Effects of Central Corneal Stromal Thickness and Epithelial Thickness on Intraocular Pressure Using Goldmann Applanation and Non-Contact Tonometers

被引:23
|
作者
Lee, Marvin [1 ]
Ahn, Jaehong [2 ]
机构
[1] DMC Bundang Jesaeng Gen Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Songnam, South Korea
[2] Ajou Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Suwon 441749, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; GLAUCOMA; AGE; REDUCTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0151868
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Purpose To investigate whether corneal thickness parameters measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), such as central corneal thickness (CCT), central corneal stromal thickness (CCST), and central corneal epithelial thickness (CCET), influence the intraocular pressure (IOP) difference measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and non-contact tonometry (NCT). Methods In total, 50 eyes from 50 subjects without glaucomatous defects were included in this retrospective, cross-sectional study. We measured IOP using GAT and NCT and calculated the difference between the two methods. CCT was measured by a Cirrus HD-OCT device using anterior segment imaging. The basement membrane of the epithelium, which was seen as a high-reflection line in the OCT image, was taken as a reference line to measure CCST and CCET. Results The mean IOP measured by GAT and NCT was 16.7 +/- 3.0 and 18.1 +/- 3.8 mmHg, respectively. The mean IOP difference was 1.5 +/- 1.7 mmHg, and the IOP measured by NCT was 8.4% +/- 11.3% higher than that measured by GAT. The CCET and CCST were 57.9 +/- 5.6 and 501.7 +/- 33.8 mu m, respectively. CCT showed a positive correlation with both GAT IOP (r = 0.648, P < 0.001) and NCT IOP (r = 0.676, P < 0.001). Although CCST showed a significant correlation with GAT IOP and NCT IOP, CCET did not. The difference between GAT IOP and NCT IOP increased with CCT (r = 0.333, P = 0.018), and CCET was positively correlated with the IOP difference between GAT and NCT (r = 0.435, P = 0.002). Conclusions IOP increased with greater CCT, and CCST seemed to have a more important role than CCET. CCET also increased with greater CCT, and this may be a possible explanation for the increasing difference in IOP between GAT and NCT with increasing CCT.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The influence of corneal density and thickness on tonometry measurement with goldmann applanation, non-contact and iCare tonometry methods
    Lubbad, Ahmed
    Oluwatoba-Popoola, Irene
    Haar, Melanie
    Framme, Carsten
    Bajor, Anna
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 42 (07) : 2167 - 2174
  • [22] Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonomet
    Francis, Brian A.
    Hsieh, Amy
    Lai, Mei-Ying
    Chopra, Vikas
    Pena, Fernando
    Azen, Stanley
    Varma, Rohit
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 114 (01) : 20 - 26
  • [23] Pediatric intraocular pressure measurements: Tonometers, central corneal thickness, and anesthesia
    Fayed, Mahmoud A.
    Chen, Teresa C.
    SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 64 (06) : 810 - 825
  • [24] The effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure values using various tonometers in the dog
    Guresh, Andrew M.
    Horvath, Stephen J.
    Gemensky-Metzler, Anne
    Miller, Eric
    Yildiz, Vedat
    Myers, John V.
    Newbold, Georgina M.
    VETERINARY OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 24 : 154 - 161
  • [25] The Influence of Central Corneal Thickness on Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Among Selected Ethiopian Communities
    Gelaw, Yeshigeta
    Kollmann, Martin
    Irungu, Njuguna M.
    Ilako, Dunera R.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2010, 19 (08) : 514 - 518
  • [26] The relationship between intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness: A comparison between the Tono-Pen and Goldmann applanation
    Zhao, F
    Thomas, S
    Enzenauer, R
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2000, 41 (04) : S515 - S515
  • [27] Correction factors for central corneal thickness in Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Kutschan, A.
    Schroeder, B.
    Hager, A.
    Dave, H.
    Wegscheider, K.
    Wiegand, W.
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2010, 107 (01): : 30 - 35
  • [28] The Difference in Intraocular Pressure Readings Between 3 Applanation Tonometers is Independent of Central Corneal Thickness, in Glaucomatous and Nonglaucomatous Eyes
    Baily, Caroline
    Dooley, Ian
    Collins, Niamh
    Hickey-Dwyer, Marie
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2014, 23 (09) : 620 - 623
  • [29] Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers
    Ko, YC
    Liu, CJI
    Hsu, WM
    EYE, 2005, 19 (03) : 327 - 332
  • [30] Assessment of intraocular pressure measurement between Goldman applanation tonometer, rebound tonometer, non-contact tonometer, and its correlation with central corneal thickness
    Porwal, Amit C.
    Shrishrimal, Meghna
    Punamia, Ravin P.
    Mathew, Bennet Chacko
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 71 (05) : 1927 - 1931