Angiographic and clinical outcomes of patients implanted with ultrathin, biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

被引:0
|
作者
Liao, Chen [1 ,2 ]
Liao, Sen [3 ]
Liu, Miaoweng [2 ]
Xu, Ruoxin [2 ]
Peng, Jinhua [1 ]
Wei, Yiping [1 ]
Zhang, Wenxiong [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Affiliated Hosp 2, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Jiangxi Med Coll, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Nanchang Univ, FuZhou Med Coll, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY | 2021年 / 62卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Meta-analysis; Polymers; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Coronary artery disease; 5-YEAR OUTCOMES; NON-INFERIORITY; DESSOLVE III; THIN-STRUT; MULTICENTER; SAFETY; IV; QUALITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.23736/S0021-9509.20.11620-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Whether sirolimus-eluting stents constituted with ultrathin-strut and biodegradable polymers (BP-SESs) can achieve a preferable effect over current drug-eluting stents with durable polymers (DP-DESs) remains highly controversial. The aim of this analysis based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to detect the clinical and angiographic differences between ultrathin (defined as a strut thickness <70 mu m) BP-SESs and DP-DESs. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We searched seven databases to identify eligible articles. Late lumen loss (LLL) and target lesion failure (TLF) were assessed as the primary endpoints for angiographic and clinical outcomes, respectively. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Nineteen articles containing thirteen RCTs with 14801 patients were analyzed. For the 9-month angiographic outcomes, similar results were discovered between BP-SESs and DP-DESs in terms of in-stent LLL (mean difference [MD]: -0.02 [-0.05, 0.01], P=0.23), in-segment LLL (MD: -0.01 [-0.04, 0.03], P=0.74), in-stent minimum lumen diameter (MLD) (MD: -0.01 [-0.06, 0.04], P=0.72), insegment MLD (MD: -0.01 [-0.06, 0.05], P=0.75), in-stent diameter stenosis (DS) (MD: -1.10 [-3.36, 1.15], P=0.34), in-segment DS (MD: -0.78 [-1.97, 0.40], P=0.20), in-stent binary restenosis (BR) (risk ratio [RR]: 2.27 [0.99, 5.21], P=0.05) and in-segment BR (RR: 1.46 [0.78, 2.75], P=0.24). Regarding the 12-month clinical outcomes, there was a significant decrease in TLF and a trend of a lower incidence of target vessel failure (RR: 0.89 [0.78,1.01], P=0.08), myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel MI. CONCLUSIONS: With similar angiographic results, BP-SESs appeared to be superior to DP-DESs with better clinical prognoses, especially for female patients, patients with STEMI and ACS and patients without diabetes. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 187
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety of biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: A meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Yang, Yunjing
    Lei, Jiayan
    Huang, Wei
    Lei, Han
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 222 : 486 - 493
  • [2] Clinical Outcomes of Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Kwong, Joey S. W.
    Yu, Cheuk-Man
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 37 (07) : 440 - 453
  • [3] Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Zhu, Ping
    Zhou, Xin
    Zhang, Chenliang
    Li, Huakang
    Zhang, Zhihui
    Song, Zhiyuan
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2018, 18
  • [4] Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Ping Zhu
    Xin Zhou
    Chenliang Zhang
    Huakang Li
    Zhihui Zhang
    Zhiyuan Song
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 18
  • [5] Stent Thrombosis with Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents versus Durable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: An Update Meta-Analysis
    Zhu, Lin
    Lv, Yi Ning
    Wang, Li Yu
    CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 130 (02) : 96 - 105
  • [6] Biodegradable polymer drug eluting stents versus durable polymer drug eluting stents for percutaneous coronary intervention
    Kheifets, M.
    Levi, A.
    Bental, T.
    Perl, L.
    Codner, P.
    Wittberg, G.
    Talmor-Barkan, Y.
    Landes, U.
    Samara, A.
    Greenberg, G.
    Erez, A.
    Vaknin-Assa, H.
    Kornowski, R.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2021, 42 : 2137 - 2137
  • [7] Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary intervention: a contemporary registry-based analysis
    Levi, Amos
    Kheifets, Mark
    Bental, Tamir
    Perl, Leor
    Codner, Pablo
    Witberg, Guy
    Talmor-Barkan, Yeela
    Landes, Uri
    Samara, Abed
    Greenberg, Gabriel
    Erez, Aharon
    Vaknin-Assa, Hanna
    Kornowski, Ran
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2022, 33 (02) : 105 - 113
  • [8] Biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stents Versus bare metal stents Versus durable-polymer drug-eluting stents in Patients With in Patients Undergoing Coronary Revascularization: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zhu Jianbing
    Ge, Junbo
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 68 (16) : C169 - C170
  • [9] COMPARISON OF LONG-TERM OUTCOMES WITH BIODEGRADABLE POLYMER DRUG ELUTING STENTS AND DURABLE POLYMER DRUG ELUTING STENTS: AN UPDATED META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Tripathi, Byomesh
    Kost, Michael
    Ashukem, Moses
    Marchbanks, Katheryne
    Biglari, David
    Sugumaran, Rajkumar
    Centorino, Ligita
    Gramze, Nickalaus
    Mehr, Ali
    Arabia, Francisco
    Su, Wilber
    Kalya, Anantharam
    Banday, Arshad
    Abbas, Firas
    Butman, Samuel
    Patel, Nachiket
    Weiss, Peter
    Hurst, Robert
    Freiman, Samuel Unzek
    Gulati, Martha
    Gopalan, Radha
    Verma, Divya Ratan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (11) : 1460 - 1460
  • [10] Five-Year Outcomes of Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Second-Generation Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Yake Lou
    Ying Yu
    Ziwei Xi
    Yanan Gao
    Wei Liu
    Xiaomin Nie
    Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, 2019, 33 : 557 - 566