Poor Inter-observer Agreement on the TASC II Classification of Femoropopliteal Lesions

被引:24
|
作者
Kukkonen, T. [1 ]
Korhonen, M. [2 ]
Halmesmaki, K. [1 ]
Lehti, L. [2 ]
Tiitola, M. [2 ]
Aho, P. [1 ]
Lepantalo, M. [1 ]
Venermo, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, FI-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Radiol, FI-00029 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
TASC; Classification; Femoropopliteal; Arterial lesions; Inter-observer agreement; BYPASS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.11.008
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the reproducibility of femoropopliteal TASC II classification and to analyse the influence of an educational intervention on inter-observer agreement. Design: This is a validation study. Materials: This study included 200 consecutive angiograms of femoropopliteal arterial lesions. Methods: Seven investigators evaluated the first 100 angiograms, independently aided by the available TASC guide. Thereafter, the intervention included a discussion of the 25 most problematic cases, initially by a panel of 22 vascular surgeons, and later by the seven investigators to clarify grading principles. In the second stage, the 100 remaining cases were evaluated independently. A multi-rater variation of Brennan and Prediger's free-marginal kappa (kappa(free)) was used to calculate inter-observer agreement. Results: There were lesions not fitting any of the TASC classes. Total agreement among all seven investigators was reached in 7% and 19% of the cases before and after the intervention, respectively. In the first stage, kappa(free) was 0.32 between all observers (range between two observers kappa(free) = 0.11-0.54). The intervention increased the agreement to kappa(free) = 0.49 (range: 0.20-0.56). Agreement between the two observers was 38-69% (mean 49%) before the intervention and 51-73% (mean 61%) thereafter. Conclusions: TASC II classification for femoropopliteal lesions allows individual interpretations, and the common use of this classification as a basis for decision making and reporting outcomes could therefore be questioned. (C) 2009 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 224
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The image in colposcopy: Inter-observer diagnostic agreement
    Montanari, GR
    Boselli, F
    9TH WORLD CONGRESS OF CERVICAL PATHOLOGY & COLPOSCOPY, 1996, : 471 - 474
  • [22] An Assessment of Inter-Observer Agreement in Water Source Classification and Sanitary Risk Observations
    Okotto-Okotto, Joseph
    Wanza, Peggy
    Kwoba, Emmah
    Yu, Weiyu
    Dzodzomenyo, Mawuli
    Thumbi, S. M.
    da Silva, Diogo Gomes
    Wright, Jim A.
    EXPOSURE AND HEALTH, 2020, 12 (04) : 809 - 822
  • [23] Poor inter-observer agreement on the endoscopic diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis among Japanese endoscopists
    Izumi, Daisuke
    Ishimura, Norihisa
    Okada, Mayumi
    Mikami, Hironobu
    Okimoto, Eiko
    Aimi, Masahito
    Mishiro, Tsuyoshi
    Oshima, Naoki
    Sato, Shuichi
    Ishihara, Shunji
    Kinoshita, Yoshikazu
    ESOPHAGUS, 2017, 14 (04) : 309 - 316
  • [24] Poor inter-observer agreement on the endoscopic diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis among Japanese endoscopists
    Daisuke Izumi
    Norihisa Ishimura
    Mayumi Okada
    Hironobu Mikami
    Eiko Okimoto
    Masahito Aimi
    Tsuyoshi Mishiro
    Naoki Oshima
    Shuichi Sato
    Shunji Ishihara
    Yoshikazu Kinoshita
    Esophagus, 2017, 14 : 309 - 316
  • [25] Poor inter-observer agreement in the measurement of respiratory rate in children: a prospective observational study
    Daw, William James
    Kingshott, Ruth N.
    Elphick, Heather E.
    BMJ PAEDIATRICS OPEN, 2017, 1 (01)
  • [26] Inter-Observer Agreement of the Paris Classification in Pt1B Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
    Gotink, Annieke W.
    Ten Kate, Fiebo
    Doukas, Michael
    Wijnhoven, Bas P.
    Bruno, Marco J.
    Looijenga, Leendert H.
    Koch, Arjun D.
    Biermann, Katharina
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (05) : AB565 - AB565
  • [27] A Prospective Assessment of Inter-Observer Agreement Among Endosonographers in the Classification and Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cysts
    Patel, Harsh
    Wallace, Michael
    Faigel, Douglas
    Brugge, William
    Patel, Suchi
    Lakhtakia, Sundeep
    Li, Zhao-Shen
    Sethi, Amrita
    Pleskow, Douglas K.
    Nguyen, Cuong C.
    Pannala, Rahul
    DeWitt, John M.
    Raimondo, Massimo
    Woodward, Timothy
    Ramchandani, Mohan
    Jin, Zhendong
    Xu, Can
    Al-Haddad, Mohammad
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 113 : S443 - S443
  • [28] Inter-observer agreement of the Paris classification in pT1b esophageal adenocarcinoma
    Gotink, A.
    Ten Kate, F.
    Doukas, M.
    Wijnhoven, B.
    Bruno, M.
    Looijenga, L.
    Koch, A.
    Biermann, K.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2017, 471 : S186 - S186
  • [29] Inter-observer agreement on levels of evidence in radiology articles
    Garcia-Villar, C.
    Plasencia-Martinez, J. M.
    Gutierrez-Amares, M. T.
    Garcia-Santos, J. M.
    RADIOLOGIA, 2023, 65 (06): : 573 - 576
  • [30] INTER-OBSERVER AGREEMENT IN JUDGING AUDITORY RESPONSES OF NEONATES
    CAMPANELLI, PA
    SCHEIN, JD
    EYE EAR NOSE AND THROAT MONTHLY, 1969, 48 (12): : 697 - +