Tumor proximity to serosal surface as an independent prognostic factor in FIGO stage 1 endometrial cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Harbin, Laura M. [1 ]
Berry, Laurel K. [2 ]
Wahlquist, Amy E. [1 ]
Richmond, Joshua [1 ]
Graybill, Whitney S. [1 ]
Kohler, Matthew F. [1 ]
Creasman, William T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ South Carolina, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 96 Jonathan Lucas St,Suite 634, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] Wake Forest Sch Med, Sect Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
关键词
Tumor proximity; Independent prognostic factor; Endometrial cancer; Uterine cancer; Stage; 1; Early stage; Serosal surface; CARCINOMA; CLASSIFICATION; CRITERIA; PATTERNS; SURGERY;
D O I
10.31083/j.ejgo.2021.03.2310
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: Determine if tumor distance from serosal surface is an independent prognostic factor for disease recurrence and survival in stage 1 endometrial cancer. Methods: 747 patients diagnosed with stage 1 endometrial cancer between 1984 and 2015 were identified from an institutional database. This retrospective cohort was evaluated to assess differences in tumor distance from the serosal surface, histologic subtype, histologic grade, use of adjuvant treatment, recurrence rates and overall survival. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine if variables of interest were related to recurrence and overall survival. Concordance correlation coefficients were used to compare our model to the 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging. Results: Tumor distance from serosal surface ranged from o mm-21 mm. 47 (8.7%) patients experienced recurrence. Patients with tumors located 5 mm or less from the serosal surface were 2.24 times more likely to experience recurrent disease (HR 2.24, 95% CI: 1.16 to 4.31, p = 0.02). Concordance rates for disease recurrence were 0.573 and 0.583 for our tumor distance model compared to the 2009 FIGO staging (95% CI: 0.568 to 0.579 and 95% CI: 0.577 to 0.589). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that patients with tumors located 5 mm or less from the serosal surface have a two-fold increased risk of recurrence. Concordance rates are very similar between our model and the 2009 FIGO staging suggesting comparable predictability; these rates suggest there is room for improvement in both methods to predict disease recurrence and survival.
引用
收藏
页码:574 / 579
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] FIGO stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma: Prognostic factors and outcomes
    Hoekstra, A. V.
    Kim, R. J.
    Small, W.
    Rademaker, A. W.
    Singh, D. K.
    Schink, J. C.
    Lurain, J. R.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 112 (02) : S74 - S74
  • [22] The prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology and adnexal/serosal metastasis in stage IIIA endometrial cancer
    Havrilesky, Laura J.
    Cragun, Janiel M.
    Calingaert, Brian
    Secord, Angeles Alvarez
    Valea, Fidel A.
    Clarke-Pearson, Daniel L.
    Berchuck, Andrew
    Soper, John T.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 104 (02) : 401 - 405
  • [23] L1CAM as a Negative Prognostic Factor in Endometrioid Endometrial Adenocarcinoma FIGO Stage IA-IB
    Klat, Jaroslav
    Mladenka, Ales
    Dvorackova, Jana
    Bajsova, Sylva
    Simetka, Ondrej
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 39 (01) : 421 - 424
  • [24] Lymphvascular space involvement:: an independent prognostic factor in endometrial cancer
    Briët, JM
    Hollema, H
    Reesink, N
    Aalders, JG
    Mourits, MJE
    ten Hoor, KA
    Pras, E
    Boezen, HM
    van der Zee, AGJ
    Nijman, HW
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2005, 96 (03) : 799 - 804
  • [25] A suggested modification to FIGO stage I endometrial cancer
    Aristizabal, Patrick
    Graesslin, Olivier
    Barranger, Emmanuel
    Clavel-Chapelon, Francoise
    Haddad, Bassam
    Luton, Dominique
    Darai, Emile
    Rouzier, Roman
    Koskas, Martin
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 133 (02) : 192 - 196
  • [26] Analysis of FIGO Stage IIIc endometrial cancer patients
    McMeekin, DS
    Lashbrook, D
    Gold, M
    Johnson, G
    Walker, JL
    Mannel, R
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 81 (02) : 273 - 278
  • [27] A new prognostic model for FIGO stage 1 epithelial ovarian cancer
    Obermair, Andreas
    Fuller, Arlan
    Lopez-Varela, Elisa
    van Gorp, Toon
    Vergote, Ignace
    Eaton, Lynne
    Fowler, Jeff
    Quinn, Michael
    Hammond, Ian
    Marsden, Donald
    Proietto, Anthony
    Carter, Jonathan
    Davy, Margaret
    Tripcony, Lee
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 104 (03) : 607 - 611
  • [28] Positive Adnexal or Uterine Serosal Involvement in Stage IIIC Endometrial Cancer Is an Adverse Factor for Recurrence
    Hetu, Valerie
    Petignat, Patrick
    Wu, Yucan
    Drouin, Pierre
    Sauthier, Philippe
    Provencher, Diane
    Gauthier, Philippe
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2009, 67 (03) : 173 - 177
  • [29] Presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes is an independent prognostic factor in type I and II endometrial cancer
    de Jong, R. A.
    Leffers, N.
    Boezen, H. M.
    ten Hoor, K. A.
    van der Zee, A. G. J.
    Hollema, H.
    Nijman, H. W.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 114 (01) : 105 - 110
  • [30] LRG1 is an independent prognostic factor for endometrial carcinoma
    Wen, Shan-Yun
    Zhang, Li-Na
    Yang, Xiao-Mei
    Zhang, Yan-Li
    Ma, Li
    Ge, Qiu-Lin
    Jiang, Shu-Heng
    Zhu, Xiao-Lu
    Xu, Wei
    Ding, Wen-Jing
    Yang, Bing-Qing
    Zhang, Zhi-Gang
    Teng, Yin-Cheng
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2014, 35 (07) : 7125 - 7133