Paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine combination chemotherapy within a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach in metastatic nonsmall cell lung carcinoma - A Phase II study

被引:0
|
作者
Rodriguez, J
Cortes, J
Calvo, E
Azinovic, I
Fernandez-Hildago, O
Martinez-Monge, R
Garzon, C
de Irala, J
Martinez-Aguillo, M
Cajal, TRY
Brugarolas, A
机构
[1] Univ Navarra Clin, Dept Oncol, Pamplona 31008, Spain
[2] Univ Navarra Clin, Dept Radiotherapy, Pamplona 31008, Spain
[3] Univ Navarra, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, E-31080 Pamplona, Spain
关键词
nonsmall cell lung carcinoma; paclitaxel; cisplatin; gemcitabine; phase II study;
D O I
10.1002/1097-0142(20001215)89:12<2622::AID-CNCR15>3.0.CO;2-X
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy combinations improve quality of life and survival in advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The emergence of new active drugs might translate into more effective regimens for the treatment of this disease. METHODS. The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility, response rate, and toxicity of a paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine combination to treat metastatic NSCLC. Thirty-five consecutive chemotherapy-naive patients with Stage IV NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were treated with a combination of paclitaxel (135 mg/m(2) given intravenously in 3 hours) on Day 1, cisplatin (120 mg/m(2) given intravenously in 6 hours) on Day I, and gemcitabine (800 mg/m(2) given intravenously in 30 minutes) on Days 1 and 8, every 4 weeks. Although responding patients were scheduled to receive consolidation radiotherapy and 24 patients received preplanned second-line chemotherapy after disease progression, the response and toxicity rates reported refer only to the chemotherapy regimen given. RESULTS, All the patients were examined for toxicity; 34 were examinable for response. An objective response was observed in 73.5% of the patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 55.6-87.1%), including 4 complete responses (11.7%). According to intention-to-treat, the overall response rate was 71.4% (95% CI, 53.7-85.4%). After 154 courses of therapy, the median dose intensity was 131 mg/m(2) for paclitaxel (97.3%), 117 mg/m(2) for cisplatin (97.3%), and 1378 mg/m(2) for gemcitabine (86.2%). World Health Organization Grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 39.9% and 11.4% of patients, respectively. There was one treatment-related death. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild. After a median follow-up of 22 months, the median progression free survival rate was 7 months, and the median survival time was 16 months. CONCLUSIONS. The combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine is well tolerated and shows high activity in metastatic NSCLC. This treatment merits further comparison with other cisplatin-based regimens. Cancer 2000;89:2622-9. (C) 2000 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:2622 / 2629
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A cisplatin-gemcitabine phase II trial in locally advanced and advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer
    Vazquez, F
    Baron, FJ
    Cueva, JF
    Candamio, S
    Calvo, M
    Irigoyen, A
    Huidobro, C
    Lopez, R
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1998, 9 : 102 - 102
  • [42] Cisplatin-gemcitabine-paclitaxel in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A dose-finding study
    Comella, P
    Frasci, G
    Panza, N
    Pacilio, C
    Nicolella, GP
    Natale, M
    Manzione, L
    Gravina, A
    Cioffi, R
    Maiorino, L
    Comella, G
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1998, 9 : 98 - 98
  • [43] A study of gemcitabine-cisplatin vs paclitaxel-carboplatin chemotherapy in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the lung
    Rajan, T.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 18 (04) : S74 - S74
  • [44] Methotrexate-paclitaxel-epirubicin-carboplatin as second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder pretreated with cisplatin-gemcitabine: A phase II study
    Halim, Amal
    Abotouk, Niveen
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 9 (01) : 60 - 65
  • [45] Gemcitabine and vinorelbine in the second-line treatment of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma patients: Phase II study
    Lee, S
    Lee, E
    Jeong, H
    Lee, S
    Kim, J
    Shin, C
    Shim, J
    Kang, K
    Yoo, S
    In, K
    LUNG CANCER, 2005, 49 : S255 - S255
  • [46] Phase I-II study of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine in advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelium
    Bellmunt, J
    Guillem, V
    Paz-Ares, L
    González-Larriba, JL
    Carles, J
    Batiste-Alentorn, E
    Sáenz, A
    López-Brea, M
    Font, A
    Nogué, M
    Bastús, R
    Climent, MA
    de la Cruz, JJ
    Albanell, J
    Banús, JM
    Gallardo, E
    Diaz-Rubio, E
    Cortés-Funes, H
    Baselga, J
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (18) : 3247 - 3255
  • [47] A phase II study of gemcitabine plus oral etoposide in the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma
    Mok, TSK
    Zee, B
    Chan, ATC
    Yeo, W
    Yang, WT
    Yim, A
    Leung, SF
    Nguyen, B
    Leung, TWT
    Johnson, P
    CANCER, 2000, 89 (03) : 543 - 550
  • [48] COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY WITH VINORELBINE, IFOSFAMIDE, AND CISPLATIN - A PHASE-II STUDY IN STAGE IIIB-IV NONSMALL CELL LUNG-CANCER
    BALDINI, E
    TIBALDI, C
    CHELLA, A
    ANGELETTI, CA
    ROMANINI, A
    ANDREI, A
    ALGERI, R
    SILVANO, G
    CONTE, PF
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 1994, 21 (03) : 12 - 15
  • [49] A phase I-II study of docetaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin (DIP) combination chemotherapy regimen in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer
    Kosmas, C
    Tsavaris, NB
    Makatsoris, T
    Onyenadum, A
    Vadiaka, M
    Stavroyianni, N
    Sepsas, E
    Dimitropoulos, D
    Rokana, S
    Kalofonos, HP
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 98 (01) : 141 - 147
  • [50] Economic Evaluation of Gemcitabine Alone and in Combination with Cisplatin in the Treatment of Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer
    M. Lees
    M. Aristides
    N. Maniadakis
    J. McKendrick
    N. Botwood
    D. Stephenson
    PharmacoEconomics, 2002, 20 : 325 - 337