The South African English Smartphone Digits-in-Noise Hearing Test: Effect of Age, Hearing Loss, and Speaking Competence

被引:53
|
作者
Potgieter, Jenni-Mari [1 ]
Swanepoel, De Wet [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Myburgh, Hermanus Carel [4 ]
Smits, Cas [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pretoria, Dept Speech Language Pathol & Audiol, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
[2] Univ Western Australia, Sch Surg, Ear Sci Ctr, Nedlands, WA, Australia
[3] Ear Sci Inst Australia, Subiaco, WA, Australia
[4] Univ Pretoria, Dept Elect Elect & Comp Engn, Pretoria, South Africa
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Sect Ear & Hearing, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
EAR AND HEARING | 2018年 / 39卷 / 04期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Digits-in-noise; Hearing loss; Hearing screening; Hearing test; Smartphone; Speech-in-noise; SPEECH RECOGNITION ABILITIES; SCREENING-TESTS; OLDER-ADULTS; TRIPLET TEST; VALIDATION; HEALTH; INTELLIGIBILITY; DISABILITY; COSTS;
D O I
10.1097/AUD.0000000000000522
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study determined the effect of hearing loss and English-speaking competency on the South African English digits-in-noise hearing test to evaluate its suitability for use across native (N) and non-native (NN) speakers. Design: A prospective cross-sectional cohort study of N and NN English adults with and without sensorineural hearing loss compared puretone air conduction thresholds to the speech reception threshold (SRT) recorded with the smartphone digits-in-noise hearing test. A rating scale was used for NN English listeners' self-reported competence in speaking English. This study consisted of 454 adult listeners (164 male, 290 female; range 16 to 90 years), of whom 337 listeners had a best ear four-frequency pure-tone average (4FPTA; 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) of <= 25 dB HL. Results: A linear regression model identified three predictors of the digits-in-noise SRT, namely, 4FPTA, age, and self-reported English-speaking competence. The NN group with poor self-reported English-speaking competence (<= 5/10) performed significantly (p < 0.01) poorer than the N and NN (<= 6/10) groups on the digits-in-noise test. Screening characteristics of the test improved with separate cutoff values depending on English-speaking competence for the N and NN groups (<= 6/10) and NN group alone (<= 5/10). Logistic regression models, which include age in the analysis, showed a further improvement in sensitivity and specificity for both groups (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.962 and 0.903, respectively). Conclusions: Self-reported English-speaking competence had a significant influence on the SRT obtained with the smartphone digits-innoise test. A logistic regression approach considering SRT, self-reported English-speaking competence, and age as predictors of best ear 4FPTA >25 dB HL showed that the test can be used as an accurate hearing screening tool for N and NN English speakers. The smartphone digitsin-noise test, therefore, allows testing in a multilingual population familiar with English digits using dynamic cutoff values that can be chosen according to self-reported English-speaking competence and age.
引用
收藏
页码:656 / 663
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条