Angiographic and clinical outcomes of patients implanted with ultrathin, biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

被引:0
|
作者
Liao, Chen [1 ,2 ]
Liao, Sen [3 ]
Liu, Miaoweng [2 ]
Xu, Ruoxin [2 ]
Peng, Jinhua [1 ]
Wei, Yiping [1 ]
Zhang, Wenxiong [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Affiliated Hosp 2, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Jiangxi Med Coll, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Nanchang Univ, FuZhou Med Coll, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY | 2021年 / 62卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Meta-analysis; Polymers; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Coronary artery disease; 5-YEAR OUTCOMES; NON-INFERIORITY; DESSOLVE III; THIN-STRUT; MULTICENTER; SAFETY; IV; QUALITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.23736/S0021-9509.20.11620-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Whether sirolimus-eluting stents constituted with ultrathin-strut and biodegradable polymers (BP-SESs) can achieve a preferable effect over current drug-eluting stents with durable polymers (DP-DESs) remains highly controversial. The aim of this analysis based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to detect the clinical and angiographic differences between ultrathin (defined as a strut thickness <70 mu m) BP-SESs and DP-DESs. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We searched seven databases to identify eligible articles. Late lumen loss (LLL) and target lesion failure (TLF) were assessed as the primary endpoints for angiographic and clinical outcomes, respectively. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Nineteen articles containing thirteen RCTs with 14801 patients were analyzed. For the 9-month angiographic outcomes, similar results were discovered between BP-SESs and DP-DESs in terms of in-stent LLL (mean difference [MD]: -0.02 [-0.05, 0.01], P=0.23), in-segment LLL (MD: -0.01 [-0.04, 0.03], P=0.74), in-stent minimum lumen diameter (MLD) (MD: -0.01 [-0.06, 0.04], P=0.72), insegment MLD (MD: -0.01 [-0.06, 0.05], P=0.75), in-stent diameter stenosis (DS) (MD: -1.10 [-3.36, 1.15], P=0.34), in-segment DS (MD: -0.78 [-1.97, 0.40], P=0.20), in-stent binary restenosis (BR) (risk ratio [RR]: 2.27 [0.99, 5.21], P=0.05) and in-segment BR (RR: 1.46 [0.78, 2.75], P=0.24). Regarding the 12-month clinical outcomes, there was a significant decrease in TLF and a trend of a lower incidence of target vessel failure (RR: 0.89 [0.78,1.01], P=0.08), myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel MI. CONCLUSIONS: With similar angiographic results, BP-SESs appeared to be superior to DP-DESs with better clinical prognoses, especially for female patients, patients with STEMI and ACS and patients without diabetes. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 187
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Randomized clinical trial comparing abluminal biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents: Nine months angiographic and 5-year clinical outcomes
    Zhang, Haijun
    Wang, Xiangfei
    Deng, Wei
    Wang, Shenguo
    Ge, Junbo
    Toft, Egon
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (38)
  • [22] Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent vs. contemporary durable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Bavishi, Chirag
    Chugh, Yashasvi
    Kimura, Takeshi
    Natsuaki, Masahiro
    Kaiser, Christoph
    Gordon, Paul
    Aronow, Herbert D.
    Abbott, Jinnette Dawn
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-QUALITY OF CARE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES, 2020, 6 (01) : 81 - 88
  • [23] No differences in clinical efficacy and safety between biodegradable polymer and durable polymer drug-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Kwong, Joey S.
    Yu, Cheuk Man
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 62 (18) : B252 - B252
  • [24] ARE BIODEGRADABLE POLYMER DRUG-ELUTING STENTS THE FUTURE? A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Gaddam, Sainath
    Nalluri, Nikhil
    Parikh, Valay
    Bhat, Tariq
    Tamburrino, Frank
    Lafferty, James
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (12) : A54 - A54
  • [25] Polymer-free drug-eluting stents versus permanent polymer drug-eluting stents An updated meta-analysis
    Chen, Yun-lin
    Fan, Jinqi
    Chen, Guozhu
    Cao, Li
    Lu, Li
    Xu, Yanping
    Yin, Yuehui
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (15)
  • [26] Ultrathin-Strut Biodegradable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin-Strut Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data From Randomized Controlled Trials
    Pilgrim, Thomas
    Rothenbuhler, Martina
    Siontis, George C. M.
    Kandzari, David E.
    Asami, Masahiko
    Lefevre, Thierry
    Piccolo, Raffaele
    Hunziker, Lukas
    Koolen, Jacques
    Saito, Shigeru
    Slagboom, Ton
    Waksman, Ron
    Windecker, Stephan
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 12 (04) : S19 - S20
  • [27] Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents for primary percutaneous coronary revascularisation of acute myocardial infarction
    Pilgrim, Thomas
    Piccolo, Raffaele
    Heg, Dik
    Roffi, Marco
    Tuller, David
    Vuilliomenet, Andre
    Muller, Olivier
    Cook, Stephane
    Weilenmann, Daniel
    Kaiser, Christoph
    Jamshidi, Peiman
    Khattab, Ahmed A.
    Taniwaki, Masanori
    Rigamonti, Fabio
    Nietlispach, Fabian
    Blochlinger, Stefan
    Wenaweser, Peter
    Juni, Peter
    Windecker, Stephan
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2016, 12 (11) : E1343 - E1354
  • [28] Randomized comparison of biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary revascularization: Rationale and design of the BIOSCIENCE trial
    Pilgrim, Thomas
    Roffi, Marco
    Tueller, David
    Muller, Olivier
    Vuilliomenet, Andre
    Cook, Stephane
    Weilenmann, Daniel
    Kaiser, Christoph
    Jamshidi, Peiman
    Heg, Dik
    Jueni, Peter
    Windecker, Stephan
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 168 (03) : 256 - 261
  • [29] Everolimus-eluting versus sirolimus-eluting stents: an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Antoinette de Waha
    Salvatore Cassese
    Duk-Woo Park
    Francesco Burzotta
    Robert A. Byrne
    Tomohisa Tada
    Lamin A. King
    Seung-Jung Park
    Albert Schömig
    Adnan Kastrati
    Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2012, 101 : 461 - 467
  • [30] Comparison of efficacy and safety between ultrathin bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents and thin durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature
    Zhai, Zhen-yu
    Li, Ju-xiang
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2019, 30 (08) : 590 - 599