to 12 aspects on a five-point scale. Users of 10 different types of assistive devices participated. Analyses were performed for each type of assistive device. Reliability is tested by analysing internal consistency. Content validity is tested by analysing applicability of the 12 aspects. The non-applicability option for answering questions is studied. Construct validity is tested by analysing correlations with problem solving and with general satisfaction. Results:Reliability proves to be good for all types of assistive devices. Including the non-applicability option improves the feasibility of the instrument without affecting content validity. Correlations between D-QUEST scores on the one hand and problem solving and general satisfaction questions on the other areas expected,supporting validity. Conclusions : D-QUEST (and therefore also QUEST) proves itself to be a highly applicable,reliable and valid instrument to assess user-satisfaction of users of all kinds of assistive device provisions.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 272
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Translation, adaptation, validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the 'blue flags' questionnaire
    Westerweel, Anne
    Heerkens, Yvonne F.
    Oswald, Wiebke
    Post Sennehed, Charlotte
    Stigmar, Kjerstin
    van Hees, Suzanne
    van Lankveld, Wim
    Hutting, Nathan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2022, 24 (06) : 339 - 348
  • [32] Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS)
    Inge van den Akker-Scheek
    Arnoud Seldentuis
    Inge HF Reininga
    Martin Stevens
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 14
  • [33] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the pressure injury knowledge assessment tool 2.0
    Ursavas, Figen Erol
    Bayrak, Damla
    JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY, 2021, 30 (04) : 582 - 587
  • [34] The stroke impact scale version 2.0 - Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change
    Duncan, PW
    Wallace, D
    Lai, SM
    Johnson, D
    Embretson, S
    Laster, LJ
    STROKE, 1999, 30 (10) : 2131 - 2140
  • [35] Reliability, Validity, and Scoring of the Health Status Questionnaire-12 Version 2.0
    Barry, Teresa L.
    Kaiser, Katherine Laux
    Atwood, Jan R.
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MEASUREMENT, 2007, 15 (01) : 24 - 35
  • [36] MEASURING EMPATHIC TENDENCIES: RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE DUTCH VERSION OF THE INTERPERSONAL REACTIVITY INDEX
    De Corte, Kim
    Buysse, Ann
    Verhofstadt, Lesley L.
    Roeyers, Herbert
    Ponnet, Koen
    Davis, Mark H.
    PSYCHOLOGICA BELGICA, 2007, 47 (04) : 235 - 260
  • [37] Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Consultation and Relational Empathy Measure in primary care
    van Dijk, Inge
    Lenferink, Nick Scholten Meilink
    Lucassen, Peter L. B. J.
    Mercer, Stewart W.
    van Weel, Chris
    Hartman, Tim C. Olde
    Speckens, Anne E. M.
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2017, 34 (01) : 119 - 124
  • [38] Reliability and structural validity of the Dutch version of Perceived Stigmatization Questionnaire in adults with burns
    Willemse, Heidi
    Geenen, Rinie
    Van Loey, Nancy E.
    BURNS, 2021, 47 (06) : 1381 - 1388
  • [39] A Dutch version of the Modified Reasons for Smoking Scale: factorial structure, reliability and validity
    Boudrez, Hedwig
    De Bacquer, Dirk
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2012, 18 (04) : 799 - 806
  • [40] Vancouver Symptom Score for Dysfunctional Elimination Syndrome: Reliability and Validity of the Dutch Version
    't Hoen, Lisette A.
    Korfage, Ida J.
    Verhallen, Jacintha T. C. M.
    van Ledden-Klok, Marjan J.
    van den Hoek, Joop
    Blok, Bertil F. M.
    Scheepe, Jeroen R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (02): : 536 - 541