Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of QUEST 2.0 with users of various types of assistive devices

被引:76
|
作者
Wessels, RD [1 ]
De Witte, LP [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Rehabil Res, NL-6430 AD Hoensbroek, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1080/0963828021000031197
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose : In this paper, the Dutch version of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology(D-QUEST) is validated in users of a large variety of assistive devices (n = 2002). Method : D-QUEST consists of a written questionnaire. The respondent rates his or her satisfaction with respect to 12 aspects on a five-point scale. Users of 10 different types of assistive devices participated. Analyses were performed for each type of assistive device. Reliability is tested by analysing internal consistency. Content validity is tested by analysing applicability of the 12 aspects. The non-applicability option for answering questions is studied. Construct validity is tested by analysing correlations with problem solving and with general satisfaction. Results:Reliability proves to be good for all types of assistive devices. Including the non-applicability option improves the feasibility of the instrument without affecting content validity. Correlations between D-QUEST scores on the one hand and problem solving and general satisfaction questions on the other areas expected,supporting validity. Conclusions : D-QUEST (and therefore also QUEST) proves itself to be a highly applicable,reliable and valid instrument to assess user-satisfaction of users of all kinds of assistive device provisions.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 272
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliability and validity of the Italian version of Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 (QUEST-IT 2.0) with users of mobility assistive device
    Colucci, Mariele
    Tofani, Marco
    Trioschi, Devis
    Guarino, Domenico
    Berardi, Anna
    Galeoto, Giovanni
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 16 (03) : 251 - 254
  • [2] Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis
    Demers, L
    Monette, M
    Lapierre, Y
    Arnold, DL
    Wolfson, C
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2002, 24 (1-3) : 21 - 30
  • [3] Psychometric evaluation of the Arabic version of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (A-QUEST 2.0) in prosthesis users
    Kablan, Nilufer
    Bakhsh, Hadeel R.
    Alammar, Walaa
    Tatar, Yasar
    Ferriero, Giorgio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2022, 58 (01) : 118 - 126
  • [4] The Rasch Analysis Shows Poor Construct Validity and Low Reliability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 (QUEST 2.0) Questionnaire
    Caronni, Antonio
    Ramella, Marina
    Arcuri, Pietro
    Salatino, Claudia
    Pigini, Lucia
    Saruggia, Maurizio
    Folini, Chiara
    Scarano, Stefano
    Converti, Rosa Maria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 20 (02)
  • [5] Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Readiness to Change Questionnaire
    Defuentes-Merillas, L
    Dejong, CAJ
    Schippers, GM
    ALCOHOL AND ALCOHOLISM, 2002, 37 (01): : 93 - 99
  • [6] Validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the displaced aggression questionnaire
    Smeijers, Danique
    Denson, Thomas F.
    Bulten, Erik H.
    Brazil, Inti A.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 11 (12): : 1288 - 1300
  • [7] Reliability and validity of the Portuguese version of the Stroke Impact Scale 2.0 (SIS 2.0)
    Goncalves, Rui Soles
    Gil, Joao Neves
    Cavalheiro, Luis Manuel
    Costa, Rui Dias
    Ferreira, Pedro Lopes
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2012, 21 (04) : 691 - 696
  • [8] Reliability and validity of the Portuguese version of the Stroke Impact Scale 2.0 (SIS 2.0)
    Rui Soles Gonçalves
    João Neves Gil
    Luís Manuel Cavalheiro
    Rui Dias Costa
    Pedro Lopes Ferreira
    Quality of Life Research, 2012, 21 : 691 - 696
  • [9] Validation of the Greek version of the device subscale of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 (QUEST 2.0)
    Koumpouros, Yiannis
    Karavasili, Alexandra
    Papageorgiou, Effie
    Siavelis, Panagiotis
    ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 28 (03) : 152 - 158
  • [10] Reliability and validity of the Portuguese version of the Stroke Impact Scale 2.0
    Goncalves, Rui S.
    Gil, Joao N.
    Cavalheiro, Luis
    Costa, Rui D.
    Ferreira, Pedro L.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 : 118 - 119